2007 Isuzu i-series
Isuzu's i-series line of pickup trucks is based on the Chevrolet Colorado/GMC Canyon compact... Read More
- N/ALEADERBOARD RANK
- 484ARTICLES CONTRIBUTED
- 0COMMENTS POSTED
Related Articles:
Honda by Jim Gorzelany (9/17/2004)
If you were looking for a
compact, car-based SUV back in 1997, things were a lot simpler than they are
today. There were only a handful on the market to choose from in those days,
with the major players being Toyota’s just-launched RAV4, the Subaru Forester,
and the Honda
CR-V.
These little runabouts offered buyers a way to get many of
the desirable “real world” attributes of a compact SUV, including higher ride
height, versatility, and the availability of a sure-footed all-wheel-drive
system, without the gas-pig appetite for fuel and clunky handling of a
traditional, truck-based sport-ute. It was a great idea, and others quickly
caught on.
Since ’97, the market for these
user-friendly “crossover” SUVs has grown like well-tended kudzu in a Georgia
hothouse. Today, there are more than a dozen of these things available to choose
from. Some, like recent entries from Kia and Hyundai, are a lot less expensive
(or better-equipped for the dollar) than the CR-V, which starts at $20,195
for the entry-level LX with front-wheel drive and runs to $25,250 for a Special
Edition with heated leather seats and all-wheel drive. Others, like the hugely
popular Ford Escape, offer more interior room, as well as brawny V-6 engines and
decent pulling ability, which the four-cylinder-only, light-duty CR-V simply
can’t match. But the CR-V remains true to the basic concept that started it all:
a fuel-efficient, agile, and easy-to-drive cross between a traditional small
sedan and a compact (but gas-thirsty and clumsy handling) SUV.
Civic pride
The CR-V’s Accord-sourced
2.4-liter engine may “only” offer up 160 hp, but it’s enough to run the CR-V to
60-mph in about 8.5 seconds. And it can tickle 30 mpg on the highway. Many
buyers don’t realize that a modern four-cylinder engine such as the CR-V’s has
power comparable to what a much larger six-cylinder engine put out in years
past. If you haven’t driven a new vehicle lately, don’t dismiss the CR-V because
it “only” has a four-cylinder engine. This one’s more than adequate for normal
driving and decently responsive, as well as
fuel-efficient.
