2017 FIAT 500X vs 2017 Mazda CX-3

2017 FIAT 500X

2017 Mazda CX-3

Select style

Lounge AWD

Style	MPG City	MPG Hwy	Invoice	MSRP
500X Lounge AWD	21	29	$26,168	$27,050
500X Lounge FWD	22	30	$24,351	$25,150
500X Pop AWD	21	29	$23,634	$23,890
500X Pop FWD	25	33	$19,895	$19,995
500X Trekking AWD	21	29	$24,494	$25,250
500X Trekking FWD	22	30	$22,677	$23,350
500X Urbana Edition AWD	21	29	$24,494	$25,250
500X Urbana Edition FWD	22	30	$22,677	$23,350

Select style

Grand Touring AWD

Style	MPG City	MPG Hwy	Invoice	MSRP
CX-3 Grand Touring AWD	27	32	$25,495	$26,240
CX-3 Grand Touring FWD	29	34	$24,283	$24,990
CX-3 Sport AWD	27	32	$20,615	$21,210
CX-3 Sport FWD	29	34	$19,403	$19,960
CX-3 Touring AWD	27	32	$22,555	$23,210
CX-3 Touring FWD	29	34	$21,343	$21,960

Show Only Differences

Pricing

Invoice Price

$26,168

$25,495

Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price

$27,050

$26,240

Monthly Payment Estimate

$451 / month

$437 / month

The Car Connection's Take

TCC Rating

6.5

Read Our Full Review

7.2

Read Our Full Review

TCC’s Bottom Line

With more personality than most small crossovers, the Fiat 500X is definitely worth a look.

The 2017 Mazda CX-3 keeps the most attractive features from last year: its price and its handling.

TCC Likes

Tidy exterior styling
Just right proportions
Above average ride and handling

Ample features and good value
Available all-wheel-drive system
Good handling and impressive performance for segment

TCC Dislikes

Automatic gearbox can be touchy
Sunroof steals head room, especially in back
Small infotainment screens

No manual, paddle shifters only on top models
Not a lot of rear seat room
Monochrome gauges look cheap

Fuel Economy

City

21 mpg

27 mpg

Highway

29 mpg

32 mpg

Vehicle

EPA Classification

Small Sport Utility Vehicles 4WD

Compact Cars

Interior Dimensions

Passenger Volume (ft³)

100.1

86.3

Second Shoulder Room (in)

52.8

50.4

Front Leg Room (in)

41.4

41.7

Front Hip Room (in)

53.3

52.3

Passenger Capacity

Second Leg Room (in)

34.8

Front Head Room (in)

39.1

37.6

Second Hip Room (in)

52.2

Front Shoulder Room (in)

54.3

53.5

Second Head Room (in)

37.8

37.2

Exterior Dimensions

Height, Overall (in)

63.1

60.9

Track Width, Rear (in)

60.7

59.9

Wheelbase (in)

101.2

Width, Max w/o mirrors (in)

70.7

69.6

Track Width, Front (in)

60.7

Liftover Height (in)

29.8

Length, Overall (in)

167.2

168.3

Min Ground Clearance (in)

6.2

Cargo Area Dimensions

Cargo Volume to Seat 2 (ft³)

14.1

10.1

Cargo Volume to Seat 1 (ft³)

39.8

42.3

Cargo Volume to Seat 3 (ft³)

14.1

10.1

Cargo Area Width @ Beltline (in)

39.4

Cargo Area Length @ Floor to Seat 2 (in)

30.9

Cargo Area Length @ Floor to Seat 1 (in)

56.7

Brakes

Disc - Rear (Yes or )

Yes

Rear Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness (in)

11.1

Brake Type

4-Wheel Disc

Rear Drum Diam x Width (in)

Disc - Front (Yes or )

Yes

Front Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness (in)

11.6

Drum - Rear (Yes or )

Brake ABS System

4-Wheel

Fuel Tank

Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx (gal)

13.2

11.9

Steering

Steering Type

Rack-Pinion

Turning Diameter - Curb to Curb (ft)

36.3

34.8

Tires

Spare Tire Order Code

Rear Tire Size

P215/60HR17

P215/50VR18

Rear Tire Order Code

TTU

Front Tire Size

P215/60HR17

P215/50VR18

Spare Tire Size

Compact

Front Tire Order Code

TTU

Weight Information

Base Curb Weight (lbs)

2967

2952

Wheels

Rear Wheel Size (in)

17 X 7

18 X 7

Front Wheel Material

Aluminum

Spare Wheel Material

Steel

Front Wheel Size (in)

17 X 7

18 X 7

Spare Wheel Size (in)

Compact

Rear Wheel Material

Aluminum

Electrical

Cold Cranking Amps @ 0° F (Primary)

500

Maximum Alternator Capacity (amps)

160

100

Engine

SAE Net Torque @ RPM

175 @ 3900

146 @ 2800

Engine Order Code

ED6

Displacement

2.4 L/144

2.0 L/122

SAE Net Horsepower @ RPM

180 @ 6400

146 @ 6000

Engine Type

Regular Unleaded I-4

Fuel System

Sequential MPI

Gasoline Direct Injection

Mileage

Fuel Economy Est-Combined (MPG)

EPA Fuel Economy Est - Hwy (MPG)

EPA Fuel Economy Est - City (MPG)

Transmission

First Gear Ratio (:1)

4.71

3.55

Final Drive Axle Ratio (:1)

3.73

4.33

Third Gear Ratio (:1)

1.91

1.45

Trans Type

Seventh Gear Ratio (:1)

0.70

Drivetrain

All Wheel

Fifth Gear Ratio (:1)

1.00

0.71

Trans Description Cont. Again

Reverse Ratio (:1)

3.83

3.89

Second Gear Ratio (:1)

2.84

2.02

Trans Order Code

DFH

Fourth Gear Ratio (:1)

1.38

1.00

Trans Description Cont.

Automatic w/OD

Eighth Gear Ratio (:1)

0.58

Sixth Gear Ratio (:1)

0.81

0.60

Summary

Vehicle Name

FIAT 500X

Mazda CX-3

Body Style

Sport Utility

Suspension

Suspension Type - Rear

Multi-Link

Torsion Beam

Suspension Type - Rear (Cont.)

Multi-Link

Torsion Beam

Suspension Type - Front

Strut

Suspension Type - Front (Cont.)

Strut

Emissions

Tons/yr of CO2 Emissions @ 15K mi/year

7.3

6.1

Crash Test Ratings

Overall Rating

Overall Frontal Barrier Crash Rating

Frontal Barrier Crash Rating Driver

Frontal Barrier Crash Rating Passenger

Overall Side Crash Rating

Side Barrier Rating

Side Barrier Rating Driver

Side Barrier Rating Passenger Rear Seat

Side Pole Rating Driver Front Seat

Combined Side Rating Front Seat

Combined Side Rating Rear Seat

Rollover Rating

Get FREE Dealer Quotes

From dealers near you

Go!

Compare 2017 FIAT 500X vs 2017 Mazda CX-3

Get FREE Dealer Quotes

Add a Vehicle to Compare