Compare 2019 Mazda CX-3 vs 2019 Nissan Rogue Sport

2019 Mazda CX-3
2019 Nissan Rogue Sport
Add Vehicle
Select style
Grand Touring AWD
Style MPG City MPG Hwy Invoice MSRP
CX-3 Grand Touring AWD 27 32 $26,364 $27,145
CX-3 Grand Touring FWD 29 34 $25,005 $25,745
CX-3 Sport AWD 27 32 $21,168 $21,790
CX-3 Sport FWD 29 34 $19,809 $20,390
CX-3 Touring AWD 27 32 $23,191 $23,875
CX-3 Touring FWD 29 34 $21,833 $22,475
Select style
AWD S
Style MPG City MPG Hwy Invoice MSRP
Rogue Sport AWD S 24 30 $22,429 $23,690
Rogue Sport AWD SL 24 30 $27,834 $29,410
Rogue Sport AWD SV 24 30 $24,130 $25,490
Rogue Sport FWD S 25 32 $21,154 $22,340
Rogue Sport FWD SL 25 32 $26,557 $28,060
Rogue Sport FWD SV 25 32 $22,855 $24,140
Pricing
Invoice Price
$26,364
$22,429
Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price
$27,145
$23,690
Monthly Payment Estimate
$452 / month
$395 / month
The Car Connection's Take
TCC Rating
5.8
5.2
TCC’s Bottom Line
The 2019 Mazda CX-3 fails to launch in the crossover-SUV space race. The 2019 Nissan Rogue Sport is a smaller crossover built for smaller families—and small budgets.
TCC Likes
TCC Dislikes
Fuel Economy
City
27 mpg 24 mpg
Highway
32 mpg 30 mpg
Vehicle
EPA Classification
Compact Cars Small Station Wagon
Interior Dimensions
Second Leg Room (in)
35 33.4
Front Head Room (in)
37.6 39.6
Passenger Volume (ft³)
86.3 96
Second Hip Room (in)
49 46.9
Front Shoulder Room (in)
53.5 56.6
Second Head Room (in)
37.2 38.3
Passenger Capacity
5 5
Second Shoulder Room (in)
50.4 55.7
Front Leg Room (in)
41.7 42.8
Front Hip Room (in)
52.3 53.4
Exterior Dimensions
Width, Max w/o mirrors (in)
69.6 72.3
Track Width, Front (in)
60 62.4
Min Ground Clearance (in)
6.2 7.4
Length, Overall (in)
168.3 172.4
Height, Overall (in)
60.9 63.3
Track Width, Rear (in)
59.9 62.2
Wheelbase (in)
101.2 104.2
Cargo Area Dimensions
Cargo Volume to Seat 3 (ft³)
9.6 22.9
Cargo Area Length @ Floor to Seat 1 (in)
56.7 62.3
Cargo Box Width @ Wheelhousings (in)
39.4 -
Cargo Volume to Seat 2 (ft³)
9.6 22.9
Cargo Area Length @ Floor to Seat 2 (in)
30.9 33.3
Cargo Volume to Seat 1 (ft³)
41.7 61.1
Cargo Box (Area) Height (in)
- 33.3
Cargo Area Width @ Beltline (in)
- 54.2
Brakes
Disc - Front (Yes or )
Yes Yes
Front Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness (in)
11.6 11.7
Drum - Rear (Yes or )
NA NA
Brake ABS System
4-Wheel 4-Wheel
Disc - Rear (Yes or )
Yes Yes
Rear Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness (in)
11.1 11.5
Brake Type
4-Wheel Disc 4-Wheel Disc
Rear Drum Diam x Width (in)
NA NA
Fuel Tank
Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx (gal)
11.9 14.5
Steering
Turning Diameter - Curb to Curb (ft)
34.8 36.9
Steering Type
Rack-Pinion Rack-Pinion
Tires
Rear Tire Order Code
NA NA
Front Tire Size
P215/50VR18 P215/65HR16
Spare Tire Size
Compact Compact
Front Tire Order Code
NA NA
Spare Tire Order Code
NA NA
Rear Tire Size
P215/50VR18 P215/65HR16
Weight Information
Base Curb Weight (lbs)
2952 3377
Wheels
Spare Wheel Material
Steel Steel
Front Wheel Size (in)
18 X 7 16 X 6.5
Spare Wheel Size (in)
Compact Compact
Rear Wheel Material
Aluminum Steel
Rear Wheel Size (in)
18 X 7 16 X 6.5
Front Wheel Material
Aluminum Steel
Electrical
Maximum Alternator Capacity (amps)
100 110
Engine
Fuel System
Gasoline Direct Injection Gasoline Direct Injection
SAE Net Torque @ RPM
146 @ 2800 147 @ 4400
Engine Order Code
NA NA
Displacement
2.0 L/122 2.0 L/122
SAE Net Horsepower @ RPM
148 @ 6000 141 @ 6000
Engine Type
Regular Unleaded I-4 Regular Unleaded I-4
Mileage
EPA Fuel Economy Est - City (MPG)
27 24
Fuel Economy Est-Combined (MPG)
29 27
EPA Fuel Economy Est - Hwy (MPG)
32 30
Transmission
Trans Description Cont.
Automatic w/OD CVT w/OD
Sixth Gear Ratio (:1)
0.60 -
First Gear Ratio (:1)
3.55 2.63 - 0.38
Final Drive Axle Ratio (:1)
4.33 6.39
Third Gear Ratio (:1)
1.45 -
Trans Type
6 1
Drivetrain
All Wheel All Wheel
Fifth Gear Ratio (:1)
0.71 -
Trans Description Cont. Again
NA NA
Reverse Ratio (:1)
3.89 5.60
Second Gear Ratio (:1)
2.02 -
Trans Order Code
NA NA
Fourth Gear Ratio (:1)
1.00 -
Summary
Vehicle Name
Mazda CX-3 Nissan Rogue Sport
Body Style
i-ACTIV AWD Sport Utility Sport Utility
Suspension
Suspension Type - Front
Strut Strut
Suspension Type - Front (Cont.)
Strut Strut
Suspension Type - Rear
Torsion Beam Multi-Link
Suspension Type - Rear (Cont.)
Torsion Beam Multi-Link
Emissions
Tons/yr of CO2 Emissions @ 15K mi/year
6.1 6.6
Crash Test Ratings
Overall Rating
Overall Frontal Barrier Crash Rating
Frontal Barrier Crash Rating Driver
Frontal Barrier Crash Rating Passenger
Overall Side Crash Rating
Side Barrier Rating
Side Barrier Rating Driver
Side Barrier Rating Passenger Rear Seat
Side Pole Rating Driver Front Seat
Combined Side Rating Front Seat
Combined Side Rating Rear Seat
Rollover Rating

Get FREE Dealer Quotes

From dealers near you
Go!

Add a Vehicle to Compare

Select a vehicle below
Please choose a make.
Please choose a model.
Please choose a year.
Continue