Advertisement
Find a Car
Go!

Critics Attack Plan To Lower Blood Alcohol Limits: How Can We End Drunk Driving?

Follow Richard

World map of blood alcohol content limits (via NTSB)

World map of blood alcohol content limits (via NTSB)

Enlarge Photo

Last week, the National Transportation Safety Board urged states to lower the blood alcohol content limit for motorists from .08 to .05. Doing so, the NTSB argued, would reduce the number of drunk driving incidents and the number of alcohol-related traffic fatalities.

Reducing traffic deaths seems like a laudable goal, but some organizations weren't enthusiastic about the NTSB's proposal. Perhaps its loudest critic was the American Beverage Institute, a trade association (and lobbying group) for restaurants and liquor stores. In a statement, the group's managing director, Sarah Longwell, said quite clearly, "The NTSB’s reasoning is impaired".

Longwell went on to argue that drinkers in the .05 to .08 range aren't a major problem on the roads: "The average BAC level of a drunk driver involved in a fatal accident is a whopping 0.16 percent—twice the current legal limit. In fact, 70 percent of drunk driving deaths involve a driver with a BAC of 0.15 or higher."

The National Restaurant Association was none too pleased with the NTSB's plan, either. (Which isn't surprising, since alcohol sales have a high profit margin and help keep restaurants in the black.) The Association issued its own statement to the Wall Street Journal, which echoed many of ABI's concerns: "We feel measures addressing drunk driving should be focused on repeat, chronic offenders who drink excessively then drive, and not the millions of Americans who enjoy an adult beverage in a responsible manner with their meal".

Even the Governors Highway Safety Association and Mothers Against Drunk Driving were cautious about supporting the NTSB's proposal. In fact, neither offered an endorsement, with both preferring to focus on other initiatives -- like MADD's push to have ignition interlocks installed on new cars.

SO, HOW DO WE CURB DRUNK DRIVING?

The NTSB insists that lowering BAC levels would save around 500 - 800 lives per year. The agency points out that plenty of countries have similar laws in place; in fact, over 100 countries on six continents have set the BAC threshold at .05 or lower.

But the last time America tried to reduce BAC levels, it took nearly 20 years to get every state onboard. It's true that traffic fatalities fell during that time, but the percentage of deaths attributed to drunk driving has remained constant, at around 30% of the total. Of the 32,367 fatalities recorded in 2011, 9,878 were caused by drunk drivers. What can we do to change that?

Increase education: Drunk-driving awareness programs impact public attitudes. Over time, these programs have made drunk driving far, far less socially acceptable. Increasing the number and reach of such programs would theoretically enhance that effect, encouraging drinkers to reconsider getting behind the wheel, thereby reducing the number of accidents.  

Increase enforcement: There's nothing quite like seeing a sobriety test point to get drivers' attention. Beefing up enforcement -- or just the threat of enforcement -- could force drivers to self-police their drinking and driving habits.

Increase regulation of automobiles: Ignition interlocks are often installed on the vehicles of those convicted of drunk driving. Advances in technology have made deploying such systems far less expensive than they once were -- in fact, you may soon be able to put one on your smartphone. MADD is pushing for these devices to become mandatory in new vehicles, which could cut down on the number of Americans who drive drunk.

BOTTOM LINE

Drunk driving will probably persist as long as alcohol remains legal. (We tried to change that once. It didn't work so well.)

It would be easy to throw up our hands and say, "Well, there's nothing to be done about drunk driving", but there's always something to be done. The question is, what?

[h/t John Voelcker]

___________________________________________

Follow The Car Connection on FacebookTwitter and Google+.

Posted in:
Advertisement
 
Follow Us

 

Have an opinion?

  • Posting indicates you have read this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
  • Notify me when there are more comments
Comments (2)
  1. I can see the point of view of the NTSB. But, what it comes down to is this: Regardless of what percentage law makers make the BAC (blood alcohol content) number people who have problems with alcohol and can't judge when to stay of the road will continue to do so regardless of what the BAC is at for the legal definition of drunk driving.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  2. Dropping the blood alcohol level to 0.05 will not improve public safety. Statistics prove that impaired drivers that cause death and property damage are almost always at or above 0.14. This new lower level is not designed to save lives; it's a clever hoax, designed to generate hundreds of millions of dollars in new revenues for the states and the lawyers, disguised as a public safety measure. Its collateral damage will create economic hardship for related businesses and the general public, while criminalizing many more innocent people. It's a terrible idea.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

 

Have an opinion? Join the conversation!

Advertisement
Try My Showroom
Save cars, write notes, and comparison shop with hi-res photos.
Add your first car
Advertisement
Take Us With You!
   
Advertisement

 
© 2014 The Car Connection. All Rights Reserved. The Car Connection is published by High Gear Media. Stock photography by izmo, Inc. Send us feedback.