Compare 2015 Ford C-Max vs 2015 Mitsubishi Outlander Sport

2015 Ford C-Max
2015 Mitsubishi Outlander Sport
Add Vehicle
Select style
5-Door HB SEL
Style MPG City MPG Hwy Invoice MSRP
C-Max Energi 5-Door HB SEL 40 36 $29,626 $31,770
C-Max Hybrid 5-Door HB SE 42 36 $22,539 $24,170
C-Max Hybrid 5-Door HB SEL 42 36 $25,337 $27,170
Select style
2WD 4-Door CVT 2.4 ES
Style MPG City MPG Hwy Invoice MSRP
Outlander Sport 2WD 4-Door CVT 2.4 ES 23 28 $20,585 $21,295
Outlander Sport 2WD 4-Door CVT 2.4 GT 23 28 $22,808 $23,595
Outlander Sport 2WD 4-Door CVT ES 25 32 $18,941 $19,595
Outlander Sport 2WD 4-Door CVT SE 25 32 $22,035 $22,795
Outlander Sport 2WD 4-Door Manual ES 24 30 $18,941 $19,595
Outlander Sport AWD 4-Door CVT 2.4 ES 23 26 $21,938 $22,695
Outlander Sport AWD 4-Door CVT 2.4 GT 23 26 $24,162 $24,995
Outlander Sport AWD 4-Door CVT ES 24 30 $21,455 $22,195
Outlander Sport AWD 4-Door CVT SE 24 30 $23,388 $24,195
Pricing
Invoice Price
$29,626
$20,585
Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price
$31,770
$21,295
Monthly Payment Estimate
$530 / month
$355 / month
The Car Connection's Take
TCC Rating
7.8
7.4
TCC’s Bottom Line
With their stylish interiors and perky driving feel, the 2015 Ford C-Max Hybrid and C-Max Energi are somewhat sportier alternatives to the Toyota Prius lineup. The 2015 Mitsubishi Outlander Sport isn't as refined inside as it looks from its exterior, but it maneuvers well and offers a surprising amount of functional space.
TCC Likes
TCC Dislikes
Fuel Economy
City
40 mpg 23 mpg
Highway
36 mpg 28 mpg
Vehicle
EPA Classification
Midsize Cars Small SUV 2WD
Interior Dimensions
Front Hip Room (in)
54.3 52.1
Passenger Volume (ft³)
99.7 97.5
Second Leg Room (in)
36.5 36.3
Front Head Room (in)
41 39.4
Second Hip Room (in)
51.9 51.6
Front Shoulder Room (in)
55.9 56.2
Passenger Capacity
5 5
Second Head Room (in)
39.4 37.9
Second Shoulder Room (in)
55.2 55.5
Front Leg Room (in)
43.1 41.6
Exterior Dimensions
Width, Max w/o mirrors (in)
72 69.7
Track Width, Front (in)
60.5 60
Min Ground Clearance (in)
5.5 8.5
Length, Overall (in)
173.6 169.1
Height, Overall (in)
63.8 64.2
Track Width, Rear (in)
60.4 60
Wheelbase (in)
104.3 105.1
Cargo Area Dimensions
Cargo Volume with Rear Seat Up (ft³)
19.2 -
Cargo Volume with Rear Seat Down (ft³)
42.8 -
Cargo Volume to Seat 3 (ft³)
- 21.7
Cargo Volume to Seat 2 (ft³)
- 21.7
Cargo Volume to Seat 1 (ft³)
- 49.5
Brakes
Rear Drum Diam x Width (in)
NA NA
Disc - Front (Yes or )
Yes Yes
Front Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness (in)
11.8 11.6
Drum - Rear (Yes or )
NA NA
Brake ABS System
4-Wheel 4-Wheel
Disc - Rear (Yes or )
Yes Yes
Rear Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness (in)
11 11.9
Brake Type
4-Wheel Disc 4-Wheel Disc
Fuel Tank
Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx (gal)
14 16.6
Steering
Turning Diameter - Curb to Curb (ft)
38.4 34.8
Steering Type
Rack-Pinion Rack-Pinion
Tires
Rear Tire Order Code
NA NA
Front Tire Size
P225/50VR17 P225/55HR18
Spare Tire Size
NA Compact
Front Tire Order Code
NA NA
Spare Tire Order Code
NA NA
Rear Tire Size
P225/50VR17 P225/55HR18
Weight Information
Base Curb Weight (lbs)
3859 3098
Wheels
Spare Wheel Material
NA Steel
Front Wheel Size (in)
17 X 7 18 X 7
Spare Wheel Size (in)
NA Compact
Rear Wheel Material
Aluminum Aluminum
Rear Wheel Size (in)
17 X 7 18 X 7
Front Wheel Material
Aluminum Aluminum
Electrical
Cold Cranking Amps @ 0° F (Primary)
390 -
Maximum Alternator Capacity (amps)
- 130
Engine
SAE Net Torque @ RPM
129 @ 4000 162 @ 4200
Engine Order Code
99U NA
Displacement
2.0 L/122 2.4 L/144
SAE Net Horsepower @ RPM
188 @ 6000 166 @ 6000
Engine Type
Gas/Electric I-4 Regular Unleaded I-4
Fuel System
Sequential MPI Sequential MPI
Mileage
Fuel Economy Est-Combined (MPG)
38 25
EPA MPG Equivalent - Combined
88 -
EPA Fuel Economy Est - Hwy (MPG)
36 28
EPA Fuel Economy Est - City (MPG)
40 23
Estimated Battery Range (mi)
20 -
Transmission
Final Drive Axle Ratio (:1)
2.57 4.24
Trans Type
1 6
Drivetrain
Front Wheel Drive Front Wheel Drive
Trans Description Cont. Again
NA NA
Trans Order Code
NA NA
Trans Description Cont.
CVT w/OD CVT w/OD
First Gear Ratio (:1)
- 2.63 - 0.50
Reverse Ratio (:1)
- 1.96
Summary
Vehicle Name
Ford C-Max Energi Mitsubishi Outlander Sport
Body Style
Hatchback Sport Utility
Suspension
Suspension Type - Front
Strut Strut
Suspension Type - Front (Cont.)
Strut Strut
Suspension Type - Rear
Multi-Link Multi-Link
Suspension Type - Rear (Cont.)
Multi-Link Multi-Link
Emissions
Tons/yr of CO2 Emissions @ 15K mi/year
- 7.1
Crash Test Ratings
Overall Rating
Overall Frontal Barrier Crash Rating
Frontal Barrier Crash Rating Driver
Frontal Barrier Crash Rating Passenger
Overall Side Crash Rating
Side Barrier Rating
Side Barrier Rating Driver
Side Barrier Rating Passenger Rear Seat
Side Pole Rating Driver Front Seat
Combined Side Rating Front Seat
Combined Side Rating Rear Seat
Rollover Rating

Get FREE Dealer Quotes

From dealers near you
Go!

Add a Vehicle to Compare

Select a vehicle below
Please choose a make.
Please choose a model.
Please choose a year.
Continue