If you've been living under a rock the past couple of weeks, here are a couple of things you should know:
- Llamas went on the lam in Arizona and have since been apprehended.
- If anyone asks, the dress is blue.
- Apple is almost certainly building an autonomous, electric car.
Reactions have been pretty divided on that third item -- not as divided as they are about that damn dress, but still, emotions have been running high.
On the one hand, you have the auto industry old guard, whose responses to the Apple rumors -- which, to this day, remain just rumors -- have typically fallen somewhere between "You've got to be kidding me" and "I'd like to see 'em try". Next, we expect them to shake their fist and shout, "Git offa my lawn!"
On the other, you have the Apple fanatics who have said things like: "This won’t be a car with an Apple logo or something that Tesla is doing. Instead, it will be something at least ten times better (you pick the metric) than anyone else is doing." And they've said such things with totally straight faces, conveniently forgetting about products like Apple Maps, which were (a) exactly what other companies were doing, and (b) if anything, ten times worse.
Other fanboys (and fangirls) have tried to be more even-keeled, arguing that tech companies simply have an edge when it comes to autonomous car technology because they've got long, perfect track records:
"Car companies will need to rethink how they manage their supply chains if they want to avoid producing cars with huge security flaws. In contrast, companies like Apple and Google have long experience developing secure and reliable software and are less likely to make the same mistakes."
Riiiiiight. Statements like that not only overlook the fact that automakers have been programming onboard computers for decades, but also the incessant updates required to keep our phones, laptops, and tablets running smoothly.
There are plenty of good reasons for all these hyperbolic statements about the auto industry's future, particularly from young people who want to see change. Chief among those is that our ideas about what a car "is" and what it's capable of doing have shifted over the past several years. (It's a little like the 1960s, when optimism over the U.S. space program created unrealistic expectations of flying cars and robot butlers and Pan Am flights into near-Earth orbit.) Consider the following:
- Technology is mainstream, not kept in the hands of the few. Anyone with a computer and 15 minutes to kill can write an app or build a blog. So really, how hard can it be to program an autonomous car? (As it turns out, the answer is "very hard", but that doesn't keep us from believing that self-drivers ought to be available tomorrow.)
- We're used to in-car technology. We expect modern cars to have cameras and warning systems and GPS and infotainment. In fact, to many drivers, a car's technological offerings are far more important than what's under the hood.
- We feel more affection for tech companies than car companies. Most of us spend far more time staring into our smartphones and tablets than driving around town, so it's not really surprising that we feel a brand-affinity for Apple and Google that we no longer feel with automakers. We see no reason why our beloved gadget-makers couldn't also do a bang-up job designing cars.
- Cities are increasingly crowded, making cars increasingly a nuisance. If we're going to own a car, we want more from it. We want it to make life easier and more entertaining, like our smartphones and tablets.
- Car dealers are generally despised. Or at least, they're not trusted. The idea of a brand like Apple -- a brand for which many people have an abiding love -- entering the automotive space is deeply attractive to some.