2019 Honda HR-V vs 2019 Mazda CX-3

2019 Honda HR-V

2019 Mazda CX-3

Select style

EX 2WD CVT

Style	MPG City	MPG Hwy	Invoice	MSRP
HR-V EX 2WD CVT	28	34	$23,158	$23,820
HR-V EX AWD CVT	26	31	$24,514	$25,220
HR-V EX-L 2WD CVT	28	34	$24,708	$25,420
HR-V EX-L AWD CVT	26	31	$26,065	$26,820
HR-V LX 2WD CVT	28	34	$20,057	$20,620
HR-V LX AWD CVT	27	31	$21,413	$22,020
HR-V Sport 2WD CVT	28	34	$21,704	$22,320
HR-V Sport AWD CVT	26	31	$23,061	$23,720
HR-V Touring AWD CVT	26	31	$27,828	$28,640

Select style

Grand Touring AWD

Style	MPG City	MPG Hwy	Invoice	MSRP
CX-3 Grand Touring AWD	27	32	$26,364	$27,145
CX-3 Grand Touring FWD	29	34	$25,005	$25,745
CX-3 Sport AWD	27	32	$21,168	$21,790
CX-3 Sport FWD	29	34	$19,809	$20,390
CX-3 Touring AWD	27	32	$23,191	$23,875
CX-3 Touring FWD	29	34	$21,833	$22,475

Show Only Differences

Pricing

Invoice Price

$23,158

$26,364

Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price

$23,820

$27,145

Monthly Payment Estimate

$397 / month

$452 / month

The Car Connection's Take

TCC Rating

5.3

Read Our Full Review

5.8

Read Our Full Review

TCC’s Bottom Line

The 2019 Honda HR-V makes a perfect in-town companion with its spacious, flexible interior and good ride quality.

The 2019 Mazda CX-3 fails to launch in the crossover-SUV space race.

TCC Likes

Brilliant interior flexibility
Available active safety tech
Good value

Great, simple exterior shape
Good standard touchscreen
Standard advanced safety features

TCC Dislikes

Slow acceleration
Manual transmission a goner
Quirky looks not for all

Cramped rear seat
Not much cargo room with seats up
Finicky infotainment system

Fuel Economy

City

28 mpg

27 mpg

Highway

34 mpg

32 mpg

Vehicle

EPA Classification

Small Station Wagons

Compact Cars

Interior Dimensions

Front Leg Room (in)

41.2

41.7

Passenger Volume (ft³)

96.1

86.3

Front Hip Room (in)

53.1

52.3

Second Leg Room (in)

39.3

Front Head Room (in)

37.6

Passenger Capacity

Second Hip Room (in)

47.4

Front Shoulder Room (in)

56.8

53.5

Second Head Room (in)

38.3

37.2

Second Shoulder Room (in)

54.5

50.4

Exterior Dimensions

Track Width, Rear (in)

60.6

59.9

Wheelbase (in)

102.8

101.2

Width, Max w/o mirrors (in)

69.8

69.6

Track Width, Front (in)

60.4

Min Ground Clearance (in)

5.4

6.2

Length, Overall (in)

170.4

168.3

Height, Overall (in)

63.2

60.9

Cargo Area Dimensions

Cargo Volume to Seat 1 (ft³)

58.8

41.7

Cargo Volume to Seat 3 (ft³)

24.3

9.6

Cargo Volume to Seat 2 (ft³)

24.3

9.6

Cargo Box Width @ Wheelhousings (in)

39.4

Cargo Area Length @ Floor to Seat 2 (in)

30.9

Cargo Area Length @ Floor to Seat 1 (in)

56.7

Brakes

Rear Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness (in)

11.1

Brake Type

4-Wheel Disc

Rear Drum Diam x Width (in)

Disc - Front (Yes or )

Yes

Front Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness (in)

11.5

11.6

Drum - Rear (Yes or )

Brake ABS System

4-Wheel

Disc - Rear (Yes or )

Yes

Fuel Tank

Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx (gal)

13.2

11.9

Steering

Turning Diameter - Curb to Curb (ft)

37.4

34.8

Steering Type

Rack-Pinion

Tires

Rear Tire Size

P215/55VR17

P215/50VR18

Rear Tire Order Code

Front Tire Size

P215/55VR17

P215/50VR18

Spare Tire Size

Compact

Front Tire Order Code

Spare Tire Order Code

Weight Information

Base Curb Weight (lbs)

2959

2952

Wheels

Front Wheel Material

Aluminum

Spare Wheel Material

Steel

Front Wheel Size (in)

17 X 7.5

18 X 7

Spare Wheel Size (in)

Compact

Rear Wheel Material

Aluminum

Rear Wheel Size (in)

17 X 7.5

18 X 7

Engine

SAE Net Torque @ RPM

127 @ 4300

146 @ 2800

Engine Order Code

Displacement

1.8 L/110

2.0 L/122

SAE Net Horsepower @ RPM

141 @ 6500

148 @ 6000

Engine Type

Regular Unleaded I-4

Fuel System

Sequential MPI

Gasoline Direct Injection

Mileage

Fuel Economy Est-Combined (MPG)

EPA Fuel Economy Est - Hwy (MPG)

EPA Fuel Economy Est - City (MPG)

Transmission

First Gear Ratio (:1)

2.53 - 0.41

3.55

Final Drive Axle Ratio (:1)

5.44

4.33

Trans Type

Drivetrain

Front Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

Trans Description Cont. Again

Reverse Ratio (:1)

2.71

3.89

Trans Order Code

Trans Description Cont.

CVT w/OD

Automatic w/OD

Third Gear Ratio (:1)

1.45

Fifth Gear Ratio (:1)

0.71

Second Gear Ratio (:1)

2.02

Fourth Gear Ratio (:1)

1.00

Sixth Gear Ratio (:1)

0.60

Summary

Vehicle Name

Honda HR-V

Mazda CX-3

Body Style

Sport Utility

i-ACTIV AWD Sport Utility

Suspension

Suspension Type - Rear (Cont.)

Torsion Beam

Suspension Type - Front

Strut

Suspension Type - Front (Cont.)

Strut

Suspension Type - Rear

Torsion Beam

Emissions

Tons/yr of CO2 Emissions @ 15K mi/year

5.9

6.1

Electrical

Maximum Alternator Capacity (amps)

100

Crash Test Ratings

Overall Rating

Overall Frontal Barrier Crash Rating

Frontal Barrier Crash Rating Driver

Frontal Barrier Crash Rating Passenger

Overall Side Crash Rating

Side Barrier Rating

Side Barrier Rating Driver

Side Barrier Rating Passenger Rear Seat

Side Pole Rating Driver Front Seat

Combined Side Rating Front Seat

Combined Side Rating Rear Seat

Rollover Rating

Get FREE Dealer Quotes

From dealers near you

Go!

Compare 2019 Honda HR-V vs 2019 Mazda CX-3

Get FREE Dealer Quotes

Add a Vehicle to Compare