2015 Ford C-Max vs 2015 Mitsubishi Outlander Sport

2015 Ford C-Max

2015 Mitsubishi Outlander Sport

Select style

5-Door HB SEL

Style	MPG City	MPG Hwy	Invoice	MSRP
C-Max Energi 5-Door HB SEL	40	36	$29,626	$31,770
C-Max Hybrid 5-Door HB SE	42	36	$22,539	$24,170
C-Max Hybrid 5-Door HB SEL	42	36	$25,337	$27,170

Select style

2WD 4-Door CVT 2.4 ES

Style	MPG City	MPG Hwy	Invoice	MSRP
Outlander Sport 2WD 4-Door CVT 2.4 ES	23	28	$20,585	$21,295
Outlander Sport 2WD 4-Door CVT 2.4 GT	23	28	$22,808	$23,595
Outlander Sport 2WD 4-Door CVT ES	25	32	$18,941	$19,595
Outlander Sport 2WD 4-Door CVT SE	25	32	$22,035	$22,795
Outlander Sport 2WD 4-Door Manual ES	24	30	$18,941	$19,595
Outlander Sport AWD 4-Door CVT 2.4 ES	23	26	$21,938	$22,695
Outlander Sport AWD 4-Door CVT 2.4 GT	23	26	$24,162	$24,995
Outlander Sport AWD 4-Door CVT ES	24	30	$21,455	$22,195
Outlander Sport AWD 4-Door CVT SE	24	30	$23,388	$24,195

Show Only Differences

Pricing

Invoice Price

$29,626

$20,585

Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price

$31,770

$21,295

Monthly Payment Estimate

$530 / month

$355 / month

The Car Connection's Take

TCC Rating

7.8

Read Our Full Review

7.4

Read Our Full Review

TCC’s Bottom Line

With their stylish interiors and perky driving feel, the 2015 Ford C-Max Hybrid and C-Max Energi are somewhat sportier alternatives to the Toyota Prius lineup.

The 2015 Mitsubishi Outlander Sport isn't as refined inside as it looks from its exterior, but it maneuvers well and offers a surprising amount of functional space.

TCC Likes

Like the Prius, but a little sportier
Stylish, premium-look inside
Quiet cabin

Nimble, responsive feel
Spacious, versatile layout
Clean, simple dash layout

TCC Dislikes

A little too van-like?
Some controls almost out of view
Load floor not in line with tailgate opening

CVT is sluggish on the highway
Drab interior
Noisy inside (although improved)

Fuel Economy

City

40 mpg

23 mpg

Highway

36 mpg

28 mpg

Vehicle

EPA Classification

Mid-Size Cars

Small SUV 2WD

Interior Dimensions

Front Hip Room (in)

54.3

52.1

Passenger Volume (ft³)

99.7

97.5

Second Leg Room (in)

36.5

36.3

Front Head Room (in)

39.4

Second Hip Room (in)

51.9

51.6

Front Shoulder Room (in)

55.9

56.2

Passenger Capacity

Second Head Room (in)

39.4

37.9

Second Shoulder Room (in)

55.2

55.5

Front Leg Room (in)

43.1

41.6

Exterior Dimensions

Width, Max w/o mirrors (in)

69.7

Track Width, Front (in)

60.5

Min Ground Clearance (in)

5.5

8.5

Length, Overall (in)

173.6

169.1

Height, Overall (in)

63.8

64.2

Track Width, Rear (in)

60.4

Wheelbase (in)

104.3

105.1

Cargo Area Dimensions

Cargo Volume with Rear Seat Up (ft³)

19.2

Cargo Volume with Rear Seat Down (ft³)

42.8

Cargo Volume to Seat 3 (ft³)

21.7

Cargo Volume to Seat 2 (ft³)

21.7

Cargo Volume to Seat 1 (ft³)

49.5

Brakes

Rear Drum Diam x Width (in)

Disc - Front (Yes or )

Yes

Front Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness (in)

11.8

11.6

Drum - Rear (Yes or )

Brake ABS System

4-Wheel

Disc - Rear (Yes or )

Yes

Rear Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness (in)

11.9

Brake Type

4-Wheel Disc

Fuel Tank

Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx (gal)

16.6

Steering

Turning Diameter - Curb to Curb (ft)

38.4

34.8

Steering Type

Rack-Pinion

Tires

Rear Tire Order Code

Front Tire Size

P225/50VR17

P225/55HR18

Spare Tire Size

Compact

Front Tire Order Code

Spare Tire Order Code

Rear Tire Size

P225/50VR17

P225/55HR18

Weight Information

Base Curb Weight (lbs)

3859

3098

Wheels

Spare Wheel Material

Steel

Front Wheel Size (in)

17 X 7

18 X 7

Spare Wheel Size (in)

Compact

Rear Wheel Material

Aluminum

Rear Wheel Size (in)

17 X 7

18 X 7

Front Wheel Material

Aluminum

Electrical

Cold Cranking Amps @ 0° F (Primary)

390

Maximum Alternator Capacity (amps)

130

Engine

SAE Net Torque @ RPM

129 @ 4000

162 @ 4200

Engine Order Code

99U

Displacement

2.0 L/122

2.4 L/144

SAE Net Horsepower @ RPM

188 @ 6000

166 @ 6000

Engine Type

Gas/Electric I-4

Regular Unleaded I-4

Fuel System

Sequential MPI

Mileage

Fuel Economy Est-Combined (MPG)

EPA MPG Equivalent - Combined

EPA Fuel Economy Est - Hwy (MPG)

EPA Fuel Economy Est - City (MPG)

Battery Range (mi)

Transmission

Final Drive Axle Ratio (:1)

2.57

4.24

Trans Type

Drivetrain

Front Wheel Drive

Trans Description Cont. Again

Trans Order Code

Trans Description Cont.

CVT w/OD

First Gear Ratio (:1)

2.63 - 0.50

Reverse Ratio (:1)

1.96

Summary

Vehicle Name

Ford C-Max Energi

Mitsubishi Outlander Sport

Body Style

Hatchback

Sport Utility

Suspension

Suspension Type - Front

Strut

Suspension Type - Front (Cont.)

Strut

Suspension Type - Rear

Multi-Link

Suspension Type - Rear (Cont.)

Multi-Link

Emissions

Tons/yr of CO2 Emissions @ 15K mi/year

7.1

Crash Test Ratings

Overall Rating

Overall Frontal Barrier Crash Rating

Frontal Barrier Crash Rating Driver

Frontal Barrier Crash Rating Passenger

Overall Side Crash Rating

Side Barrier Rating

Side Barrier Rating Driver

Side Barrier Rating Passenger Rear Seat

Side Pole Rating Driver Front Seat

Combined Side Rating Front Seat

Combined Side Rating Rear Seat

Rollover Rating

Get FREE Dealer Quotes

From dealers near you

Go!

Compare 2015 Ford C-Max vs 2015 Mitsubishi Outlander Sport

Get FREE Dealer Quotes

Add a Vehicle to Compare