Advertisement
Find a Car
Go!

You Are Being Watched: ACLU Shows Extent Of License Plate Tracking: Slideshow

Follow Richard

Camera lens

Camera lens

Enlarge Photo

Last fall, we told you about the widespread use of license plate readers -- cameras deployed by government agencies to scan and track plates as cars move across town and across the country.

License plate readers can be put to great use finding stolen vehicles or hunting down kidnappers. The problem is, there aren't any officially established "best practices" when it comes to collecting, maintaining, and deleting all the data that readers collect. And generally speaking, the law is on the side of the government, not consumers.

But really, how pervasive are these cameras? How bad can it be?

The American Civil Liberties Union did some snooping, and in today's spirit of whistleblowing or wikileaking or domestic terrorism (take your pick), the organization has released the results of nearly 600 freedom-of-information requests filed in 38 states and the District of Columbia. The ACLU wanted to know how government agencies at the federal, state, and local levels use and dispose of the data they acquire through license plate readers.

Put on your tinfoil hats, people, because the news isn't encouraging. Among the findings revealed in the final 26,000-page document:

  • There are no nationwide standards setting limits on who can use license plate scanners.
  • There are no nationwide standards setting limits on how scanned data can be used.
  • There are no nationwide standards setting limits on how long data can be held before being deleted.

As a result, there are now huge repositories of license plate data stored on government computers. (Anyone want to guess how secure those computers are?) In Jersey City, New Jersey, 2.1 million plates were recorded in 2012, and there are roughly 10 million in city databases. However, that data is deleted every five years.

On the other hand, there's Grapevine, Texas (population 47,385), which has over 2,000,000 tracking records and no policy on when data should be deleted.

After reviewing the nationwide disarray of information collection and storage, the ACLU has suggested five rules to standardize license plate data collection:

1. License plate readers may be used by law enforcement agencies only to investigate hits and in other circumstances in which law enforcement agents reasonably believe that the plate data are relevant to an ongoing criminal investigation.

2. The government must not store data about innocent people for any lengthy period. Unless plate data has been flagged, retention periods should be measured in days or weeks, not months and certainly not years.

3. People should be able to find out if plate data of vehicles registered to them are contained in a law enforcement agency’s database.

4. Law enforcement agencies should not share license plate reader data with third parties that do not follow proper retention and access principles. They should also be transparent regarding with whom they share license plate reader data.

5. Any entity that uses license plate readers should be required to report its usage publicly on at least an annual basis.

For more about the ACLU's findings, check out the disturbing/informative slideshow below. (Warning: it takes a second to load. Be patient.) 

___________________________________________

Follow The Car Connection on FacebookTwitter and Google+.

Posted in:
Advertisement
 
Follow Us

 

Have an opinion?

  • Posting indicates you have read this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
  • Notify me when there are more comments
Comments (3)
  1. Police already do random plate checks manually in traffic now, why does the ACLU think there is any difference in automating this task? If I am evading insurance requirements, or have a fake tag on my vehicle, does the ACLU think forcing the police to do the search manually make it a more sporting chase?
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  2. Its the long term Database and how its used!
    Not the fact Law Enforcement is doing its job stopping Crimes and catching those outside of the Law.
    I'm Honest My tags are up to date I drive my car and my insurance is paid, I'm not breaking the law Why should how and where I travel be saved on a file system someplace?
    This is what the argument is about. And this might be a Privacy infringement! Just like This post and My e-mail are being read or saved to file without my permission!
    Who could pay to use this information? who collects this information? Who can collect this information???
    Who can call me to try and sell me Tires and junk for my car? Or insurance? Or track the fact I called in Sick for work but took a day to goof off instead?
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

     
  3. I understand the issues of databases who/what/when... but the ACLU's point #1 has nothing to do with that:

    1. License plate readers may be used by law enforcement agencies only to investigate hits and in other circumstances in which law enforcement agents reasonably believe that the plate data are relevant to an ongoing criminal investigation.

    Unless I misunderstand the wording, this point would essentially make all random plate searches by law enforcement illegal, unless an existing crime is being investigated, which in my opinion is ludicrous. License plates are there to identify the car and the owner publicly to law enforcement, we have no privacy guarantee of the display of a license plate.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

 

Have an opinion? Join the conversation!

Advertisement
Advertisement
Try My Showroom
Save cars, write notes, and comparison shop with hi-res photos.
Add your first car
Take Us With You!
   
Advertisement

 
© 2014 The Car Connection. All Rights Reserved. The Car Connection is published by High Gear Media. Stock photography by izmo, Inc. Send us feedback.
Advertisement