Advertisement
Find a Car
Go!

Following In Hyundai's Footsteps, Ford Sued Over C-Max, Fusion Fuel Economy

Follow Richard

2013 Ford C-Max Hybrid

CORRECTION: See below

It's been an interesting couple of years for Ford.


The automaker is still riding a wave of popularity in the wake of its decision not to take bailout dough from the federal government during the Great Recession. Along the way, Ford's reputation has been buffed by some truly breathtaking redesigns, like those of the 2012 Focus, 2013 Escape, and 2013 Fusion. 

But the ride hasn't been entirely smooth. The 2013 Escape has been subject to four recalls, while the 2013 Fusion has stumbled through two. And for several years, the company has fielded complaints about its MyFord Touch and Sync infotainment systems, which have negatively impacted Ford's initial quality rankings.

Most recently, there's been a good deal of chatter about fuel efficiency estimates for two of the automaker's newest hybrids: the 2013 Ford C-Max Hybrid and the 2013 Ford Fusion Hybrid. Both are rated at a combined fuel economy of 47 mpg, but many critics and consumers have had difficulty achieving that under real-world conditions.

Unfortunately for Ford, the Environmental Protection Agency recently found two other automakers -- Hyundai and Kia -- guilty of overstating fuel economy on 13 models. That discovery has focused national attention on the issue, which hasn't boded well for Ford.

Now, just as with Hyundai and Kia, Ford is facing lawsuits over fuel economy claims. According to AutoNews, Richard Pitkin of Roseville, California filed a federal suit against Ford on December 7 (PDF). Pitkin purchased a 2013 C-Max Hybrid and claims to earn a combined 37 mpg, or 10 miles below the vehicle's advertised fuel economy. He seeks class-action status for his lawsuit, accusing Ford of fraud, negligent misrepresentation, and other wrongs.

On behalf of both C-Max Hybrid and Fusion Hybrid owners, Pitkin asks:

  • That Ford "rescind the sales of subject vehicles purchased in California and/or reimburse Plaintiffs and the Class members the purchase price for those subject vehicles";
  • That Ford "cease engaging in false advertising and..disseminate an informational campaign to correct its misrepresentations and material omissions".

In other words, he wants Ford to buy back all 2013 C-Max Hybrids and Focus Hybrids sold in California and amend advertising for the two models.

(Interestingly, as AutoNews points out, Pitkin is represented by McCuneWright LLP, which has also filed suits against Hyundai and Kia over their fuel economy claims.)

OUR TAKE

This will be an important test case for Ford and for consumers. While some owners have been able to achieve Ford's advertised fuel economy, many -- including journalists at High Gear Media and elsewhere -- have not.

But more importantly, these discrepancies may point to a deeper flaw in the EPA's fuel efficiency tests. While those tests have a degree of consistency for conventional gas-powered vehicles (as most of the 13 Hyundai and Kia models were), they can generate radically different results for hybrids. The C-Max and the Fusion aren't the only hybrids that have had trouble living up to their advertised fuel economy: even the Toyota Prius has come up several miles short.

For now, Ford is standing firm on its fuel economy claims for the C-Max and Fusion, and the automaker is in talks with the EPA to discuss possible adjustments to efficiency tests for hybrids that will lessen confusion for customers. We'll keep you posted as those discussions -- and this lawsuit -- progress.

CORRECTION: A previous version of this story said that Hyundai and Kia had been fined by the EPA for advertising false fuel economy figures for 13 models. While the EPA did conduct audits of Hyundai and Kia's product lineup, and while the EPA did find those 13 models to be off by up to six miles per gallon, the EPA has not yet decided whether it will fine the two automakers. Hyundai and Kia have admitted fault and will compensate owners at a cost of approximately $100,000,000 per year for the forseeable future. A series of lawsuits are also pending.


 
Follow Us

 

Have an opinion?

  • Posting indicates you have read this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
  • Notify me when there are more comments
Comments (7)
  1. What a waist of time and energy! Do people really belive that kind of publicity? Only if you believe that the earth is flat and that the sun goes around it! And if they are misleaded by the advertising the cars stil do better than the others. And if they engage a lawsuits against Ford they will have to o with the others. Sometime I really suprise by the none sens of some matters, but it must be me, how can all these men can be wrong!
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  2. If Ford can run their cars through the government tests and deliver the results displayed on their window sticker -- then the issue is with the test and not the cars. In Hyundai's case they couldn't -- so their numbers were fudged. Big difference.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

     
  3. Dan: It's not entirely clear that Ford has done so. If there's an EPA audit, though -- as there was with Hyundai and Kia -- we may find out.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  4. I've read several articles about the Ford CMax and Fusions not getting the claimed 47mpg gas mileage that is EPA ratings. I have a CMax Hybrid for over 7k miles and HAVE on several occasions gotten over the 47mpg. The key is you need to be going under 50-55 mph in steady moving traffic with slow and go conditions. I did at least 3 trips that got over 47mpg each about 35-45 miles. I reset my odometer every time I fill up and just happened to see the mileage at the end of my trip. I even took a picture of a couple of trips and have proof. If you drive normally such as 75-85 on highways, you'll never get better than about 40 with my overall average 37.5 over about 7400 miles. Don't forget that the 47 is probably with no accessories turned on.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

     
  5. Sorry Joe, but the 47 that Ford advertises is from the tests Ford conducts using the EPA guidlines. If the EPA decides to verify the results that FORD got in the tests then they can and will do so which is the case now. This is why all the news about it is continued and the lawsuits are starting because the EPA has not confirmed and announced the results of EPA verification of Ford tests.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  6. The EPA conducts it's milage tests under what it calls "ideal conditions". Problem is two fold: 1): Every driver has a different driving style (in some cases VASTLY different) and 2:) not evey driver faces the same driving conditions and situations every day. The solution I feel is to develope a better way or system of factors to determine these numbers.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  7. I thought my C-MAX would be a Prius Killer? As a cross over buyer I feel deceived. I want to support US companies and US jobs. What was Ford thinking when they published 47/ 47 estimates? I would have been ok with low 40's but low 28-33 is not even in the ballpark. Mark my words there will be no fix for this. Ford should offer to take the cars back or offer cash compensation to offset the mileage claims. The EPA estimates will have to be adjusted to the mid 30's and sell the cars as is. My dealer's sales and service department were ok at the beginning of the complaint process, but now have turned hostile and un-professional.

    Ronald Kramer
    Yankee Ford Customer
    South Portland, Maine
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

Advertisement
Get great deals on the 2013 Ford C-Max Hybrid!
By clicking above, you agree that your data will be subject to our Car Quotes Privacy Policy
Advertisement
Take Us With You!
Advertisement

More From High Gear Media


 
 
© 2013 The Car Connection. All Rights Reserved. The Car Connection is published by High Gear Media. Stock photography by Homestar, LLC. Send us feedback.