The Lowest-Rated Cars Of 2015

April 23, 2015

The Car Connection reviews more than 250 new vehicles each year, and we rate and rank each of them to arrive at a total score. After all that driving, we know well which cars are the best cars to buy -- the ones with the best styling, performance, comfort and utility, safety, features, and fuel economy.

What about the worst cars? Some cars do extremely well in our evaluation process. Inevitably, there are the cars (including trucks, SUVs and minivans) that fare poorly in our ratings.

ALSO SEE: Young Men Don’t Get The Most Speeding Tickets: Who Does Will Surprise You

A low score doesn't always mean a vehicle should be avoided at all costs. Some simply aren't up to the class standard; some are designed with good intentions, but lack in execution. Others do very well in some ways, but have an obvious Achilles heel.

Often, a low score means a vehicle just doesn't meet the stringent new crash-test standards set in just the past few years.

You've met the winners--now it's time for the also-rans. When we tally the results of all our driving, reviewing, and scoring, these emerge as the lowest-rated vehicles for the 2015 model year:

2015 Toyota Tacoma

With a overall TCC Rating of 62, the Tacoma has low scores across the board. The cabin is packaged poorly, even for a pickup truck. The Tacoma's fuel economy is nothing special, and on-road ride and handling are a low in the mid-size truck segment. GM's new mid-sizers, the Canyon and Colorado, are much better choices in virtually every dimension.

2014 Mitsubishi Mirage ES - Driven, April 2014

2014 Mitsubishi Mirage ES - Driven, April 2014

Enlarge Photo

2015 Mitsubishi Mirage

The Mirage ties the Tacoma with our lowest numeric rating, but does it primarily through its performance score. There's just not much of it: you won't find any joy rowing the Mirage's gearbox or throttling its four-cylinder for all it's worth. Lower scores in styling and interior comfort are offset somewhat by reasonable safety ratings and a strong fuel-economy score.

2015 Scion iQ

2015 Scion iQ

Enlarge Photo

2015 Scion iQ

The two-plus-seater iQ scores higher than two vehicles in our rankings, mostly because it's styled with some attention to detail and has fair crash-test scores, especially for its size. What it doesn't have is acceleration or grip in any sizable measure. It's also not as efficient as cars a size class larger. Its chief selling point is easy parking--a selling point that's critical to very few buyers. For about the same money, Scion's own xD is a much better vehicle--which could explain why the iQ is being discontinued.

2015 Nissan Versa Sedan SL

2015 Nissan Versa Sedan SL

Enlarge Photo

2015 Nissan Versa

Our rather dim assessment of the Versa applies more to the sedan than to the Versa Note hatchback, a better-looking and better-handling vehicle tagged with the same nameplate. The sedan sports excellent interior space, but ungainly styling, awkward handling, and unfortunately low crash-test scores.

2015 Mazda 5

2015 Mazda 5

Enlarge Photo

2015 Mazda 5

A Mazda minivan? It's full of the contradictions you might expect--good handling, decent styling, smaller-than-average interior space (though still quite usable). What it doesn't have: good safety ratings. A minivan simply has to have excellent scores across the board to make it a sensible family choice, and the Mazda 5's poor small-overlap crash test scores put it near the bottom of the family-hauler rankings.

Tags:
2017
The Car Connection
See the winners »
2017
The Car Connection
 
Ratings and Reviews
Rate and review your car for The Car Connection
Review your car
The Car Connection Daily Headlines
I agree to receive emails from the site. I can withdraw my consent at any time by unsubscribing.
Thank you! Please check your email for confirmation.