Compare 2016 Land Rover Range Rover vs 2016 Mercedes-Benz GL Class vs 2016 Toyota Land Cruiser

2016 Land Rover Range Rover
X
2016 Mercedes-Benz GL Class
X
2016 Toyota Land Cruiser
X
Select style
4WD 4-Door
Style MPG City MPG Hwy Invoice MSRP
4WD 4-Door 17 23 $79,853 $84,950
4WD 4-Door Diesel 22 28 $81,263 $86,450
4WD 4-Door HSE 17 23 $86,433 $91,950
4WD 4-Door Diesel HSE 22 28 $87,843 $93,450
4WD 4-Door Supercharged 14 19 $97,003 $103,195
4WD 4-Door LWB Supercharged 14 19 $101,703 $108,195
4WD 4-Door Automaticbiography 14 19 $131,595 $139,995
4WD 4-Door LWB Automaticbiography 14 19 $136,295 $144,995
4WD 4-Door LWB SV Automaticbiography 14 19 $187,525 $199,495
4WD 4-Door LWB Holland & Holland 14 19 $229,830 $244,500
Select style
4MATIC 4-Door GL 350 BlueTEC
Style MPG City MPG Hwy Invoice MSRP
4MATIC 4-Door GL 350 BlueTEC 19 26 $60,032 $64,550
4MATIC 4-Door GL 450 17 21 $61,566 $66,200
4MATIC 4-Door GL 550 13 18 $84,909 $91,300
4MATIC 4-Door AMG GL 63 13 17 $112,623 $121,100
Select style
4-Door 4WD
Style MPG City MPG Hwy Invoice MSRP
4-Door 4WD 13 18 $75,024 $83,825
Pricing
Invoice Price
$79,853
$60,032
$75,024
Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price
$84,950
$64,550
$83,825
Monthly Payment Estimate
$1416 / month
$1076 / month
$1397 / month
The Car Connection's Take
TCC Rating
9.2
8.6
7.6
TCC’s Bottom Line
Few vehicles can equal the 2016 Land Rover Range Rover's levels of performance and luxury on pavement; even fewer can keep up with it off-road. The 2016 Mercedes-Benz GL-Class wraps up to seven people in luxury, and offers a pleasant ride with either diesel fuel economy or willing gasoline power. Better equipped and more expensive than ever, the 2016 Toyota Land Cruiser is an off-road beast that offers some on-road comfort for its likely suburban lifestyle.
TCC Likes
TCC Dislikes
Fuel Economy
City
17 mpg 19 mpg 13 mpg
Highway
23 mpg 26 mpg 18 mpg
Interior Dimensions
Front Shoulder Room (in)
60.7 58.5 61
Second Leg Room (in)
40.2 38.5 34.4
Front Leg Room (in)
42.5 40.3 42.9
Second Head Room (in)
39.2 40 38.9
Passenger Capacity
5 7 8
Second Shoulder Room (in)
59.4 58.3 61.1
Front Head Room (in)
39.3 41.2 38.3
Third Leg Room (in)
- 35 28.3
Third Head Room (in)
- 38.9 35.8
Third Shoulder Room (in)
- 50.5 62.3
Third Hip Room (in)
- - 56.6
Front Hip Room (in)
- - 59.4
Second Hip Room (in)
- - 58.6
Exterior Dimensions
Width, Max w/o mirrors (in)
78.1 84.3 77.9
Track Width, Front (in)
66.5 64.8 65
Min Ground Clearance (in)
8.7 8.5 9.1
Wheelbase (in)
115 121.1 112.2
Height, Overall (in)
72.3 72.8 74
Track Width, Rear (in)
66.3 65.5 64.8
Cargo Area Dimensions
Cargo Area Length @ Floor to Seat 1 (in)
78.1 84.1 -
Cargo Volume to Seat 3 (ft³)
32.1 16 16.1
Cargo Area Width @ Beltline (in)
50.8 - -
Cargo Box (Area) Height (in)
32.4 - -
Cargo Volume to Seat 2 (ft³)
32.1 49.4 43
Cargo Area Length @ Floor to Seat 2 (in)
43.3 52.4 -
Cargo Box Width @ Wheelhousings (in)
44.1 - -
Cargo Volume to Seat 1 (ft³)
71.7 93.8 81.7
Cargo Area Length @ Floor to Seat 3 (in)
- 19.7 -
Brakes
Drum - Rear (Yes or )
NA NA NA
Brake ABS System (Second Line)
4-Wheel 4-Wheel 4-Wheel
Disc - Rear (Yes or )
Yes Yes Yes
Rear Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness (in)
13.8 13.6 13.6
Brake ABS System
4-Wheel 4-Wheel 4-Wheel
Rear Drum Diam x Width (in)
NA NA NA
Disc - Front (Yes or )
Yes Yes Yes
Front Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness (in)
13.8 13.8 13.9
Brake Type
4-Wheel Disc 4-Wheel Disc 4-Wheel Disc
Fuel Tank
Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx (gal)
22.5 26.4 24.6
Steering
Turning Diameter - Curb to Curb (ft)
40.4 40.7 38.7
Steering Type
Rack-Pinion Rack-Pinion Rack-Pinion
Tires
Rear Tire Size
P235/65VR19 P275/55HR19 P285/60VR18
Rear Tire Order Code
NA NA NA
Front Tire Size
P235/65VR19 P275/55HR19 P285/60VR18
Spare Tire Size
Compact Compact Full-Size
Front Tire Order Code
NA NA NA
Spare Tire Order Code
NA NA NA
Trailering
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Tongue Wt. (lbs)
772 NA 810
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Trailer Wt. (lbs)
7716 NA 8100
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Trailer Wt. (lbs)
7716 NA 8100
Maximum Trailering Capacity (lbs)
7716 NA 8100
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Tongue Wt. (lbs)
772 NA 810
Weight Information
Gross Vehicle Weight Rating Cap (lbs)
6945 7165 7385
Gross Combined Wt Rating (lbs)
14661 - -
Wheels
Spare Wheel Material
Steel Steel Aluminum
Front Wheel Size (in)
19 X 8 19 X 8.5 18 X 8
Spare Wheel Size (in)
Compact Compact Full-Size
Rear Wheel Material
Aluminum Aluminum Aluminum
Rear Wheel Size (in)
19 X 8 19 X 8.5 18 X 8
Front Wheel Material
Aluminum Aluminum Aluminum
Electrical
Cold Cranking Amps @ 0° F (Primary)
800 - -
Cold Cranking Amps @ 0° F (2nd)
800 - -
Maximum Alternator Capacity (amps)
150 180 -
Engine
Fuel System
Gasoline Direct Injection Diesel Direct Injection Sequential MPI
SAE Net Torque @ RPM
332 @ 3500 455 @ 1600 401 @ 3600
Engine Order Code
NA NA NA
Displacement
3.0 L/184 3.0 L/182 5.7 L/346
Engine Oil Cooler
Regular Duty None Regular Duty
SAE Net Horsepower @ RPM
340 @ 6500 240 @ 3600 381 @ 5600
Engine Type
Intercooled Supercharger Premium Unleaded V-6 Intercooled Turbo Diesel V-6 Regular Unleaded V-8
Mileage
EPA Fuel Economy Est - Hwy (MPG)
23 26 18
EPA Fuel Economy Est - City (MPG)
17 19 13
Fuel Economy Est-Combined (MPG)
19 22 15
Transmission
Drivetrain
Four Wheel Drive All Wheel Drive Four Wheel Drive
Sixth Gear Ratio (:1)
1.00 0.82 1.00
First Gear Ratio (:1)
4.70 4.38 4.79
Trans PTO Access
No No No
Eighth Gear Ratio (:1)
0.67 - 0.67
Third Gear Ratio (:1)
2.10 1.92 1.84
Trans Type
8 7 8
Transfer Case Power Take Off
No No No
Fifth Gear Ratio (:1)
1.29 1.00 1.21
Trans Description Cont. Again
NA NA NA
Reverse Ratio (:1)
3.32 3.42 3.79
Seventh Gear Ratio (:1)
0.84 0.73 0.82
Second Gear Ratio (:1)
3.13 2.86 2.81
Trans Order Code
NA NA NA
Transfer Case Model
Electronic None Electronic
Fourth Gear Ratio (:1)
1.67 1.37 1.43
Trans Description Cont.
Automatic w/OD Automatic w/OD Automatic w/OD
Summary
Vehicle Name
Land Rover Range Rover Mercedes-Benz GL Toyota Land Cruiser
Body Code
S S S
Body Style
Sport Utility 4MATIC Sport Utility
Suspension
Axle Capacity - Rear (lbs)
3814 - -
Suspension Type - Front
Double Wishbone Double Wishbone Double Wishbone
Axle Type - Front
Independent Independent Independent
Axle Capacity - Front (lbs)
3307 - -
Suspension Type - Rear
Multi-Link Multi-Link Multi-Link
Axle Type - Rear
Independent Independent Rigid Axle
Axle Ratio (:1) - Rear
- 3.27 3.31
Axle Ratio (:1) - Front
- 3.27 3.31
Emissions
Tons/yr of CO2 Emissions @ 15K mi/year
9.2 9.4 11.8

Get FREE Dealer Quotes

From dealers near you
Go!