2020 BMW X4 vs 2020 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque

2020 BMW X4

2020 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque

Select style

M40i Sports Activity Coupe

Style	MPG City	MPG Hwy	Invoice	MSRP
X4 M40i Sports Activity Coupe	21	27	$57,230	$61,000
X4 xDrive30i Sports Activity Coupe	23	28	$48,025	$51,100
X4 M Competition Sports Activity Coupe	14	19	$75,270	$80,400
X4 M Sports Activity Coupe	14	19	$68,760	$73,400

Select style

P250 First Edition

Style	MPG City	MPG Hwy	Invoice	MSRP
Range Rover Evoque P250 First Edition	20	27	$53,439	$56,850
Range Rover Evoque P250 S	20	27	$40,091	$42,650
Range Rover Evoque P250 SE	20	27	$44,368	$47,200
Range Rover Evoque P300 R-Dynamic HSE	21	26	$52,452	$55,800
Range Rover Evoque P300 R-Dynamic S	21	26	$43,804	$46,600
Range Rover Evoque P300 R-Dynamic SE	21	26	$48,081	$51,150

Show Only Differences

Pricing

Invoice Price

$57,230

$53,439

Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price

$61,000

$56,850

Monthly Payment Estimate

$1017 / month

$948 / month

The Car Connection's Take

TCC Rating

6.6

Read Our Full Review

6.4

Read Our Full Review

TCC’s Bottom Line

The 2020 BMW X4 is a crossover coupe that defies convention—no, no, actually it outruns convention.

The 2020 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque emerges from finishing school with more refined road manners.

TCC Likes

Exceptional exterior
Great performance
Quality interior

Still a fashionista
Turbo-4’s smoother performance
A more composed ride

TCC Dislikes

Expensive
Style dents practicality
Rear seat leg room is cramped

Snug interior space
No mpg gain for mild-hybrid
Less crisp bodywork

Fuel Economy

City

21 mpg

20 mpg

Highway

27 mpg

Vehicle

EPA Classification

Small SUV 4WD

Interior Dimensions

Passenger Volume (ft³)

97.8

Second Head Room (in)

37.2

38.3

Second Shoulder Room (in)

55.4

Front Head Room (in)

39.5

38.9

Passenger Capacity

Front Shoulder Room (in)

57.5

56.6

Second Leg Room (in)

35.5

33.8

Front Leg Room (in)

40.7

Exterior Dimensions

Width, Max w/o mirrors (in)

76.3

Track Width, Front (in)

63.2

Min Ground Clearance (in)

8.3

Length, Overall (in)

187.4

172.1

Height, Overall (in)

63.8

64.9

Track Width, Rear (in)

64.8

64.2

Wheelbase (in)

112.8

105.6

Cargo Area Dimensions

Cargo Volume to Seat 1 (ft³)

50.5

Cargo Volume to Seat 3 (ft³)

18.5

21.5

Cargo Volume to Seat 2 (ft³)

18.5

21.5

Cargo Area Length @ Floor to Seat 2 (in)

31.4

Cargo Box Width @ Wheelhousings (in)

41.5

Cargo Area Length @ Floor to Seat 1 (in)

Cargo Area Width @ Beltline (in)

51.2

Cargo Box (Area) Height (in)

27.2

Brakes

Rear Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness (in)

13.5

12.6

Brake Type

4-Wheel Disc

Rear Drum Diam x Width (in)

Disc - Front (Yes or )

Yes

Front Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness (in)

13.7

Drum - Rear (Yes or )

Brake ABS System

4-Wheel

Disc - Rear (Yes or )

Yes

Fuel Tank

Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx (gal)

17.2

17.7

Steering

Turning Diameter - Curb to Curb (ft)

38.1

Steering Type

Rack-Pinion

Tires

Rear Tire Size

P245/50HR19

P235/50WR20

Rear Tire Order Code

Front Tire Size

P245/50HR19

P235/50WR20

Spare Tire Size

Compact

Front Tire Order Code

Spare Tire Order Code

Weight Information

Base Curb Weight (lbs)

4323

3935

Wheels

Front Wheel Material

Aluminum

Spare Wheel Material

Steel

Front Wheel Size (in)

19 X 7.5

20 X 8

Spare Wheel Size (in)

Compact

Rear Wheel Material

Aluminum

Rear Wheel Size (in)

19 X 7.5

20 X 8

Engine

SAE Net Torque @ RPM

365 @ 1520

269 @ 1400

Engine Order Code

Displacement

3.0 L/183

2.0 L/122

SAE Net Horsepower @ RPM

382 @ 5800

246 @ 5500

Engine Type

Intercooled Turbo Premium Unleaded I-6

Intercooled Turbo Premium Unleaded I-4

Fuel System

Gasoline Direct Injection

Mileage

Fuel Economy Est-Combined (MPG)

EPA Fuel Economy Est - Hwy (MPG)

EPA Fuel Economy Est - City (MPG)

Transmission

First Gear Ratio (:1)

5.00

4.71

Final Drive Axle Ratio (:1)

3.38

4.54

Third Gear Ratio (:1)

2.14

1.91

Trans Type

Drivetrain

All Wheel Drive

Fifth Gear Ratio (:1)

1.31

1.00

Trans Description Cont. Again

Eighth Gear Ratio (:1)

0.64

0.58

Reverse Ratio (:1)

3.46

3.83

Second Gear Ratio (:1)

3.20

2.84

Trans Order Code

2TB

Fourth Gear Ratio (:1)

1.72

1.38

Trans Description Cont.

Automatic w/OD

Seventh Gear Ratio (:1)

0.82

0.70

Sixth Gear Ratio (:1)

1.00

0.81

Summary

Vehicle Name

BMW X4

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque

Body Style

Sports Activity Coupe

Sport Utility

Suspension

Suspension Type - Rear (Cont.)

Multi-Link

Suspension Type - Front

Strut

Suspension Type - Front (Cont.)

Strut

Suspension Type - Rear

Multi-Link

Emissions

Tons/yr of CO2 Emissions @ 15K mi/year

7.7

Trailering

Dead Weight Hitch - Max Tongue Wt. (lbs)

397

Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Tongue Wt. (lbs)

397

Dead Weight Hitch - Max Trailer Wt. (lbs)

3968

Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Trailer Wt. (lbs)

3968

Maximum Trailering Capacity (lbs)

3968

Get FREE Dealer Quotes

From dealers near you

Go!

Compare 2020 BMW X4 vs 2020 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque

Get FREE Dealer Quotes

Add a Vehicle to Compare