Advertisement
Find a Car
Go!

Feds Request A Recall Of 2.7M Jeep Vehicles, Chrysler Pushes Back

Follow Bengt

2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee Limited

2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee Limited

Enlarge Photo
Do some model years of the Jeep Grand Cherokee and Jeep Liberty pose a higher fire risk to their occupants in a crash? And is it because of a safety-related defect?

The federal government alleges that the answers to both questions are yes; but in a rare, public pushback to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), Chrysler Group contends that the vehicles—potentially 2.7 million of them in all—are safe, and not defective.

Usually, automakers pre-emptively issue recalls well before the government orders them, and it's become very rare in recent years for an automaker to provide this kind of resistance.

“The company does not agree with NHTSA’s conclusions and does not intend to recall the vehicles cited in the investigation,” said Chrysler in an official response to a NHTSA recall letter issued this week.

Feds connect at least 49 fire deaths, many more injuries

In the letter to Chrysler, the federal agency notes that there have been “numerous fire-related deaths and injuries, fires that did not result in deaths and fuel leaks in rear impacts.”

“As discussed more fully below, ODI believes that the MY 1993-2004 Grand Cherokee and MY 2002-2007 Liberty contain defects related to motor vehicle safety,” writes the federal agency. “Accordingly, ODI requests that Chrysler initiate a safety recall of these vehicles.”

The letter outlines the checkered safety history of vehicles with fuel tanks located aft of the rear axle (Ford's Pinto is one of the most often mentioned, and it is here). It also notes that with the original 'ZJ' Grand Cherokee, the fuel tank was moved back, to be in close proximity to the rear bumper.

At issue is that the Grand Cherokee's higher ride height also makes its rear-mounted tank more vulnerable in impacts—when it's rear-ended by a passenger car, for instance.


Advertisement
 
Follow Us

 

Have an opinion?

  • Posting indicates you have read this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
  • Notify me when there are more comments
Comment (1)
  1. I find it interesting that Chrysler said there isn't a problem and the vehicles are safe. Yet, Chrysler moved the fuel tank in a redesign of the vehicle to a location in front o the rear axle. Sounds to me like they know something they're not wanting to admit to.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

 

Have an opinion? Join the conversation!

Advertisement
Advertisement
New Car Price Quotes
Update ZIP
We are committed to your privacy. By submitting this form you agree the phone number you provided may be used to contact you (including autodialed or pre-recorded calls). Consent is not a condition of purchase.
Try My Showroom
Save cars, write notes, and comparison shop with hi-res photos.
Add your first car
Take Us With You!
   
Related Used Listings
Browse used listings in your area
Advertisement

 
© 2015 The Car Connection. All Rights Reserved. The Car Connection is published by High Gear Media. Stock photography by izmo, Inc. Send us feedback.
Advertisement