Find a Car

GM Nixes Support For Conservative Lobbying Group

Follow Richard

Once upon a time, corporations seemed pretty adept at keeping their political activities quiet. But as reps from Lowe'sKraft, and Chick-fil-A will quickly tell you, that ain't the case no more: thanks to the internet and today's 24-hour news cycle, corporate lobbying maneuvers are increasingly easy to uncover and share with folks around the world.

Which may explain why General Motors has decided to cancel its sponsorship of the American Legislative Exchange Council, or ALEC. 

On paper, ALEC describes itself as a nonprofit organization that "works to advance the fundamental principles of free-market enterprise, limited government, and federalism at the state level through a nonpartisan public-private partnership of America’s state legislators, members of the private sector and the general public."

In reality, ALEC lobbies for conservative legislation. That in itself isn't problematic, but according to the Detroit Free Press, ALEC has recently been aligned with two very touchy subjects:

1. "Stand your ground" gun laws, which have been the cause of much controversy since the fatal shooting of Trayvon Martin; and,

2. Voter ID laws, which have been decried by activists as ploys to disenfranchise low-income voters, who may not have driver's licenses.

GM has now cancelled its membership in the group, as well as its annual contribution, which a GM spokesman confirmed was less than $25,000.

However, GM isn't the first company to back out of ALEC. If anything, GM seems a tad late to the game. Amazon, Coca-Cola, McDonald’s, Pepsi, Procter & Gamble, Walgreens, Walmart, and Wendy's are just a few of the corporations that have already stepped down -- in part due to pressure from left-leaning groups like Progress Michigan.

Our take

Corporations have always had a hand in politics. That only makes sense, since so many of the laws passed at the local, state, and federal level affect those companies. It's in businesses' best interest to ensure that laws are favorable to their practices.

But the days of corporations being able to hide their lobbying activities from the general public are quickly coming to an end. Now, companies of all stripes are held accountable for their support of political organizations: if those organizations stir up controversy, the brouhaha will inevitably bleed over and affect their corporate supporters.

Debacles like this one with ALEC won't end corporate lobbying efforts. If anything, they'll probably make the situation more obscure, with lobbying groups hiding their activities behind sub-groups and generally rendering it harder for consumers and the press to follow the proverbial money.

Do you think corporations have an obligation to publicize their lobbying efforts? When should companies back down from certain causes? Is GM's withdrawal from ALEC a good thing or bad? Feel free to drop us an email, or leave a note in the comments below.

Follow Us

Comments (8)
  1. Of course, a corporation such as GM is entitled to support and lobbying for its benefit. You and I can do the same with our Congress critters. But this is just another way for Government Motors to honor its master -Obama - and another reason I hope the corp fails and goes back on the open market w/o g'mt interference.

  2. Comment disabled by moderators.

  3. Being a Republican has nothing to do with it. I know from personal experience how corrupt and inept the old GM bosses were. The corporation should have been allowed to fail by bankruptcy, so that the useful factories and workers could be taken over by other (non-UAW) entities. Ford, Nissan, Honda and Toyota demonstrate intelligent management of US workers. The cronies put in charge at new GM are having a hard time coping with the younger generation salaried and hourly staff. For instance, it appears that the Cadillac division is doing a great job!

  4. Why should GM support a group who was pulling for its bankruptcy? So you hope GM fails? You are an idiot and an unpatriotic dolt.

  5. I think that it is a good move for GM,if the reason for doing so is related to a group who is not willing to look at making changes in the present Gun Control laws.
    On the other hand I do not feel that You or I should be notified, who donates money to which party. That is a personal decision and should not be made public.

  6. if you or I as private US citizens donate to a party it is and should be considered a personal or private decision. When a public company donates to a party or withdrawls support of any particular group...because of that groups standards or goals....that should not be considered private info and yes the PUBLIC should be allowed to know without all the drama of the multi layer cover ups.....that is the difference between private individuals and public companies in my humble opinion :)

  7. I am currently in the market for a car. I drive an 09 Malibu and was considering buying a new Malibu. After reading this I will likely wait and get a new Fusion.

  8. Good for you Gerald. You aren't the only one that feels this way.

Commenting is closed for old articles.
Try My Showroom
Save cars, write notes, and comparison shop with hi-res photos.
Add your first car
Take Us With You!

© 2015 The Car Connection. All Rights Reserved. The Car Connection is published by High Gear Media. Stock photography by izmo, Inc. Send us feedback.