2019 Mazda CX-3 vs 2019 Nissan Rogue Sport

2019 Mazda CX-3

2019 Nissan Rogue Sport

Select style

Grand Touring AWD

Style	MPG City	MPG Hwy	Invoice	MSRP
CX-3 Grand Touring AWD	27	32	$26,364	$27,145
CX-3 Grand Touring FWD	29	34	$25,005	$25,745
CX-3 Sport AWD	27	32	$21,168	$21,790
CX-3 Sport FWD	29	34	$19,809	$20,390
CX-3 Touring AWD	27	32	$23,191	$23,875
CX-3 Touring FWD	29	34	$21,833	$22,475

Select style

AWD S

Style	MPG City	MPG Hwy	Invoice	MSRP
Rogue Sport AWD S	24	30	$22,429	$23,690
Rogue Sport AWD SL	24	30	$27,834	$29,410
Rogue Sport AWD SV	24	30	$24,130	$25,490
Rogue Sport FWD S	25	32	$21,154	$22,340
Rogue Sport FWD SL	25	32	$26,557	$28,060
Rogue Sport FWD SV	25	32	$22,855	$24,140

Show Only Differences

Pricing

Invoice Price

$26,364

$22,429

Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price

$27,145

$23,690

Monthly Payment Estimate

$452 / month

$395 / month

The Car Connection's Take

TCC Rating

5.8

Read Our Full Review

5.2

Read Our Full Review

TCC’s Bottom Line

The 2019 Mazda CX-3 fails to launch in the crossover-SUV space race.

The 2019 Nissan Rogue Sport is a smaller crossover built for smaller families—and small budgets.

TCC Likes

Great, simple exterior shape
Good standard touchscreen
Standard advanced safety features

Conservative style
Standard advanced safety features
Good base infotainment system

TCC Dislikes

Cramped rear seat
Not much cargo room with seats up
Finicky infotainment system

Leisurely acceleration
No advanced powertrains
Cramped rear seat

Fuel Economy

City

27 mpg

24 mpg

Highway

32 mpg

30 mpg

Vehicle

EPA Classification

Compact Cars

Small Station Wagons

Interior Dimensions

Passenger Volume (ft³)

86.3

Second Hip Room (in)

46.9

Front Shoulder Room (in)

53.5

56.6

Second Head Room (in)

37.2

38.3

Passenger Capacity

Second Shoulder Room (in)

50.4

55.7

Front Leg Room (in)

41.7

42.8

Front Hip Room (in)

52.3

53.4

Second Leg Room (in)

33.4

Front Head Room (in)

37.6

39.6

Exterior Dimensions

Track Width, Front (in)

62.4

Min Ground Clearance (in)

6.2

7.4

Length, Overall (in)

168.3

172.4

Height, Overall (in)

60.9

63.3

Track Width, Rear (in)

59.9

62.2

Wheelbase (in)

101.2

104.2

Width, Max w/o mirrors (in)

69.6

72.3

Cargo Area Dimensions

Cargo Box Width @ Wheelhousings (in)

39.4

Cargo Volume to Seat 2 (ft³)

9.6

22.9

Cargo Area Length @ Floor to Seat 2 (in)

30.9

33.3

Cargo Volume to Seat 1 (ft³)

41.7

61.1

Cargo Volume to Seat 3 (ft³)

9.6

22.9

Cargo Area Length @ Floor to Seat 1 (in)

56.7

62.3

Cargo Area Width @ Beltline (in)

54.2

Cargo Box (Area) Height (in)

33.3

Brakes

Front Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness (in)

11.6

11.7

Drum - Rear (Yes or )

Brake ABS System

4-Wheel

Disc - Rear (Yes or )

Yes

Rear Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness (in)

11.1

11.5

Brake Type

4-Wheel Disc

Rear Drum Diam x Width (in)

Disc - Front (Yes or )

Yes

Fuel Tank

Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx (gal)

11.9

14.5

Steering

Turning Diameter - Curb to Curb (ft)

34.8

36.9

Steering Type

Rack-Pinion

Tires

Front Tire Size

P215/50VR18

P215/65HR16

Spare Tire Size

Compact

Front Tire Order Code

Spare Tire Order Code

Rear Tire Size

P215/50VR18

P215/65HR16

Rear Tire Order Code

Weight Information

Base Curb Weight (lbs)

2952

3377

Wheels

Spare Wheel Size (in)

Compact

Rear Wheel Material

Aluminum

Steel

Rear Wheel Size (in)

18 X 7

16 X 6.5

Front Wheel Material

Aluminum

Steel

Spare Wheel Material

Steel

Front Wheel Size (in)

18 X 7

16 X 6.5

Electrical

Maximum Alternator Capacity (amps)

100

110

Engine

SAE Net Torque @ RPM

146 @ 2800

147 @ 4400

Engine Order Code

Displacement

2.0 L/122

SAE Net Horsepower @ RPM

148 @ 6000

141 @ 6000

Engine Type

Regular Unleaded I-4

Fuel System

Gasoline Direct Injection

Mileage

Fuel Economy Est-Combined (MPG)

EPA Fuel Economy Est - Hwy (MPG)

EPA Fuel Economy Est - City (MPG)

Transmission

First Gear Ratio (:1)

3.55

2.63 - 0.38

Final Drive Axle Ratio (:1)

4.33

6.39

Third Gear Ratio (:1)

1.45

Trans Type

Drivetrain

All Wheel Drive

Fifth Gear Ratio (:1)

0.71

Trans Description Cont. Again

Reverse Ratio (:1)

3.89

5.60

Second Gear Ratio (:1)

2.02

Trans Order Code

Fourth Gear Ratio (:1)

1.00

Trans Description Cont.

Automatic w/OD

CVT w/OD

Sixth Gear Ratio (:1)

0.60

Summary

Vehicle Name

Mazda CX-3

Nissan Rogue Sport

Body Style

i-ACTIV AWD Sport Utility

Sport Utility

Suspension

Suspension Type - Front (Cont.)

Strut

Suspension Type - Rear

Torsion Beam

Multi-Link

Suspension Type - Rear (Cont.)

Torsion Beam

Multi-Link

Suspension Type - Front

Strut

Emissions

Tons/yr of CO2 Emissions @ 15K mi/year

6.1

6.6

Crash Test Ratings

Overall Rating

Overall Frontal Barrier Crash Rating

Frontal Barrier Crash Rating Driver

Frontal Barrier Crash Rating Passenger

Overall Side Crash Rating

Side Barrier Rating

Side Barrier Rating Driver

Side Barrier Rating Passenger Rear Seat

Side Pole Rating Driver Front Seat

Combined Side Rating Front Seat

Combined Side Rating Rear Seat

Rollover Rating

Get FREE Dealer Quotes

From dealers near you

Go!

Compare 2019 Mazda CX-3 vs 2019 Nissan Rogue Sport

Get FREE Dealer Quotes

Add a Vehicle to Compare