• fb_82100996 avatar Richard Posted: 6/11/2012 6:54am PDT

    WAY too expensive. With options, it’ll be over $45k easily. That’s Audi territory.

  • wrenchead avatar wrenchead Posted: 6/11/2012 8:31am PDT

    But 80 less HP and more importantly 150 less ft/lbs of torque with better fuel mileage.

  • ImaDingBat avatar ImaDingBat Posted: 9/15/2012 5:43am PDT

    It seems rather strange that among the hundreds of photos of the new 2013 Explorer Sport, there is NOT ONE PHOTO of the engine compartment? Not a single view of the most significant and distinguishing feature of this new model, namely, the twin-turbo V6 engine. Did anyone actually see the EcoBoost V6 engine in the few mockups that were introduced in March of 2013? One would think that if the mockups actually had that distinguishing V6 engine installed in the 2013 Explorer Sport, that we would have seen some views of it sitting in the engine compartment. The total lack of photos of that engine installed in the 2013 Explorer Sport is VERY curious.