Advertisement
Find a Car
Go!

The Death List: What Cars Aren't Coming Back For 2013? Page 2

By Kurt Ernst
Kurt Ernst Kurt Ernst
Contributor BIO
Kurt has been fascinated by anything with wheels and a motor for a long time. Growing up, he spent his spare time turning wrenches and pumping gas in... More

LATEST ARTICLE
New Cherokee, Cheap Cars, Auto Loan Delinquencies: Car News Headlines
Today at The Car Connection, we tell you about the debut of Jeep’s controversially-styled... Read More
  • N/ALEADERBOARD RANK
  • 2940ARTICLES CONTRIBUTED
  • 152COMMENTS POSTED

19 84,128 views May 18, 2012


2012 Kia Sedona

2012 Kia Sedona

Enlarge Photo
Kia Sedona: Korean automakers have shown they can take on the Japanese and American manufacturers with sedans and crossovers, but not with minivans. The only Korean-brand minivan currently offered in the U.S., the Sedona rides into the sunset after 2012, a victim of lagging sales.

2012 Hyundai Veracruz

2012 Hyundai Veracruz

Enlarge Photo
Hyundai Veracruz: While seven-passenger crossovers aren’t expected to deliver driving excitement, some are blander than others. In a market packed with solid choices from other manufacturers, the Veracruz’s uninspired styling, numb handling and surprising lack of cargo room proved to be its downfall.

2012 Mitsubishi Eclipse SE

2012 Mitsubishi Eclipse SE

Enlarge Photo
Mitsubishi Eclipse: Let’s pause for a moment of silence here, shall we? If you’re a sport compact enthusiast, you know that the Mitsubishi Eclipse actually died with the second generation. Since then, the car has shuffled through various iterations, all of which took it farther away from its original turbocharged, all-wheel-drive, take-no-prisoners-on-the-racetrack mission. It’s worth pointing out that the Eclipse GSX paved the way for cars like the Subaru WRX and Mitsubishi Evo, but let’s be honest here: the real Eclipse was killed off in 1999.

2012 Mitsubishi Galant

2012 Mitsubishi Galant

Enlarge Photo
Mitsubishi Galant: Who knew that Mitsubishi still built and sold a mid-size sedan in the United States? Aside from rental car agencies, the answer appeared to be “not many buyers,” leading to the Galant's demise in the U.S after 2012.

2008 Mitsubishi Endeavor FWD 4-door SE Angular Front Exterior View

2008 Mitsubishi Endeavor FWD 4-door SE Angular Front Exterior View

Enlarge Photo
Mitsubishi Endeavor: Designed specifically for the United States market, the Endeavor was Mitsubishi’s attempt to build a mid-size crossover that catered to American tastes. The automaker boldly forecasted annual sales of some 80,000 units, but never managed to hit half that amount. By 2010, sales had fallen to just over 4,400 units, making the Endeavor unprofitable to build. Like the Galant, it won’t be missed by many.



Tags:
Posted in:
 
Contribute
Send us a tip Comment Contact the editor
Follow Us

 

Have an opinion?

  • Posting indicates you have read this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
  • Notify me when there are more comments
Comments (19)

  1. fb_580773522 avatar Myles Miller Posted: 5/19/2012 8:32am PDT

    okay Saab going under was not GMs fault. Get your facts straight! Saab should have gone under years ago. GM was making bank and bought the company to save it. Yes GM could have done more with the company but money can only be spread so far between all the brands they had.
     
    Post Reply
    -4
    Bad stuff?

     

  2. fb_1491948054 avatar Kurt Ernst Posted: 5/19/2012 10:42am PDT

    @Myles, there's nothing wrong with my facts. Saab had several Chinese investors lined up until GM flexed its preferred-stock muscles and said no, blaming it on a conflict of interest with its existing Chinese partners.

    Look at a Saab 9-5 and you'll see why: it's a parts-bin GM car that can't easily be re-engineered to use other components. Ditto for the 9-4X.

    To your point, Saab didn't die under GM's ownership, however, GM was the company that stepped in and eliminated Saab's chance at a future. I stand by my facts.
     
    Post Reply
    +3
    Bad stuff?

     

  3. fb_1618780262 avatar Wallace Smith Posted: 5/24/2012 11:57pm PDT

    YES! Another inheirited money machine that let it's wrath be known! Funny too! The "parents" struggled there after. Big guns with $ at the time, ruling and bossing everything in sight! Typical of those blow hards! Most had to sell the family farm to survive in their old age! Too stupid and sluggish of mind to update, modernize, and look after their "future" offspring. Another story of BAD CHOICES!
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  4. fb_1185084391 avatar Joe Bresloff Posted: 5/25/2012 8:00am PDT

    Actually, Myles is correct. Even though SAAB was using stuff from the GM parts bin, they altered the vehicles so much from the platform design that they were losing money on every car. GM provided Vauxhall chassis and requested SAAB use them, SAAB agreed and went about it's own way. SAAB was doomed before GN ever got involved.
     
    Post Reply
    -2
    Bad stuff?

  5. crtx avatar crtx Posted: 5/25/2012 8:33am PDT

    I agree with Myles. I still own a SAAB, this is number 5 a 2007 Aero convertible that is more GM than Trollhatten. Its the best one ever, far superior to the electrical plauged problem 2003 and the 1998. SAAB was in trouble long before GM came along and they tried hard to save it.
     
    Post Reply
    -2
    Bad stuff?

  6. fb_509157168 avatar Justin Calderon Posted: 5/25/2012 10:02am PDT

    that's too true dude u r so right GM tried to save them but had other brands they had to keep like Cadillac, Chevrolet, Buick, and GMC
     
    Post Reply
    -2
    Bad stuff?

    7. There are more comments in this thread

  7. fb_100000432296831 avatar fb_100000432296831 Posted: 5/19/2012 3:45pm PDT

    You forgot the VOLT...GM's laughable answer to the economy problem. Buy a VOLT and get tons of extra problems down the road...buy the legend now, you can re-badge it EDSEL.
     
    Post Reply
    -1
    Bad stuff?

     

  8. Ernst avatar Kurt Ernst Posted: 5/20/2012 5:04am PDT

    @Ow, the Volt isn't going away, and that's a good thing.

    I'm sure your anti-Volt opinion is based on personal experience, right? Not just the anti-GM rantings of the right-wing-fringe wackos in mainstream media?

    Because, oddly, I've racked up thousands of miles behind the wheel of various Volts, all of which have been trouble free. As the first series hybrid vehicle produced by a mainstream automaker, history will see the Volt in a much different light than you do.
     
    Post Reply
    +2
    Bad stuff?

     

  9. fb_509157168 avatar Justin Calderon Posted: 5/25/2012 10:05am PDT

    Kurt where do u work at? r u only getting ur facts from newspapers, radio, TV, news, and internet and/or phone? Its more complex and deeper when you actually work for the company itself.
     
    Post Reply
    -1
    Bad stuff?

     

  10. Ernst avatar Kurt Ernst Posted: 5/25/2012 5:39pm PDT

    @Justin, I write about cars for a living. I get my facts from driving the cars I write about, including a drive in the Chevy Volt (prior to its release) from New York City to Detroit.

    Do you work for GM? I'm just curious because you appear to be questioning my experience with the Volt.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  11. fb_100000351085371 avatar Richard Joash Tan Posted: 6/6/2012 1:19am PDT

    you are a troll, because you should be banned form facebook and beyond
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  12. fb_1590102945 avatar Matthew Beall Posted: 5/25/2012 6:04am PDT

    SAAB was a solid car with alot of brand recognition which is why GM bought it in the first place. being such a small company, they were an easy target for GM. I am so sad to see SAAB go, I will never buy a gm product forever more because of my perception of them as huge monster that eats its young
     
    Post Reply
    +1
    Bad stuff?

  13. fb_1584225648 avatar Dan Ottin Posted: 5/25/2012 10:45am PDT

    Buy yourself a Honda Pilot. You will have 5 worry free years of driving. If you take good care of it and change oil every 5,000 miles, there's no reason why it will not last headache free for another 5 years.

    The used car buyer would still be able to enjoy his investment. It is a fact.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  14. fb_100001000932837 avatar Kenneth Sloan Posted: 5/25/2012 12:05pm PDT

    I never owned one, but I'll miss SAAB (sob!)
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  15. fb_100001000932837 avatar Kenneth Sloan Posted: 5/25/2012 12:07pm PDT

    Am looking for a good second-hand car. Am considering the following models, a 2007 Ford Focus, a 2007 Suzuki Forenza? Which should I buy?
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  16. arifepa avatar m s Posted: 5/26/2012 2:24pm PDT

    Kurt, the Sonic is NOT built on the old Aveo platform. It's the GammaII platform.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

     

  17. arifepa avatar m s Posted: 5/26/2012 2:40pm PDT

    That should say Gamma II. :)
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

     

  18. fb_1491948054 avatar Kurt Ernst Posted: 5/29/2012 3:52am PDT

    @ms, mea culpa - the Sonic is indeed built on the Gamma II platform, which is not the same as the last Aveo used.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

Advertisement
Get great deals on the 2012 Lexus HS 250h!
By clicking above, you agree that your data will be subject to our Car Quotes Privacy Policy
Advertisement
Advertisement

More From High Gear Media

 
 
The Car Connection
 
 
© 2013 The Car Connection. All Rights Reserved. The Car Connection is published by High Gear Media. Stock photography by Homestar, LLC. Send us feedback.