
subscribe
Sports car or sport-ute?
Spend a few hours behind the wheel of Mazda’s new CX-7 and you might start to
wonder. And with good reason, for while the Japanese maker’s Miata and
RX-8 are the classic examples of “zoom-zoom” engineering, the CX-7 is likely to
make you forget you’re driving a crossover.
If you include the Tribute, Mazda has already been
playing in the fast-growing crossover segment, a category that is expected to
outsell conventional sport-utility vehicles this year. But the Tribute, a
thinly-disguised version of the Ford Escape, never really did much for the Asian
marque, never really fit into the sporty niche Mazda has been carving out for
itself any more than the boxy MPV minivan. The CX-7 — along with the CX-9, the
big brother due out early next year — make up another breed
entirely.
As chief designer Moray Callum is quick to admit,
there are limits to what you can do with the shape of a sport-utility vehicle or
crossover — at least if you intend to provide any usable headroom for the folks
in the back seats. Nonetheless, you know, at first glance, there’s something
different about the CX-7.
Sure, at 69 inches, the crossover stands a lot
taller than a Miata or RX-8, but the flowing shape captures the sporty theme
that now runs through the expanding Mazda lineup. There are the bold, honeycomb
grille, the steeply raked windshield, and muscular wheel arches. The tail tapers
gently, just enough to gel the visual theme, but without cramping cargo and
passenger space or crimping rear visibility. Use the easy-to-reach latches and
you get a full 70 inches of flat floor space with the rear seats
down.
Callum’s designers pulled off a neat trick working
with program manager Shunsuke Kawasaki, who
envisioned a vehicle he dubbed the “metropolitan hawk.” What’s come to market
strays surprisingly little from the original design sketches that guided the
project.
One of
Kawasaki
’s key goals was to make the CX-7 look
a lot more lavish than the $23,750 base price might suggest. Outside and in,
Mazda worked up some elegant touches, including the refined piano black accent
pieces (which first appeared on the much more expensive RX-8). That said, the
automaker did cut a few corners, here and there, with some chintzier plastic
pieces, but they tend to show up in out-of-the-way corners.

JD Power button
GET J.D. Power
Circle ratings for new cars and trucks
Mazda worked up three versions of the new
crossover, starting with the Sport, a mid-range Tourer, and the heavily loaded
Grand Tourer. Even the base CX-7 is reasonably well-equipped. “No stripper
here,” boasted Mazda VP Jay Amestoy. Add all the options onto the top-line
model, such as navigation, and you’ll nudge $32,000.
That’s an attractive price range, all the more so
once you get a chance to drive the CX-7.
We spent a day wandering through the rolling hills and winding back roads
of
Virginia, as well as the cramped and crowded
streets of
Washington,
D.C. The crossover handled both
challenges with equal aplomb.
Sweeping through the countryside, we couldn’t help
but admire the 7’s well-planted manners. Okay, it’s not a Miata, but it felt
good, zipping around tight corners with only the barest hint of body roll. The
crossover’s hydraulic power steering system subtly increases effort as road
speed increases, providing very good road feel.
The real test came as we misread a sharp corner,
entering quite a bit faster than we’d have liked. The four-wheel discs,
anti-lock and stability control all came together seamlessly, through Mazda’s
Vehicle Dynamic Control system, scrubbing off speed in a hurry before easing us
through the turn.
On city streets, the CX-7 offered near wraparound
visibility a reasonably tight turning radius and those brakes proved perfect for
the stop-and-go of early rush hour.
Going into the inevitable background briefing, we
had to wonder why Mazda decided to stick with a relatively small-displacement
four-cylinder engine. With a curb weight of 3929 pounds, one might reasonably
expect a V-6, at least as the up-model option. Mazda officials might as well have told
us, “Just wait.”
On the road, the automaker’s intercooled,
turbocharged, 2.3-liter DISI engine more than justified itself. The acronym
stands for Direct Injection, Spark Ignition. Gearheads will recognize that
equation, though the DI side is more commonly found in modern diesel engines —
which also use compression, rather than spark, to ignite their air/fuel mixture.
The DISI system blasts that mixture deep into the combustion chamber and,
according to Mazda engineer, this results in a nearly ten-percent increase in
torque and horsepower.
That powertrain is the same one offered on the
sporty MazdaSpeed6, incidentally, though for the sedan, it is tuned to deliver
another 30 horses. But there’s no sense that Mazda has sold the CX-7 short. At
244 hp and 258 lb-ft of torque, the numbers look good on paper, and feel even
better on the road.
There was another advantage to going with a turbo
four, program chief
Kawasaki added. The smaller engine, with its
top-mounted turbo, lowered the overall weight of the new crossover, while also
improving weight balance. At 18 mpg city and 24 highway, mileage is reasonably
good, at a time when fuel economy has again become a point of concern for
American buyers.
While the turbo four is incredibly competent and
far more than adequate, we’d still like to get a little more power. Could a
MazdaSpeed version of the CX-7 be in the works? It would be
welcome.
Along with the three trim levels, the CX-7 is
offered with either a front-wheel-drive or all-wheel-drive powertrain
configuration. The $1729 AWD system is normally biased forward, with 100 percent
of torque aimed at the front wheels. But when needed, up to 50 percent can be
shifted to the rear tires. Mazda makes no claims about the CX-7’s
off-roadability. Then again, even the most serious SUVs seldom see anything
rougher than a gravel road, so we don’t see this as a
flaw.
There’s been some debate about the
familial lineage of the CX-7. Mazda aficionados may recognize the basic shape of the
new vehicle, which was broadly hinted at in the form of the MX-Crossport concept
vehicle. But as with many other Mazda products, the Japanese maker worked closely
on the development of the crossover with its partner, Ford Motor Co.
Some reports have suggested CX-7 is little more
than a rebadged version of the
U.S.
maker’s own new crossover, the
Edge. Such claims draw righteous indignation from
Kawasaki
and his team. True, there are some
technical similarities in the underlying architecture of the two vehicles, “But
they are not identical, by any means,” Amestoy took pains to point out.
Nor, he added, is the upcoming CX-9 just a 16-inch
stretch of the CX-7. For the three-row crossover, Mazda has developed yet
another new platform, though in the mix-and-match world of today’s vehicle
designs, there are, of course, a number of shared
components.
Defining the term, “crossover” is like trying to
put a frame around smoke. There are car/truck crossovers, truck/truck
crossovers, even car/car crossovers. But we’ve experienced few vehicles that put
the concept to such good use. The CX-7 is stylish, sporty and functional. As
much as any vehicle in the Mazda lineup, it delivers that promised “zoom-zoom.”
Mazda’s new offering will face some tough
competition out there, including the likes of the Toyota RAV4 and Honda CR-V.
The CX-7 is likely to give the big guys a serious run for the
money.
2007
Mazda CX-7
Base price:
$24,310
Engine: Turbocharged 2.3-liter in-line four, 244 hp/258
lb-ft
Transmission: Six-speed automatic with manual mode, front- or
all-wheel drive
Length x width x
height: 184.0 x 73.7 x 64.8 in
Wheelbase: 108.3 in
Curb weight: 3929 lb
Fuel economy (EPA city/hwy): 18/24 mpg
(est.)
Major standard features:
Power windows, locks and mirrors; AM/FM/CD; keyless remote; cruise control;
power driver seat; folding rear seat
Standard
safety features: Dual front, side
and curtain airbags; anti-lock brakes, traction and stability
control
Warranty: Four years/50,000 miles