Compare 2014 Land Rover Range Rover vs 2015 Mercedes-Benz G Class vs 2015 Toyota Land Cruiser

2014 Land Rover Range Rover
X
2015 Mercedes-Benz G Class
X
2015 Toyota Land Cruiser
X
Select style
4WD 4-Door
Style MPG City MPG Hwy Invoice MSRP
Range Rover 4WD 4-Door 17 23 $76,219 $83,300
Range Rover 4WD 4-Door HSE 17 23 $80,794 $88,300
Range Rover 4WD 4-Door Supercharged 14 19 $91,591 $100,100
Range Rover 4WD 4-Door Supercharged Automaticbiography 14 19 $125,126 $136,750
Range Rover 4WD 4-Door Supercharged Automaticbiography Black LWB 14 19 $168,456 $184,105
Range Rover 4WD 4-Door Supercharged Automaticbiography LWB 14 19 $130,021 $142,100
Range Rover 4WD 4-Door Supercharged Ebony Edition 14 19 $109,418 $119,500
Range Rover 4WD 4-Door Supercharged LWB 14 19 $96,349 $105,300
Select style
4MATIC 4-Door G 550
Style MPG City MPG Hwy Invoice MSRP
G-Class 4MATIC 4-Door G 550 12 15 $107,322 $115,400
G-Class 4MATIC 4-Door G 63 AMG 12 14 $127,550 $137,150
Select style
4-Door 4WD
Style MPG City MPG Hwy Invoice MSRP
Land Cruiser 4-Door 4WD 13 18 $71,739 $80,155
Pricing
Invoice Price
$76,219
$107,322
$71,739
Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price
$83,300
$115,400
$80,155
Monthly Payment Estimate
$1388 / month
$1923 / month
$1336 / month
The Car Connection's Take
TCC Rating
9.2
7.8
7.6
TCC’s Bottom Line
The 2014 Land Rover Range Rover adds long-wheelbase comfort and Autobiography Black style to an already impressive all-purpose vehicle. The 2015 Mercedes-Benz G-Class is basically a last-generation S-Class interior riding on one of the most off-road-worthy chassis out there; it makes almost no sense, which is why people seem to gravitate toward it. The 2015 Toyota Land Cruiser is every bit the off-road machine that it always has been--but the price is so, so high.
TCC Likes
TCC Dislikes
Fuel Economy
City
17 mpg 12 mpg 13 mpg
Highway
23 mpg 15 mpg 18 mpg
Interior Dimensions
Front Leg Room (in)
42.5 52.5 42.9
Second Head Room (in)
39.2 40 38.9
Passenger Capacity
5 5 8
Second Shoulder Room (in)
59.4 56.3 61.1
Front Head Room (in)
39.3 42.2 38.3
Front Shoulder Room (in)
60.7 53.7 61
Second Leg Room (in)
40.2 41.9 34.4
Front Hip Room (in)
- 51.5 59.4
Second Hip Room (in)
- 53.9 58.6
Third Head Room (in)
- - 35.8
Third Shoulder Room (in)
- - 62.3
Third Leg Room (in)
- - 28.3
Third Hip Room (in)
- - 56.6
Exterior Dimensions
Track Width, Rear (in)
66.3 59.6 64.4
Wheelbase (in)
115 112.2 112.2
Width, Max w/o mirrors (in)
78.1 71.8 77.6
Track Width, Front (in)
66.5 59.6 64.6
Min Ground Clearance (in)
8.7 8.1 8.9
Length, Overall (in)
196.8 184.5 194.9
Height, Overall (in)
72.3 76.8 74
Cargo Area Dimensions
Cargo Box Width @ Wheelhousings (in)
44.1 - -
Cargo Volume to Seat 1 (ft³)
71.7 75.1 81.7
Cargo Area Length @ Floor to Seat 1 (in)
78.1 - -
Cargo Volume to Seat 3 (ft³)
32.1 40.3 16.1
Cargo Area Width @ Beltline (in)
50.8 - -
Cargo Box (Area) Height (in)
32.4 - -
Cargo Volume to Seat 2 (ft³)
32.1 40.3 43
Cargo Area Length @ Floor to Seat 2 (in)
43.3 - -
Brakes
Disc - Rear (Yes or )
Yes Yes Yes
Rear Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness (in)
13.8 10.7 13.6
Brake ABS System
4-Wheel 4-Wheel 4-Wheel
Rear Drum Diam x Width (in)
NA NA NA
Disc - Front (Yes or )
Yes Yes Yes
Front Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness (in)
13.8 12.4 13.4
Brake Type
4-Wheel Disc 4-Wheel Disc 4-Wheel Disc
Drum - Rear (Yes or )
NA NA NA
Brake ABS System (Second Line)
4-Wheel 4-Wheel 4-Wheel
Fuel Tank
Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx (gal)
27.7 29 24.6
Steering
Turning Diameter - Curb to Curb (ft)
40.4 44.6 38.7
Steering Type
Rack-Pinion Re-Circulating Ball Rack-Pinion
Tires
Front Tire Size
P235/65VR19 P265/60VR18 P285/60HR18
Spare Tire Size
Compact Full-Size Full-Size
Front Tire Order Code
NA NA NA
Spare Tire Order Code
NA NA NA
Rear Tire Size
P235/65VR19 P265/60VR18 P285/60HR18
Rear Tire Order Code
NA NA NA
Trailering
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Trailer Wt. (lbs)
7716 7000 8200
Maximum Trailering Capacity (lbs)
7716 7000 8200
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Tongue Wt. (lbs)
772 700 820
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Tongue Wt. (lbs)
772 700 820
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Trailer Wt. (lbs)
7716 7000 8200
Weight Information
Gross Combined Wt Rating (lbs)
14661 - 15885
Gross Vehicle Weight Rating Cap (lbs)
6945 7058 7275
Wheels
Spare Wheel Size (in)
Compact Full-Size Full-Size
Rear Wheel Material
Aluminum Aluminum Aluminum
Rear Wheel Size (in)
19 X 8 18 X 7.5 18 X 8
Front Wheel Material
Aluminum Aluminum Aluminum
Spare Wheel Material
Steel Aluminum Aluminum
Front Wheel Size (in)
19 X 8 18 X 7.5 18 X 8
Electrical
Cold Cranking Amps @ 0° F (2nd)
800 - -
Maximum Alternator Capacity (amps)
150 180 -
Cold Cranking Amps @ 0° F (Primary)
800 - -
Engine
Displacement
3.0 L/183 5.5 L/333 5.7 L/346
Engine Oil Cooler
Regular Duty Regular Duty Regular Duty
SAE Net Horsepower @ RPM
340 @ 6500 382 @ 6000 381 @ 5600
Engine Type
Intercooled Supercharger Premium Unleaded V-6 Premium Unleaded V-8 Regular Unleaded V-8
Fuel System
Gasoline Direct Injection Sequential MPI Sequential MPI
SAE Net Torque @ RPM
332 @ 3500 391 @ 2800 401 @ 3600
Engine Order Code
NA NA NA
Mileage
EPA Fuel Economy Est - City (MPG)
17 12 13
Fuel Economy Est-Combined (MPG)
19 13 15
EPA Fuel Economy Est - Hwy (MPG)
23 15 18
Transmission
Trans PTO Access
No No No
Seventh Gear Ratio (:1)
0.84 0.73 -
Third Gear Ratio (:1)
2.10 1.92 1.35
Trans Type
8 7 6
Transfer Case Power Take Off
No No No
Fifth Gear Ratio (:1)
1.29 1.00 0.73
Trans Description Cont. Again
NA NA NA
Reverse Ratio (:1)
3.32 3.42 3.06
Second Gear Ratio (:1)
3.13 2.86 1.96
Trans Order Code
NA NA NA
Transfer Case Model
Electronic Electronic Electronic
Eighth Gear Ratio (:1)
0.67 - -
Fourth Gear Ratio (:1)
1.67 1.37 1.00
Trans Description Cont.
Automatic w/OD Automatic w/OD Automatic w/OD
Drivetrain
Four Wheel Drive All Wheel Four Wheel Drive
Sixth Gear Ratio (:1)
1.00 0.82 0.59
First Gear Ratio (:1)
4.70 4.38 3.33
Summary
Vehicle Name
Land Rover Range Rover Mercedes-Benz G-Class Toyota Land Cruiser
Body Code
S S S
Body Style
Sport Utility Sport Utility Sport Utility
Suspension
Axle Capacity - Front (lbs)
3307 3086 -
Suspension Type - Rear
Multi-Link Trailing Link Multi-Link
Axle Type - Rear
Independent Rigid Axle Rigid Axle
Axle Capacity - Rear (lbs)
3814 4189 -
Suspension Type - Front
Double Wishbone Leading Link Double Wishbone
Axle Type - Front
Independent Non-Independent Independent
Axle Ratio (:1) - Front
- 4.38 3.91
Axle Ratio (:1) - Rear
- 4.38 3.91
Emissions
Tons/yr of CO2 Emissions @ 15K mi/year
9.5 13.5 11.8
EPA Greenhouse Gas Score
- 1.0 3.0

Get FREE Dealer Quotes

From dealers near you
Go!