Advertisement
Find a Car
Go!

Aging Boomers Won't Wreck America's Roads: Here's Why

Follow Richard

Relative claim frequencies by rated driver age, calendar year 2010 (from HLDI)

Relative claim frequencies by rated driver age, calendar year 2010 (from HLDI)

Enlarge Photo

We've all heard about Baby Boomers and how they're hurtling toward retirement. We've also read numerous studies that show older drivers are more accident prone when they get behind the wheel.

So, should we fear the thought of this massive generation tumbling into senior-citizendom (joining their parents, who are living longer thanks to the miracles of modern medicine)? Will the highways of tomorrow be strewn with fender-benders and pileups, caused by the Me Generation?

Not at all, says the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. 


In its most recent Status Report (PDF), the IIHS cited a study from its sister organization, the Highway Loss Data Institute. That study explored a wide array of factors affecting accident rates and ultimately determined that, despite America's increasing number of older drivers, the number of collisions should remain stable. In fact, it might even decline.

That seems a little counter-intuitive, but let's look at the study's major findings:

1. Compared to those in middle-age, seniors have substantially higher insurance claim rates, which translates to a higher number of accidents. The trend begins to pick up speed around age 70 and increases with age.

2. That said, seniors are gradually becoming better drivers. In fact, an IIHS study of accidents and fatalities between 1997 and 2009 revealed that among motorists 80 and older, "the fatal crash rate dropped by nearly half, while it fell 23 percent for those age 35 to 54".

3. The reason for that decline aren't clear, but it may be related to something that AAA discovered earlier this year -- namely, that older motorists tend to self-police their driving habits to avoid causing accidents. Whether we want to chalk that up to acquired wisdom or to fear of losing their licenses (and all the inconvenience that would bring) is a matter for debate.

4. America's worst drivers are found at the opposite end of the spectrum, between the ages of 15 and 24. In fact, motorists under 19 have roughly 70% more collision claims than the national average.

5. However, the number of younger drivers is decreasing due to a combination of factors. For example, as panelists at SEMA recently lamented, just 49% of Americans 17 and under have driver's licenses today, compared to 79% in 1978. Moreover, many young people live in urban areas where owning a vehicle is both impractical and unnecessary. And frankly, social media makes in-person interaction (and thus, driving) far less important to today's  teens.

6. Add all that up, and you find an aging population of drivers who are being more mindful of their driving habits, and a smaller population of drivers set to replace them. That would imply that down the road, collision rates will be lower than they are today -- which is on-trend with HLDI's statistics.

We would also like to mention one thing that the IIHS largely avoided in its report, which is the growing number of safety systems available on modern vehicles. Though we may still be years away from fully autonomous Google-branded cars, features like lane-assist, brake-assist, and collision-avoidance are available on many modern vehicles, and before long, we'd expect to see most of those devices come standard. That could reduce collision rates across the board -- not just among older drivers. 


 
Follow Us

 

Have an opinion?

  • Posting indicates you have read this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
  • Notify me when there are more comments
Comments (2)
  1. When I first became an auto safety engineer (1965)0 data indicate that driver-adulthood began at age 25 - generally after the stabilizing influence of marriage. I confess that it worked for me. Now the data seems to say that has risen to ~30.

    I believe that the overall improvement, especially for seniors, is because they can afford to buy cars with newer crash-avoidance and crash-survival features.

    When I began crash testing, a ten-mph run into a concrete barrier was considered surely fatal. Today the driver should be able to walk away from a 30 mph hit. Crash fires are now exceedingly rare (except on TV).

    I am now 82+ years old and I won't deny that my abilities have gone bad. But, when I started, I did not really want to live
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

     
  2. Oops - pressed POST too soon. I did not really want to live past age 55 because then high-G driving was a no-no.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

 
© 2013 The Car Connection. All Rights Reserved. The Car Connection is published by High Gear Media. Stock photography by Homestar, LLC. Send us feedback.