Find a Car
Go!

Dodge Challenger Vs. Ford Mustang: Compare Cars

2015 Dodge Challenger ‘Shaker’
8.4
/ 10
TCC Rating
2016 Dodge Challenger
People's Vote votes Read full review »
2016 Ford Mustang Shelby GT350
8.4
/ 10
TCC Rating
2016 Ford Mustang
People's Vote votes Read full review »
By Nelson Ireson
Senior Editor
December 14, 2015

Muscle-car fans aren't like other car shoppers. They know what they want, and they're highly unlikely to switch allegiances from Chevy to Dodge to Ford. 

But maybe you're new to the world of smoky burnouts? Before you buy, it’s worth comparing two of the longest-lived muscle cars on the market: the Ford Mustang and the Dodge Challenger.

Both cars trace their histories to the 1960s, but both have evolved into completely modern machines. The Ford Mustang was new for 2015, with a fresh look and improved equipment. The 2015 model year brought the Dodge Challenger its biggest updates since its current-generation launch seven years ago. Both are essentially unchanged for 2016, though a new arrival tips the scales more heavily in one direction.

Under the hood is always a good place to start with a muscle car. The Ford Mustang GT packs the expected V-8, a 5.0-liter Coyote engine rated at 435 horsepower and 400 pound-feet of torque. A V-6 engine is also available, offering 300 hp and 280 lb-ft from its 3.7 liters. But one new offering is intriguing: a 2.3-liter turbocharged four-cylinder good for 310 hp and 320 lb-ft. And another is simply mind-blowing: a new Shelby GT350 model hustles out 526 horsepower from a flat-plane-crank V-8, and in R trim, is one of the most sensational track cars we've driven this year.

The Dodge Challenger has its own impressive selection—but it takes things in the other direction from Ford’s four-cylinder. Instead, the top model of the Challenger packs a 707-hp 6.2-liter supercharged V-8, and wears the title “Hellcat.” Below that sits the 6.4-liter HEMI found in the R/T Scat Pack and 392 HEMI Scat Pack Shaker models. Rated for 485 hp and 475 lb-ft, it’s a serious mill for a serious muscle car. Yet another V-8 is also available in the R/T range: the 5.7-liter HEMI, rated at 400 hp and 375 lb-ft. Finally, a 3.6-liter Pentastar V-6 engine is also available, promising 305 hp and 268 lb-ft.

Both Mustang and Challenger offer a choice of automatic or manual transmissions on most models.

So which of these muscle cars has the best muscle? That’s a loaded question, as the powertrains only tell half the story. Still, for those seeking the raw brawn of the muscle car golden age, the Challenger has a leg up on the Mustang.

The other half of the muscle car performance story is told in the handling. Here, the Mustang’s newer origins and overall lighter-weight mission  have their advantages. Add to that the Mustang’s adoption of independent suspension on the rear axle as well as the front, and you have the best-handling Mustang yet—even before you consider the GT350 and its magnetic adaptive dampers. The Challenger, on the other hand, is a large, heavy muscle car, even in Hellcat and R/T Scat Pack spec. That means you won’t be carving up canyon roads with the imported sports car clubs come the weekend—though the Mustang well might.

Of course, we have to live with our toys as well as play with them, and here the Mustang and the Challenger stand on rather equal footing.

An new interior for the Challenger gives it a fresh new look and feel, with some nice tech coming along for the ride. A 7-inch TFT instrument cluster screen and a 5-inch screen handles infotainment duty, with an 8.4-inch screen available. The Connect infotainment system is among the best in the business for both looks and ease of use, with SD, USB, auxiliary input, navigation, and more.

The Mustang is still new, but its cockpit is very familiar—just updated. With a similar retro-modern look to the previous Mustang, with old-school-style gauges nestled in modern plastics, Ford’s SYNC with MyFord Touch infotainment system with available Track Apps (performance-measuring abilities) centered in the dash. While feature-filled, SYNC does feature a bit of a learning curve, and has earned a reputation for some quirky behavior. It's being replaced by a clearer, cleaner SYNC 3 system for the 2016 model year.

Beyond that, it’s mostly a matter of personal preference—both cars offer plenty of room in the front seat, but the Challenger’s rear seats are usable by adults—provided you can get behind the front row to get into them—while the Mustang’s are best reserved for smaller kids and cargo. Both earn very good crash-test scores, though the Mustang may pull away here as soon as the IIHS weighs in with more tests; it scores better than the Challenger in the NHTSA's tests.

Otherwise, it’s a beauty contest—which old-school-meets-new-school look turns you on the most? For our dollar, both the Challenger and the Mustang offer plenty to love: brawny performance, entertaining high tech, comfortable cruising. We're huge fans of the Mustang's track-ready versions and its much improved handling, but like the Challenger's retro silhouette and its ground-shaking HEMI. You can't really go wrong with either one.

Summary
Styling
Performance
Quality
Safety
Features
Green
MSRP
from $26,995 from $24,145
Invoice
from $26,666 from $23,299
Fuel Economy - Combined City and Highway
23 21
Front Leg Room (in)
42 44.5
Second Leg Room (in)
33.1 30.6
Read Full Specs Read Full Specs
Search Dealers by ZIP Code
Update ZIP Code
MSRP
 
from $26,995
from $24,145
INVOICE
 
from $26,666
from $23,299
Compare Free Dealer Price Quote
With competitive price quotes from multiple dealers, you will be prepared when you meet your local car dealer. Please tell us how to contact you so that dealers can compete for your business!
Looking for dealers in your area...
We are committed to your privacy. By submitting this form you agree the phone number you provided may be used to contact you (including autodialed or pre-recorded calls). Consent is not a condition of purchase.
 
Follow Us


 
© 2016 The Car Connection. All Rights Reserved. The Car Connection is published by Internet Brands Automotive Group. Stock photography by izmo, Inc. Read Our Cookie Policy.