2017 Mazda CX-3 vs 2017 Nissan Juke

2017 Mazda CX-3

2017 Nissan Juke

Select style

Grand Touring AWD

Style	MPG City	MPG Hwy	Invoice	MSRP
CX-3 Grand Touring AWD	27	32	$25,495	$26,240
CX-3 Grand Touring FWD	29	34	$24,283	$24,990
CX-3 Sport AWD	27	32	$20,615	$21,210
CX-3 Sport FWD	29	34	$19,403	$19,960
CX-3 Touring AWD	27	32	$22,555	$23,210
CX-3 Touring FWD	29	34	$21,343	$21,960

Select style

AWD NISMO

Style	MPG City	MPG Hwy	Invoice	MSRP
JUKE AWD NISMO	26	30	$26,286	$27,230
JUKE AWD NISMO RS	25	29	$28,973	$30,020
JUKE AWD S	26	30	$21,459	$22,100
JUKE AWD SL	26	30	$26,007	$26,940
JUKE AWD SV	26	30	$23,559	$24,400
JUKE FWD NISMO	27	33	$23,973	$24,830
JUKE FWD NISMO RS	26	31	$27,047	$28,020
JUKE FWD S	28	32	$19,667	$20,250
JUKE FWD SL	28	32	$24,368	$25,240
JUKE FWD SV	28	32	$21,777	$22,550

Show Only Differences

Pricing

Invoice Price

$25,495

$26,286

Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price

$26,240

$27,230

Monthly Payment Estimate

$437 / month

$454 / month

The Car Connection's Take

TCC Rating

7.2

Read Our Full Review

5.0

Read Our Full Review

TCC’s Bottom Line

The 2017 Mazda CX-3 keeps the most attractive features from last year: its price and its handling.

The 2017 Nissan Juke is best considered as the sportiest pick among subcompact crossovers, but it does come at a price.

TCC Likes

Ample features and good value
Available all-wheel-drive system
Good handling and impressive performance for segment

Fun and funky good looks
Good outward visibility
Great steering

TCC Dislikes

No manual, paddle shifters only on top models
Not a lot of rear seat room
Monochrome gauges look cheap

Cramped interior
Poor gas mileage
Bounding, bouncy ride

Fuel Economy

City

27 mpg

26 mpg

Highway

32 mpg

30 mpg

Vehicle

EPA Classification

Compact Cars

Small Station Wagon

Interior Dimensions

Passenger Volume (ft³)

86.3

86.7

Second Hip Room (in)

48.4

Front Shoulder Room (in)

53.5

53.6

Second Head Room (in)

37.2

36.7

Passenger Capacity

Second Shoulder Room (in)

50.4

51.4

Front Leg Room (in)

41.7

42.1

Front Hip Room (in)

52.3

51.5

Second Leg Room (in)

32.1

Front Head Room (in)

37.6

39.6

Exterior Dimensions

Track Width, Front (in)

Min Ground Clearance (in)

6.2

6.6

Length, Overall (in)

168.3

163.8

Height, Overall (in)

60.9

61.8

Track Width, Rear (in)

59.9

59.3

Wheelbase (in)

101.2

99.6

Width, Max w/o mirrors (in)

69.6

69.7

Liftover Height (in)

30.7

Cargo Area Dimensions

Cargo Area Width @ Beltline (in)

39.4

55.5

Cargo Volume to Seat 2 (ft³)

10.1

10.5

Cargo Area Length @ Floor to Seat 2 (in)

30.9

26.6

Cargo Volume to Seat 1 (ft³)

42.3

35.9

Cargo Volume to Seat 3 (ft³)

10.1

10.5

Cargo Area Length @ Floor to Seat 1 (in)

56.7

Cargo Box (Area) Height (in)

26.8

Brakes

Front Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness (in)

11.6

11.7

Drum - Rear (Yes or )

Brake ABS System

4-Wheel

Disc - Rear (Yes or )

Yes

Rear Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness (in)

11.1

11.5

Brake Type

4-Wheel Disc

Rear Drum Diam x Width (in)

Disc - Front (Yes or )

Yes

Fuel Tank

Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx (gal)

11.9

11.8

Steering

Turning Diameter - Curb to Curb (ft)

34.8

35.1

Steering Type

Rack-Pinion

Tires

Front Tire Size

P215/50VR18

P225/45YR18

Spare Tire Size

Compact

Front Tire Order Code

Spare Tire Order Code

Rear Tire Size

P215/50VR18

P225/45YR18

Rear Tire Order Code

Weight Information

Base Curb Weight (lbs)

2952

3180

Wheels

Spare Wheel Size (in)

Compact

Rear Wheel Material

Aluminum

Rear Wheel Size (in)

18 X 7

Front Wheel Material

Aluminum

Spare Wheel Material

Steel

Front Wheel Size (in)

18 X 7

Electrical

Maximum Alternator Capacity (amps)

100

110

Engine

SAE Net Torque @ RPM

146 @ 2800

177 @ 2000

Engine Order Code

Displacement

2.0 L/122

1.6 L/99

SAE Net Horsepower @ RPM

146 @ 6000

188 @ 5600

Engine Type

Regular Unleaded I-4

Intercooled Turbo Premium Unleaded I-4

Fuel System

Gasoline Direct Injection

Mileage

Fuel Economy Est-Combined (MPG)

EPA Fuel Economy Est - Hwy (MPG)

EPA Fuel Economy Est - City (MPG)

Transmission

First Gear Ratio (:1)

3.55

2.63 - 0.38

Final Drive Axle Ratio (:1)

4.33

5.69

Third Gear Ratio (:1)

1.45

Trans Type

Drivetrain

All Wheel

Fifth Gear Ratio (:1)

0.71

Trans Description Cont. Again

Reverse Ratio (:1)

3.89

1.96

Second Gear Ratio (:1)

2.02

Trans Order Code

Fourth Gear Ratio (:1)

1.00

Trans Description Cont.

Automatic w/OD

CVT w/OD

Sixth Gear Ratio (:1)

0.60

Summary

Vehicle Name

Mazda CX-3

Nissan JUKE

Body Style

Sport Utility

Suspension

Suspension Type - Front (Cont.)

Strut

Suspension Type - Rear

Torsion Beam

Multi-Link

Suspension Type - Rear (Cont.)

Torsion Beam

Multi-Link

Suspension Type - Front

Strut

Emissions

Tons/yr of CO2 Emissions @ 15K mi/year

6.1

6.3

Crash Test Ratings

Overall Rating

Overall Frontal Barrier Crash Rating

Frontal Barrier Crash Rating Driver

Frontal Barrier Crash Rating Passenger

Overall Side Crash Rating

Side Barrier Rating

Side Barrier Rating Driver

Side Barrier Rating Passenger Rear Seat

Side Pole Rating Driver Front Seat

Combined Side Rating Front Seat

Combined Side Rating Rear Seat

Rollover Rating

Get FREE Dealer Quotes

From dealers near you

Go!

Compare 2017 Mazda CX-3 vs 2017 Nissan Juke

Get FREE Dealer Quotes

Add a Vehicle to Compare