Research

2004 Toyota Corolla Review

The Car Connection Expert Rating Breakdown?

The Car Connection Expert Review

GET CURRENT PRICING

GET AN INSURANCE QUOTE

 

To drifters (the kind that slide cars around tracks, not the ones who come into town on freight trains) there’s no more revered icon than the “AE86,” which was known over here as the 1985 to 1987 Toyota Corolla GT-S. With rear-drive, a solid rear axle, minimal curb weight, and a multi-valve 1.6-liter four in its nose, it’s a car that wants to be driven sideways. But the history of the Corolla since then has been one of steadily diminishing performance aspirations and steadily increasing utilitarianism. With the new Corolla XRS, Toyota finally tries to retrieve some street cred and it’s the most satisfying Corolla sold in America since the AE86.

To quote ourselves when this generation Corolla was introduced, “if Toyota really wants to attract more young buyers to the brand, they need to bring back more than just a single four-door body style in three modest trim levels to the market. How about an S sedan with the 180-horsepower engine and six-speed manual transmission they’re offering in the Matrix XRS and Celica GT-S to start?” Well, that’s pretty much exactly what the XRS is.

Corolla Outside, Celica Inside

The current Corolla is basically a mini-Camry. In fact it’s not even all that mini as, at 178.3-inches long, it’s exactly the same length as original 1983 Camry. Available only as a four-door sedan, it’s solid (like a Camry), staid (like a Camry), it’s front-drive (like a Camry), extremely well built (like a Camry) and pretty boring (like, yup, a Camry). And it looks like a Camry too.

The Corolla sells well in base CE, slightly luxurious LE and slightly sporty S trim and all three perform about identically since they’re all powered by the same 1.8-liter, all-aluminum, DOHC, 16-valve four equipped with Toyota’s VVT-I variable valve timing system. Making 130-horsepower, it’s not a bad powerplant and generally comparable to those in the mainstream Honda Civic and Nissan Sentra models. Whether backed by a five-speed manual or four-speed automatic, the engine is a fine companion, but never an exciting one.

The Car Connection Consumer Review

Rate and Review your car for The Car Connection! Tell us your own ratings for a vehicle you own. Rate your car on Performance, Safety, Features and more.
Write a Review
Sunday, May 22, 2016
2016 Toyota Corolla 4-Door Sedan CVT S Plus (Natl)

sharp looks but lacks power

  • Overall Rating
  • Interior/Exterior
  • Performance
  • Comfort and Quality
  • Safety
  • Features
  • Fuel Economy / MPG
  • Reliability
just purchased a 2016 corolla S plus and traded in a kia forte ex 2.0. the Toyota is better on gas but really lacks in engine performance. exterior looks great interior lacks modern fetchers that come standard... + More »
people found this helpful.
Was this review helpful? Yes
Wednesday, October 28, 2015
For 2016 Toyota Corolla

Performs Better than expected.

  • Overall Rating
  • Interior/Exterior
  • Performance
  • Comfort and Quality
  • Safety
  • Features
  • Fuel Economy / MPG
  • Reliability
Picked up my 2nd corolla ever...my first one being my 1993 Corolla DX 5 speed manual right after college. The 2016 LE version looks very sporty and has very good get up and go. I've always loved toyotas for... + More »
people found this helpful.
Was this review helpful? Yes
Sunday, June 14, 2015
1996 Toyota Corolla 4-Door Sedan DX Manual

stable and reliable car.

  • Overall Rating
  • Interior/Exterior
  • Performance
  • Comfort and Quality
  • Safety
  • Features
  • Fuel Economy / MPG
  • Reliability
This is my everyday car and my family car, very stable and reliable.
people found this helpful.
Was this review helpful? Yes
See all user reviews »