By
Bengt Halvorson
Bengt Halvorson
Deputy Editor
BIO
Bengt Halvorson is Deputy Editor of High Gear Media's portfolio of car sites, overseeing the production of reviews, evaluating vehicles firsthand...
More
LATEST ARTICLE
2013 Honda Accord V6 Touring: Driven
The Honda Accord is now in its ninth generation, and as we reported in our First Drive of the 2013...
Read More
- #2LEADERBOARD RANK
- 2657ARTICLES CONTRIBUTED
- 108COMMENTS POSTED
To a very small, select group of enthusiasts, diesel cars or utility vehicles have a lot of allure, with their strong, fuel-efficient engines and, for the most part, a great reputation for long-haul durability.
Yet for the rest of us who don’t delight in ‘b5’ biodiesel pumps or pine for compression ignition, whether or not it makes sense to buy a diesel is mostly a question of economics.
Motorists who cover more than the typical number of miles per year, and tend to do most of it on the highway, could see some reasonably strong cost advantages from driving a diesel car or utility vehicle, versus a gasoline version of the same. Their fuel savings alone, in many cases, could make up their somewhat higher sticker prices in just a few years.
But fuel costs are just part of the picture; the other reason why going with the diesel model keeps your costs lowest is that diesels—currently, and for years now—have had far superior resale value. In fact, if you're the type to trade every few years, they're commanding premiums that quickly negate—in some cases, before even figuring in the fuel savings—any premium you'll pay when new.
For instance, according to
Kelley Blue Book, assuming typical miles for both, a 2010 Volkswagen Jetta TDI is now commanding close to $19,900 ($22,830 MSRP when new), while an SEL sedan ($23,455 when new) is now worth about $16,500.
Diesel owners enjoying very low depreciation
According to recent data from ALG—one of the foremost authorities for residual values (predicted resale values)—used diesels are holding their value far better than used hybrids. The typical compact car, like the Chevrolet Cruze, retains about 53 percent of its original MSRP after 36 months. Compact hybrids, including the Toyota Prius, will retain 55 percent on average, estimates ALG, while diesel models will still be worth 63 percent of their original value.
With the introduction this year of the 2014 Jeep Grand Cherokee EcoDiesel, 2014 Chevrolet Cruze Clean Turbo Diesel, and Mazda 6 Diesel, the field of diesel models has grown in a way that should please diesel owners and new-car shoppers.
Meanwhile, sales of new diesels are already on the rise. Year-over-year, ALG notes that the overall diesel market share in 2012 rose from 1.5 percent up to 1.7 percent. Hybrids gained in 2012, too, and they remain about double that of diesels in overall U.S. market share, however.
Market gaining fast, but still small
Looking at 2012, year-over-year, Volkswagen more than doubled its passenger-car diesel sales (due in part to the mid-size Passat), while its sales of diesel light trucks were up 88 percent. Mercedes-Benz diesel sales are just a fraction of that, but this past year in the M-Class, (ML 350 Bluetec especially) it more than quadrupled its diesel light-truck sales.
Oddly, the factor that right now makes diesels so fiscally attractive—their trade-in value—might not do as well if the market has too many new diesels.
ALG, in a recent statement, confirmed that diesels' strong residuals have been in part due to their scarcity on the used-car market; so that as their supply increases, residuals could come down.
That, in turn, could erase the financial benefits of choosing a new diesel model in the first place—or possibly make leases prohibitively expensive if automakers put more diesels out than the market's ready for.
Have an opinion?
This is bunk. As an engineer, I know that there are actually less parts in a diesel car, especially the engine, than there are in a gasoline equivalent.
It is true that initial engineering, research and development costs were higher, but one has to bear in mind that these were already offset by two factors:
a) the current diesel engines, which are just coming on the market have been developed over the last 20 (!!!) years;
b) the research and development cost is recouped in volume sales.
Which "related expenses"? It costs up to (can be cheaper, in fact!) $100,000 USD to get the EPA certification, and that includes any and all EPA and U.S. DOT modifications.
Taking an average price of $25,000 USD per vehicle, and assuming an average profit of $10,000 USD per vehicle, the cost of certifying a vehicle is offset by selling only 10 units.
These myths about diesels costing more to make are nothing more than propaganda perpetuated by manufacturers' marketing departments, and aided wittingly or unwittingly by auto journalists.
Take it from an engineer: it's bunk. The whole premise.
I'm also not seeing bio-diesel being mentioned...that is usually cheaper than gas and thirdly the extended highway range of diesel saves you time AND money ..less stops mean less buying of crap at the fuel stop and less trip time....it cut my ski trips into a single tank journey
The other issue to consider is that if you pay the premium price for a deisel engine, the vehicles won't last as long as the engine. I recently traded in my 2001 Dodge RAM with the Cummins Diesel - It had 189,000 miles. The engine ran great, everything else had completely fallen apart. For a truck I paid $45,000 for I got $1900 at trade in.
Have an opinion?Join the conversation!