Compare 2018 Ford Ecosport vs 2018 Honda HR-V vs 2018 Toyota C-HR

2018 Ford Ecosport
X
2018 Honda HR-V
X
2018 Toyota C-HR
X
Select style
S 4WD
Style MPG City MPG Hwy Invoice MSRP
EcoSport S 4WD 23 29 $21,051 $21,590
EcoSport S FWD 27 29 $19,495 $19,995
EcoSport SE 4WD 23 29 $23,888 $24,500
EcoSport SE FWD 27 29 $22,425 $23,000
EcoSport SES 4WD 23 29 $26,208 $26,880
EcoSport Titanium 4WD 23 29 $26,647 $27,330
EcoSport Titanium FWD 27 29 $25,233 $25,880
Select style
EX 2WD CVT
Style MPG City MPG Hwy Invoice MSRP
HR-V EX 2WD CVT 28 34 $21,898 $22,520
HR-V EX 2WD Manual 25 33 $21,122 $21,720
HR-V EX AWD CVT 27 31 $23,254 $23,920
HR-V EX-L Navi 2WD CVT 28 34 $24,437 $25,140
HR-V EX-L Navi AWD CVT 27 31 $25,793 $26,540
HR-V LX 2WD CVT 28 34 $19,911 $20,470
HR-V LX 2WD Manual 25 33 $19,136 $19,670
HR-V LX AWD CVT 27 31 $21,268 $21,870
Select style
XLE FWD
Style MPG City MPG Hwy Invoice MSRP
C-HR XLE FWD 27 31 $21,039 $22,500
C-HR XLE Premium FWD 27 31 $22,768 $24,350
Pricing
Invoice Price
$21,051
$21,898
$21,039
Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price
$21,590
$22,520
$22,500
Monthly Payment Estimate
$360 / month
$375 / month
$375 / month
The Car Connection's Take
TCC Rating
5.2
6.5
6.0
TCC’s Bottom Line
The 2018 Ford EcoSport offers up cabin space and a low base price, but other Ford SUVs present a better value. The 2018 Honda HR-V blends great rear-seat flexibility and gas mileage, but it’s slow. The 2018 Toyota C-HR rides high, with astonishing looks that we like (you may differ); they're the selling point for a slow car that doesn't offer all-wheel drive despite a crossover label.
TCC Likes
TCC Dislikes
Fuel Economy
City
23 mpg 28 mpg 27 mpg
Highway
29 mpg 34 mpg 31 mpg
Vehicle
EPA Classification
Small Sport Utility Vehicles 4WD Small Sport Utility Vehicles 2WD Small Sport Utility Vehicles 2WD
Interior Dimensions
Passenger Capacity
5 5 5
Second Leg Room (in)
36.7 39.3 31.7
Front Head Room (in)
39.6 37.6 38.1
Second Hip Room (in)
50.9 47.4 48
Front Shoulder Room (in)
53.3 56.8 49
Second Head Room (in)
37.5 38.3 38.3
Passenger Volume (ft³)
91.1 96.1 83.8
Second Shoulder Room (in)
51.3 54.5 52.5
Front Leg Room (in)
42.9 41.2 43.5
Front Hip Room (in)
51.6 53.1 53
Exterior Dimensions
Height, Overall (in)
65.1 63.2 61.6
Track Width, Rear (in)
59.7 60.6 60.6
Width, Max w/o mirrors (in)
69.5 69.8 70.7
Track Width, Front (in)
59.8 60.4 60.6
Wheelbase (in)
99.2 102.8 103.9
Min Ground Clearance (in)
- - 5.9
Cargo Area Dimensions
Cargo Volume to Seat 3 (ft³)
20.9 24.3 19
Cargo Volume to Seat 2 (ft³)
20.9 24.3 19
Cargo Volume to Seat 1 (ft³)
50 58.8 36.4
Brakes
Drum - Rear (Yes or )
NA NA NA
Brake ABS System
4-Wheel 4-Wheel 4-Wheel
Disc - Rear (Yes or )
Yes Yes Yes
Brake Type
4-Wheel Disc 4-Wheel Disc 4-Wheel Disc
Disc - Front (Yes or )
Yes Yes Yes
Front Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness (in)
- 11.5 11.8
Rear Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness (in)
- 11.1 11.1
Rear Drum Diam x Width (in)
- NA NA
Fuel Tank
Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx (gal)
13.6 13.2 13.2
Steering
Turning Diameter - Curb to Curb (ft)
35 37.4 34.2
Steering Type
Rack-Pinion Rack-Pinion Rack-Pinion
Tires
Front Tire Size
P205/60HR16 P215/55VR17 P225/50VR18
Spare Tire Size
NA Compact Compact
Front Tire Order Code
NA NA NA
Spare Tire Order Code
NA NA NA
Rear Tire Size
P205/60HR16 P215/55VR17 P225/50VR18
Rear Tire Order Code
NA NA NA
Trailering
Maximum Trailering Capacity (lbs)
2000 - -
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Tongue Wt. (lbs)
200 - -
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Tongue Wt. (lbs)
200 - -
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Trailer Wt. (lbs)
2000 - -
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Trailer Wt. (lbs)
2000 - -
Weight Information
Base Curb Weight (lbs)
3300 2933 3300
Wheels
Spare Wheel Size (in)
NA Compact Compact
Rear Wheel Material
Aluminum Aluminum Aluminum
Rear Wheel Size (in)
16 X 6.5 17 X 6.5 18 X 7
Front Wheel Material
Aluminum Aluminum Aluminum
Spare Wheel Material
NA Steel Steel
Front Wheel Size (in)
16 X 6.5 17 X 6.5 18 X 7
Engine
SAE Net Horsepower @ RPM
166 @ 6500 141 @ 6500 144 @ 6100
Engine Type
Regular Unleaded I-4 Regular Unleaded I-4 Regular Unleaded I-4
Fuel System
Gasoline Direct Injection Sequential MPI Sequential MPI
SAE Net Torque @ RPM
149 @ 4500 127 @ 4300 139 @ 3900
Engine Order Code
99L NA NA
Displacement
2.0 L/122 1.8 L/110 2.0 L/121
Mileage
EPA Fuel Economy Est - Hwy (MPG)
29 34 31
EPA Fuel Economy Est - City (MPG)
23 28 27
Fuel Economy Est-Combined (MPG)
25 31 29
Transmission
Trans Description Cont. Again
NA NA NA
Reverse Ratio (:1)
2.94 2.71 -
Second Gear Ratio (:1)
2.96 - -
Trans Order Code
446 NA NA
Fourth Gear Ratio (:1)
1.44 - -
Trans Description Cont.
Automatic w/OD CVT w/OD CVT w/OD
Sixth Gear Ratio (:1)
0.75 - -
First Gear Ratio (:1)
4.85 2.53 - 0.41 -
Final Drive Axle Ratio (:1)
3.51 5.44 -
Third Gear Ratio (:1)
1.91 - -
Trans Type
6 1 1
Drivetrain
Four Wheel Drive Front Wheel Drive Front Wheel Drive
Fifth Gear Ratio (:1)
1.00 - -
Summary
Body Style
Sport Utility Sport Utility Sport Utility
Vehicle Name
Ford EcoSport Honda HR-V Toyota C-HR
Suspension
Suspension Type - Front (Cont.)
Strut Strut Strut
Suspension Type - Rear
Torsion Beam Torsion Beam Double Wishbone
Suspension Type - Rear (Cont.)
Torsion Beam Torsion Beam Double Wishbone
Suspension Type - Front
Strut Strut Strut
Emissions
Tons/yr of CO2 Emissions @ 15K mi/year
7.0 5.7 6.0
Crash Test Ratings
Overall Rating
-
Overall Frontal Barrier Crash Rating
-
Frontal Barrier Crash Rating Driver
-
Frontal Barrier Crash Rating Passenger
-
Overall Side Crash Rating
-
Side Barrier Rating
-
Side Barrier Rating Driver
-
Side Barrier Rating Passenger Rear Seat
-
Side Pole Rating Driver Front Seat
-
Combined Side Rating Front Seat
-
Combined Side Rating Rear Seat
-
Rollover Rating
-

Get FREE Dealer Quotes

From dealers near you
Go!