By
LATEST ARTICLE
Electric Vehicle Maker Tesla Unveiling Model X SUV, Live Tonight
Tesla [NSDQ: TSLA] has already broken the ice for electric cars in the U.S.—and in the world... Read More
Electric Vehicle Maker Tesla Unveiling Model X SUV, Live Tonight
Tesla [NSDQ: TSLA] has already broken the ice for electric cars in the U.S.—and in the world... Read More
- #11LEADERBOARD RANK
- 2227ARTICLES CONTRIBUTED
- 92COMMENTS POSTED
24,217 views
Combining firsthand experience with the Nissan Rogue with highlights of what other top review sources have remarked, TheCarConnection.com has assembled this review on the 2010 Rogue, so as to help you make the most informed purchase.
Likes:
- Impressive interior
- Smooth ride
- Decent maneuverability
- Useful cargo area organizer
- One of the better-looking crossover wagons
Dislikes:
- Obscured rearward visibility
- Back seat is tight for three across
- CVT transmission
- Not at all exciting to drive
The Rogue is Nissan’s first compact crossover vehicle—essentially the cross between a tall station wagon and an SUV. Shortly after its introduction the four-cylinder Rogue became more relevant to price- and fuel economy-conscious shoppers who were looking to save money without giving up cabin space.
A rakish design, with gently arced roofline and a more aggressive tuck downward in back give the Rogue more of a ‘lifted’ station wagon appearance than is the case for most crossovers. With proportions that make it appear wider and longer than it actually is from the outside, few would guess that the Rogue is actually based on the compact Sentra sedan. Cues from the larger Murano give it a hint of upscale, but with smaller wheels and more benign-looking fender flares, it’s clearly not as premium-looking. The same goes inside, where the five-passenger Rogue gets a chunky interior design that borrows a bit from all of Nissan’s cars and crossovers.
You don’t have any powertrain choices with theh 2010 Nissan Rogue, except for the choice of front-wheel drive or all-wheel drive. All versions come with a 170-horsepower, 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine and continuously variable automatic transmission (CVT). The combination isn’t much fun, but it can move the Rogue quickly if you press it. As the Rogue is a bit heavier than most of Nissan’s other four-cylinder vehicles, the transmission isn’t particularly responsive, with the engine becoming boomy under acceleration. Handling is more on the soft side—those expecting a sportier experience will be disappointed—but maneuverability is good for parking or tight city streets. Some Rogue models get paddles that provide you with simulated gears to help improve control on especially hilly or curvy roads. And with ratings of 22 mpg city, 27 highway for the front-wheel-drive version, it’s quite fuel-efficient. Mileage ratings are 1 mpg lower with AWD, and the system is configured for traction in deep snow or mud, not off-road ability.
