Ford Super Chief Concept Burns All by Marty
New concept truck works on gas, hydrogen and ethanol.
More to Come from Ford by TCC Team
Automaker will be making lots more news in the coming months.
Carmakers interest in building
vehicles that run on alcohol got an important boost last week when a new study
published in the magazine Science
indicated that making motor fuel from corn actually can save energy.
For years, supporters of the
ethanol-based fuel have been ensnared in a running debate over whether turning
corn into alcohol really saves fuel. The essential argument against the wider
use of ethanol as a motor fuel was that the process of corn into alcohol
ultimately consumed more energy than it saved.
Academics, farmers, the farm
lobby, energy companies, environmentalists, and carmakers were all ultimately
dragged into the debate, which has grown in consequence as the price of oil has
jumped to recent highs.
The findings of Alexander Farrell
of the University of California-Berkeley basically dismantles the arguments of
ethanol critics, who had claimed that making ethanol was “negative” net energy —
producing it took more energy than it created.
Farrell’s basic results are
already being hailed by an ecumenical alliance that ranges from the Kansas Corn
Commission to the Web site Salon.com.
“One of the possible outcomes of
this research is a much better economy for farmers. We think if we really pay
attention to what we care about — lowering imported petroleum, reducing
greenhouse gases — we establish markets for green fuels and end up with a system
where the current method of supporting ethanol production through incentives and
subsidies can be eliminated,” Farrell said in an interview published by
Salon.com, the Web site that carries liberal commentary.
Farrell’s study also found that
ethanol made from plants such as willow trees led to even larger reductions in
the amount of greenhouses gas discharged into the atmosphere.
More interest in Detroit
Meanwhile, the debate over ethanol
has become increasingly critical for Detroit’s automakers, which are growing
more and more interested in ethanol’s capacity to cut dependence on imported oil
and to clean up the environment. Their escalating interest is in direct
proportion to the rise in sales of the Toyota Prius and other hybrid vehicles
that are expensive means to stretch America’s gasoline supplies.
The demands for both a more secure
source of motor fuel and for curbs on greenhouse gases have put more and more
pressure on automakers, particularly on financially strapped General Motors and
Ford Motor Co., which are heavily dependent on truck and SUV sales.
Both GM and Ford have built
vehicles that run on alcohol-based fuel; both now have rather sizeable fleets of
flex-fuel vehicles available. For years, though, the flex-fuel vehicles were
little more than a gimmick that GM and Ford used to circumvent the corporate
average fuel economy regulations.
Nevertheless, both GM and Ford
executives insist they have now become major proponents of ethanol-fueled
At the Washington Auto Show last
week, Ford unveiled the Ford Escape Hybrid E85, which married hybrid electric
power and flexible-fuel capability.
The Escape Hybrid E85 is the first
vehicle ready to operate on blends of fuel containing as much as 85 percent
ethanol, which releases no fossil-based carbon dioxide into the atmosphere from
its alcohol fuel (some is released in the 15 percent of the blend that consists
of gasoline). “As a leader in both hybrid vehicles and in vehicles capable of
operating on ethanol-based fuels, Ford is the ideal company to bring both
technologies together for the first time,” says Anne Stevens, Ford Motor Company
executive vice president.
“This innovative research program
could lead to breakthroughs to significantly reduce our nation’s dependence on
imported oil while also helping to address global climate change,” she added.
General Motors also has been
promoting its alcohol-fueled vehicles and even the Chrysler Group is getting in
on the act.
Still, not everyone is convinced ethanol is a panacea. GM and Ford rushed to alcohol-based fuel in the early 1980s in Brazil, where a boom in alcohol-based fuel went bust when oil prices plunged during the late 1980s. Brazil had built up huge surpluses of agricultural products that were eventually dumped on the world market, forcing down prices everywhere. In addition, large parts of the Amazon rain forest were plowed under for commercial crops.
“Promoting biofuels could very easily have negative outcomes,” Farrell acknowledged in his interview with Salon.com.