Advertisement
Find a Car
Go!

EPA Red-Flags Hyundai Elantra, Kia Sorento, 11 Others For Gas Mileage Ratings

Follow Richard

2011 Hyundai Elantra

The Environmental Protection Agency has revealed that Hyundai and Kia misstated fuel economy stats on 13 models from the 2011, 2012, and 2013 model years, including on best-sellers such as the Hyundai Elantra and Kia Sorento.

As a result the Korean automakers have been ordered to amend window stickers on vehicles in showrooms and to pay damages to 900,000 owners across the U.S.


The problem was raised a year ago, when Consumer Watchdog began badgering the EPA to conduct tests on the 2011 Hyundai Elantra.

Hyundai claimed that the sedan achieves 29 mpg city, 40 mpg highway, for a combined rating of 33 mpg. However, consumers and critics have complained that  under real-world conditions, their best results fell in the mid-20s. Similar complaints were lodged against the 2012 Elantra.

And so, the EPA conducted an audit. The findings were not good.

In fact, the findings were poor enough that the Agency expanded its audit to other 2011, 2012, and 2013 model-year vehicles manufactured by Hyundai and its sibling, Kia. As it turns out, the Elantra's fuel economy wasn't the only figure that was overstated.

In all, discrepancies were found on 13 models, including the Hyundai Accent, Azera, Elantra, Genesis, Santa Fe, Sonata Hybrid, Tucson, and Veloster. The Kia Optima Hybrid, Rio, Sorento, Soul, and Sportage were also sold with incorrect fuel economy stats.

Penalties

According to the Associated Press, the EPA has ordered both Hyundai and Kia to amend window stickers on roughly 30 percent of the vehicles currently in showrooms. Most will change by only a mile or two. Some, like the popular Kia Soul, will lose as many six miles per gallon.

What's more, Hyundai and Kia are likely to pay some sort of restitution to over 900,000 owners who've already purchased 2011, 2012, and 2013 models. So far, the plan is to contact owners, calculate their mileage to date, and determine how much more they've spent on fuel than if the window stickers had been correct.

Kia's Michael Sprague gave the example of a vehicle with a 1-mpg difference that had 15,000 miles on the odometer. The owner of that vehicle would receive compensation in the amount of $88.03, which includes a 15-percent premium for the inconvenience. 

Such payments will be made every year via debit card, for as long as the owner drives the vehicle. Multiply that $88.03 figure by 900,000, and you get a figure of $79,227,000, which is probably at the low end. That's a sizable chunk to take out of Hyundai/Kia profits.

The EPA noted that this is the first time it has uncovered such a vast number of discrepancies in fuel economy. In fact, this sort of error has only been found twice in the past 12 years -- and even then, the investigations affected just one vehicle at a time. The EPA also said that its investigation is ongoing and refused to indicate whether Hyundai and Kia might be fined or slapped with criminal charges.

Hyundai and Kia have apologized profusely for the fiasco. John Krafcik, Hyundai's CEO of American operations, insists that the problem was administrative and procedural in error, and was not intentional. Sung Hwan Cho, president of Hyundai's U.S. technical center in Michigan, said the same, noting that the mixup stemmed from the complex nature of EPA tests, which happened as the two car companies were tweaking vehicles to boost fuel economy.

For customers, past and present

If you're shopping for a new car and have your eye on a Hyundai or Kia, Krafcik says that you can breathe easy: window stickers on showroom vehicles have been amended to reflect accurate fuel economy stats.

If you already own a Hyundai or Kia, however, you should visit HyundaiMPGInfo.com or KiaMPGInfo.com to start the ball rolling on your claim.


 
Follow Us

 

Have an opinion?

  • Posting indicates you have read this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
  • Notify me when there are more comments
Comments (13)
  1. And the bubble bursts.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  2. The rodents who buy those crapboxes will continue to snap them up without pause.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  3. I recently purchased a 2013 Kia Sorento. First, let me say that I really like the car. I came will a lot of terrific features for the price. I did plenty of research on cars in this class, including Consumer Reports.We have put on about 1300 miles so far. The first thing I noticed after we purchased the car was when using our GPS, which is very accurate, with our other vehicles the speedometer were dead on with the GPS. Not the Sorento. It was reading 2 MPH faster than what the actual speed was.Um? So we took a long trip of about 400 miles to see family. After driving about 150 miles, the MPG was averaging 28.6. I was a little concerned.EPA expected 32 mph, but we know thats generally 2 miles high..okay 30 mph is not bad. continued
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  4. We filled up at about 300 miles into the trip. This time I decided to top off the tank, reset the computer again, and write down the mileage and figure the MPG the old fashion way. What I found was that on a relatively flat terrain, two average size people, doing the limit of 70 mph, cruise control set,we were really getting 26.4 mpg.On several tries too. Crap! That is a far cry for the rated 32 mpg highway, 22 mpg city, 25 mpg combined. The computer has been reading at least two miles higher per gallon than actual. That means 6 miles per gallon highway less than advertised. That is terrible. I checked my city driving in the same fashion, which is mostly highway. Computer shows 20.5 mpg, math says 18 mph. Now I am mad and depressed. continu
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  5. I purchased this 2013 Kia Sorento for the fuel economy, and that's not happening. This is just fraudulant. Ah, two miles higher on the speedo. Causes you to drive two slower, inceasing fuel economy. Sneaky. I took it to the dealer. They gave me some story about break in period and 5w-20 oil after break in and increased fuel mileage. Well, the break in oil is 5w-20 too. 5w-20 oil is thinner oil. Mnufactures increase their mpg, because it is thinner and provides less sticky friction than heavier weight oils like 30 or 40 weight oils. At best,it may increase in 1 to 1.5 mpg. They want me to wait 3000 miles and come back. That will be to late, I will thoroughly own this thing then. I came home this evening and was looking for Fuel reviews.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  6. Well, there it is. Kia Hundai looking at a 774 million dollar class action suit due to misrepresenting EPA fuel estimates, and possible criminal prosecution. Perfect....All I wanted was good fuel economy. By the way, we purchasethe more efficient 4l-GDI engine for and extra $2000.00. Beware and be careful. I alos found out they had misrepresenting the fuel on a few of their 2012 models and carried it over to their 2013 model. And, they say it was a mistake. Fat chance. They knew. Kia has a fuel reimbursement plan for their erroneous errors. They will reimburse a percentage in the difference of mileage you getting to what they promised and issue you a debt card and credit one a year. The catch is you,have to go to the dealer every 90 days
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  7. to get the credit, for life. That is a GIANT INCONVENIENCE.! So,I hope this helps you. I guess I am going to jump on the Class action suit Band Wagon. I wonder how many miles to the gallon it will get? KIA owners, watch you mail for the class notice. I would think it's coming soon. Todd 11-16-2012
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  8. P.S. Sorry about the typing errors. It's late and i just wanted to get it done.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  9. Hi! everyone,
    In 2007 I got me a New Kia Rio5. Nice little car. Gas mileage said 50mpg Wow!!was I happy a fuel efficient car. I never made more then 42mpg even new. Disappointed big time! Never again will I trust Kia or Hyundai!!! I wish I could be compensated someway or another. Any suggestion?
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  10. Purchased a 2012 KIA Optima Turbo end of May 2012. Posted gas milage Canadian was up to 49 mpg (bigger gallon than US). Didn't expect that, but thought 40 would be reasonable. First problem, black soot on back bumper and tailpipe, mentioned it at first oil change, nothing done. Readout on odometer inaccurate, but 33 mpg CDN around city (figured out manually). Came down to Phoenix on interstate, same milage. Have been in contact with two dealers in AZ, KIA Canada agreed to change injectors, done before Christmas, long trip to Las Vegas to check it out, IT IS WORSE! (27 mpg CDN - 22 mpg US) Anyone can see it is burning too rich but unless something comes up on computer, there is no problem. Mechanics who solve problems don't exist.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  11. hey i bought the 2013 kia soretno 2.4 gdi lx and the paper said 21 24 30 and my average with me is in the 18 to highest 19 mpg i tried to apply for the claim and says after nov 2 2012 they dont qualify well if thats the case send out new window sheets with the proper mpg i turned in my 05 chrysler 300 3.5 to save more in gas but it end up the same with a guy said its falls advertisment and when im in a red light the car seems to shake i put it in neutral and it slightly stops i need all the help i could get i love the car but the gas mileage is really putting me down thanks..
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  12. Just ditched a 2013 Hyundai Elantra for a 2013 Honda Accord Sport. Why? Because the larger, more powerful, more comfortable, better handling and quieter Accord gets better REAL WORLD (OBSERVED) mileage than the Elantra running the exact same routes and speeds - both in the city and the highway: Honda 27/38 (ECON engaged) vs Hyundai 22/33 (Active ECO engaged - which has NO impact on fuel economy, but does make the car sluggish as hell).

    Oh yeah, and the Hyundai's dash started creaking and rattling within the first month. After six months, it sounded like the six year old Honda Civic I replaced it with.

    And that was the end of my curiosity about the alleged great strides Hyundai/Kia have made with their latest generation of "products."
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  13. I'm getting 20mpg with my 2013 Hyundai Elantra in Canada.

    Can I return my car or get compensation for this? They still have the advertisements of 30-35mpg here.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

Advertisement
Get great deals on the 2013 Hyundai Accent!
By clicking above, you agree that your data will be subject to our Car Quotes Privacy Policy
Advertisement
Advertisement

 
© 2013 The Car Connection. All Rights Reserved. The Car Connection is published by High Gear Media. Stock photography by Homestar, LLC. Send us feedback.