Now the question is more along the lines of: Why do you need the V-6?
The reason? Smoother four-cylinder engines now prove their mettle, with surprisingly good acceleration and fuel economy thanks to a host of fuel-saving technologies, plus transmissions that really make the most of them—earning fuel economy ratings that are simply great, at up to 38 mpg highway for the Altima and up to 36 highway for the Accord.
Yet on either of these models—even as rivals like the Hyundai Sonata, Kia Optima, Chevrolet Malibu, and Ford Fusion have dropped the V-6 option entirely, in favor of turbo fours—you can still opt up to a V-6.
Are these models worth the premium for the V-6, and if you want to go the strong, smooth route with one, which is better? We recently revisited both the 2013 Honda Accord V6 Touring and 2013 Nissan Altima 3.5 SL with this question in mind. Between these two, it was a close call, so follow along and we’ll tell you the what and why.
Powertrain. First and foremost, powertrain. The Nissan Altima has a 270-horsepower, 3.5-liter V-6, while the Honda Accord has a 278-horsepower, 3.5-liter V-6. Both engines are very strong, smooth, and refined, and it’s now a tossup, even when you consider the engine and transmission. Nissan’s continuously variable automatic transmission (CVT) gives the Altima V-6 a laid-back personality, and it gathers speed deceptively fast and easy; the CVT also works far better with this V-6 than in Nissan’s smaller cars, raising revs quickly whenever needed for bursts of power, and offering steering-wheel paddle shifters that let you ‘pretend’ it’s a conventional automatic. Meanwhile, the six-speed automatic in the Accord is smoother than Honda’s previous-generation automatics, as well as more responsive to downshift. While they’re nearly identical in performance, we might give the Accord the edge in sound alone; the Accord snaps through the gears with a sophisticated snarl, while the Altima tends to drone when you push it.
Fuel economy. In real-world fuel economy, we saw much better with the Altima than the Accord, but we put more miles on the Altima. The Altima earns a 31-mpg highway rating, while the Accord’s six-speed automatic allows a 34-mpg highway rating for the V-6—thanks also to Variable Cylinder Management (VCM).
Handling. In handling, we found some surprises. While in previous model years we might have chosen the Accord over the Altima, the new Accord makes some significant advances in steering feel and suspension tune—yes, even though it drops the double wishbones—and it manages to have great body control with a relatively firm ride that can soak up potholes and the most jarring bumps. The Altima, on the other hand, could be a little harsh in its last-generation version; but now it’s on the soft side, and we weren’t big fans of the steering feel, which is too light and doesn’t manage much feel of the road. Both cars are confident, but we’ll give this one to the Accord.
Interface. As you go up the model line for either of these popular sedans, you add features like navigation and upgraded audio, and they take up a little more dash real estate. And in experiencing both of these models, we couldn’t help but notice how refreshingly clean and simple the controls of the Altima are compared to those of the Accord. We give the Altima a big edge in user-friendliness for the interior; the interface isn’t any more complicated than it needs to be, and somehow they cleaned out nearly as many buttons as Honda without adding confusion.