2015 Audi Q5 vs 2015 BMW X4 vs 2015 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque

2015 Audi Q5

2015 BMW X4

2015 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque

Select style

quattro 4-Door 2.0T Premium

Style	MPG City	MPG Hwy	Invoice	MSRP
Q5 quattro 4-Door 2.0T Premium	20	28	$36,550	$39,300
Q5 quattro 4-Door 2.0T Premium Plus	20	28	$36,550	$39,300
Q5 quattro 4-Door 2.0T Prestige Hybrid	24	30	$48,268	$51,900
Q5 quattro 4-Door 3.0L TDI Premium Plus	24	31	$44,177	$47,500
Q5 quattro 4-Door 3.0L TDI Prestige	24	31	$44,177	$47,500
Q5 quattro 4-Door 3.0T Premium Plus	18	26	$42,222	$45,400
Q5 quattro 4-Door 3.0T Prestige	18	26	$42,222	$45,400
SQ5 quattro 4-Door 3.0T Premium Plus	17	24	$49,012	$52,700
SQ5 quattro 4-Door 3.0T Prestige	17	24	$49,012	$52,700

Select style

AWD 4-Door xDrive28i

Style	MPG City	MPG Hwy	Invoice	MSRP
X4 AWD 4-Door xDrive28i	20	28	$41,625	$44,700
X4 AWD 4-Door xDrive35i	19	27	$44,660	$48,000

Select style

2-Door Coupe Dynamic

Style	MPG City	MPG Hwy	Invoice	MSRP
Range Rover Evoque 2-Door Coupe Dynamic	21	30	$52,704	$57,600
Range Rover Evoque 2-Door Coupe Pure Plus	21	30	$41,266	$45,100
Range Rover Evoque 2-Door Coupe Pure Premium	21	30	$41,266	$45,100
Range Rover Evoque 5-Door HB Automaticbiography	21	30	$54,900	$60,000
Range Rover Evoque 5-Door HB Dynamic	21	30	$51,789	$56,600
Range Rover Evoque 5-Door HB Prestige	21	30	$50,965	$55,700
Range Rover Evoque 5-Door HB Pure	21	30	$37,606	$41,100
Range Rover Evoque 5-Door HB Pure Plus	21	30	$37,606	$41,100
Range Rover Evoque 5-Door HB Pure Premium	21	30	$37,606	$41,100

Show Only Differences

Pricing

Invoice Price

$36,550

$41,625

$52,704

Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price

$39,300

$44,700

$57,600

Monthly Payment Estimate

$655 / month

$745 / month

$960 / month

The Car Connection's Take

TCC Rating

8.6

Read Our Full Review

7.8

Read Our Full Review

8.2

Read Our Full Review

TCC’s Bottom Line

The 2015 Audi Q5 remains one of the most elegant, truly car-like crossovers on the market.

The 2015 BMW X4 drops the off-roading, cargo-carrying pretense, and goes for what some BMW owners really want: attention.

The 2015 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque tones down the off-road chops of its older siblings and turns up the design, creating a stylish carlike utility in the process.

TCC Likes

Lots of drivetrain choices, all good
A lesson in good taste
Quick shifts from the eight-speed

Nearly as talented as the X3
iDrive's new touchpad surface
A more suggestive roofline

Brilliant exterior design
Surprising interior space
Punchy turbo engine

TCC Dislikes

Still no standard rearview camera
Gas mileage isn't stellar on gas-only models
We're not sold by Drive Select's adaptive controls

Rear-seat headroom slips
Shape gets bulbous from some angles
Not yet a Macan Turbo rival

Is it a coupe or a crossover?
Is it sporty or an SUV?
The turbo four can still be a bit gravelly

Fuel Economy

City

20 mpg

21 mpg

Highway

28 mpg

30 mpg

Vehicle

EPA Classification

Small Sport Utility Vehicles 4WD

Interior Dimensions

Second Head Room (in)

37.4

38.2

Second Shoulder Room (in)

56.4

53.2

Front Head Room (in)

39.4

39.1

Passenger Volume (ft³)

101.5

Front Shoulder Room (in)

57.7

57.2

56.6

Second Leg Room (in)

37.4

34.8

35.7

Passenger Capacity

Front Leg Room (in)

40.4

40.1

Exterior Dimensions

Liftover Height (in)

27.3

Width, Max w/o mirrors (in)

74.7

74.1

74.8

Track Width, Front (in)

63.7

62.8

63.9

Min Ground Clearance (in)

7.9

8.4

Length, Overall (in)

182.6

184.3

171.9

Height, Overall (in)

65.2

63.9

63.2

Track Width, Rear (in)

63.5

63.4

64.1

Wheelbase (in)

110.5

110.6

104.8

Cargo Area Dimensions

Cargo Volume to Seat 2 (ft³)

29.1

17.7

19.4

Cargo Volume to Seat 1 (ft³)

57.3

49.4

47.6

Cargo Volume to Seat 3 (ft³)

29.1

17.7

19.4

Cargo Area Width @ Beltline (in)

Cargo Box (Area) Height (in)

33.1

Cargo Area Length @ Floor to Seat 2 (in)

31.3

Cargo Box Width @ Wheelhousings (in)

39.2

Cargo Area Length @ Floor to Seat 1 (in)

62.2

Brakes

Rear Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness (in)

11.8

11.9

Brake Type

4-Wheel Disc

Rear Drum Diam x Width (in)

Disc - Front (Yes or )

Yes

Front Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness (in)

12.6

12.9

11.8

Drum - Rear (Yes or )

Brake ABS System

4-Wheel

Disc - Rear (Yes or )

Yes

Fuel Tank

Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx (gal)

19.8

17.7

18.5

Steering

Turning Diameter - Curb to Curb (ft)

38.1

37.1

Steering Type

Rack-Pinion

Tires

Rear Tire Size

P235/60HR18

P245/50WR18

P245/45VR20

Rear Tire Order Code

Front Tire Size

P235/60HR18

P245/50WR18

P245/45VR20

Spare Tire Size

Compact

Front Tire Order Code

Spare Tire Order Code

Trailering

Dead Weight Hitch - Max Tongue Wt. (lbs)

440

350

165

Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Tongue Wt. (lbs)

440

350

165

Dead Weight Hitch - Max Trailer Wt. (lbs)

4400

3500

1653

Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Trailer Wt. (lbs)

4400

3500

1653

Maximum Trailering Capacity (lbs)

4400

3500

1653

Weight Information

Base Curb Weight (lbs)

4079

4130

3615

Wheels

Front Wheel Material

Aluminum

Spare Wheel Material

Steel

Front Wheel Size (in)

18 X 8

20 X 8

Spare Wheel Size (in)

Compact

Rear Wheel Material

Aluminum

Rear Wheel Size (in)

18 X 8

20 X 8

Electrical

Maximum Alternator Capacity (amps)

150

210

Engine

Engine Type

Intercooled Turbo Premium Unleaded I-4

Fuel System

Gasoline Direct Injection

SAE Net Torque @ RPM

258 @ 1500

260 @ 1450

250 @ 1750

Engine Order Code

Displacement

2.0 L/121

2.0 L/122

SAE Net Horsepower @ RPM

220 @ 4450

240 @ 5000

240 @ 5500

Mileage

EPA Fuel Economy Est - City (MPG)

Fuel Economy Est-Combined (MPG)

EPA Fuel Economy Est - Hwy (MPG)

Transmission

Second Gear Ratio (:1)

3.14

2.84

Trans Order Code

2TB

Eighth Gear Ratio (:1)

0.67

0.58

Fourth Gear Ratio (:1)

1.67

1.38

Trans Description Cont.

Automatic w/OD

Sixth Gear Ratio (:1)

1.00

0.80

First Gear Ratio (:1)

4.71

4.70

Seventh Gear Ratio (:1)

0.84

0.70

Final Drive Axle Ratio (:1)

2.85

3.38

3.75

Third Gear Ratio (:1)

2.11

1.90

Trans Type

Drivetrain

All Wheel

All Wheel Drive

Four Wheel Drive

Fifth Gear Ratio (:1)

1.28

1.29

1.00

Trans Description Cont. Again

Reverse Ratio (:1)

3.32

3.29

3.80

Summary

Body Style

quattro Sport Utility

Sports Activity Coupe

Coupe

Vehicle Name

Audi Q5

BMW X4

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque

Suspension

Suspension Type - Rear (Cont.)

Multi-Link

Strut

Suspension Type - Front

Multi-Link

Strut

Suspension Type - Front (Cont.)

Multi-Link

Strut

Suspension Type - Rear

Multi-Link

Strut

Emissions

Tons/yr of CO2 Emissions @ 15K mi/year

7.7 (Est)

7.3 (Est)

Crash Test Ratings

Overall Rating

Overall Frontal Barrier Crash Rating

Frontal Barrier Crash Rating Driver

Frontal Barrier Crash Rating Passenger

Overall Side Crash Rating

Side Barrier Rating

Side Barrier Rating Driver

Side Barrier Rating Passenger Rear Seat

Side Pole Rating Driver Front Seat

Combined Side Rating Front Seat

Combined Side Rating Rear Seat

Rollover Rating

Get FREE Dealer Quotes

From dealers near you

Go!

Compare 2015 Audi Q5 vs 2015 BMW X4 vs 2015 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque

Get FREE Dealer Quotes