Find a Car

Ford Mustang Vs. Chevrolet Camaro: Compare Cars

2016 Ford Mustang Shelby GT350
/ 10
TCC Rating
2016 Ford Mustang
People's Vote votes Read full review »
2016 Chevrolet Camaro convertible
/ 10
TCC Rating
2016 Chevrolet Camaro
People's Vote votes Read full review »
By Kirk Bell
March 5, 2016

The Ford Mustang and Chevrolet Camaro have been going head-to-head since 1967, and the the competition has only gotten hotter with recent redesigns for both cars.

The good news is the latest versions of these pony cars are the best yet. When the Mustang was redesigned as a 2015 model--boasting a new sophisticated independent rear suspension, powerful and efficient drivetrains, and a comprehensive set of safety and technology features--we figured Chevrolet had a lot of work to do to. Then the 2016 Camaro arrived with the premium platform from the Cadillac ATS, at least 200 fewer pounds, and a full equipment set of its own.

It's time to stop calling both of these cars pony cars. They are now full-blown sports cars. But how do they compare to each other? Let's take a look.

We rate the styling of both cars equally, and both are a modern take on a retro design with a low and wide stance and muscular haunches. The Camaro, however, has a gunslit greenhouse that imparts a menacing, chopped-top look. The Mustang, by comparison, features a graceful canopy that offers more outward vision.

We do rate the Mustang higher for Comfort and Quality, mostly because it is easier to see out of and it has a bit more space. 

Yes, the Mustang is still a 2+2 at heart with tight headroom and legroom; but front-seat room is generous and the available Recaro seats are great. While a driver can now wear a helmet in the Camaro, front seat space is still tight, the rear seat won't hold much more than a backpack, and the trunk is shallow and narrow.

The materials quality of both interiors is higher than in the past, but these cockpits still have more hard plastics than we'd prefer.

But people don't buy these cars for accommodations. They buy them for their performance, and both deliver in spades. Much of the credit for the Camaro's excellent handling goes to its downsized, light-weighted footprint. The Alpha platform elevates its handling to a new level, and the ride and handling can be further enhanced with GM's excellent Magnetic Ride Control adaptive dampers.

This is the first generation of Mustang with an independent rear suspension and it contributes to wonderfully composed road manners car and huge track potential. On the road, the Mustang is nimble and forgiving, and flat through corners.

We find two points in the Camaro's favor, however, The razor sharp steering is quite satisfying, and the rear end is better planted.

Engine performance is a wash. We haven't driven the Camaro's new turbocharged four-cylinder or the Mustang's V-6, but the Camaro's 335-horsepower V-6 can launch the car from 0 to 60 mph in about five seconds, which was V-8 territory just a few years ago. The Mustang's turbo four, on the other hand, can crack off 0-60 mph times of less than six seconds, but its power delivery and sound don't have the typical muscle car feel.

It's V-8 performance that matters most in these cars. The Camaro SS, rated at 455 hp and 455 pound-feet of torque, is sensational, with 60-mph times of four seconds just within reach. Ford's 5.0-liter V-8 checks in at 435 horsepower and 400 lb-ft of torque. It revs wonderfully, and 0 to 60 mph times are pegged at about 4.5 seconds. For those who want more, the GT350's flat-plane crank, 526-horsepower 5.2-liter V-8 sounds like the lovechild of a Ferrari and a NASCAR stocker as it vaults the car from 0 to 60 mph in about four seconds.

All that power can be had with decent fuel economy. The Camaro's V-8 checks in at 20 mpg in combined city/highway driving, while the Mustang's 5.0 gets 19 mpg combined. The Camaro V-6 is rated at 23 mpg combined compared the Mustang's 22, and Ford's four reaches 26 mpg in the combined cycle while the Camaro returns 25 combined mpg.

While no crash-test data is available for the Camaro yet, we rate the cars equally for Safety. Past versions of the Camaro have performed well in crash tests, and the 2016 model has more safety technology, like forward-collision warnings, blind-spot monitors, and a standard rearview camera. The Mustang has earned excellent crash test ratings, and it offers the same safety features.

We view both cars as values, though we give the Camaro the nod for Features. It's a bit more expensive model for model, but we like such features as the Apple CarPlay and Android Auto compatibility, 4G LTE data services, and especially the available magnetic dampers. We must also recognize that the Camaro SS delivers performance on par with the Mustang GT350 for up to $12,000 less. Ford makes many of its performance features available in option packages, and we appreciate the available launch control and line lock.

In the final analysis, we rate the Mustang and Camaro equally, and can't really pick a winner. We prefer the steering and composure of the Camaro, and the outward sightlines and more usable space of the Mustang. Whichever is more important to you will determine the car you choose.

from $24,145 from $25,700
from $23,299 from $24,672
Fuel Economy - Combined City and Highway
21 - TBD -
Front Leg Room (in)
44.5 43.90
Second Leg Room (in)
30.6 - TBD -
Read Full Specs Read Full Specs
Search Dealers by ZIP Code
Update ZIP Code
from $24,145
from $25,700
from $23,299
from $24,672
Compare Free Dealer Price Quote
With competitive price quotes from multiple dealers, you will be prepared when you meet your local car dealer. Please tell us how to contact you so that dealers can compete for your business!
Looking for dealers in your area...
We are committed to your privacy. By submitting this form you agree the phone number you provided may be used to contact you (including autodialed or pre-recorded calls). Consent is not a condition of purchase.
Follow Us

© 2016 The Car Connection. All Rights Reserved. The Car Connection is published by Internet Brands Automotive Group. Stock photography by izmo, Inc. Read Our Cookie Policy.