Advertisement
Find a Car
Go!

Ford Escape Vs. Honda CR-V: Compare Cars

Follow Marty

Ford Escape Vs. Honda CR-V

Ford Escape Vs. Honda CR-V

Enlarge Photo

The Ford Escape and Honda CR-V are two of the best-selling crossovers on the market. Yet they offer two very different takes on what's important in this kind of vehicle. They're both good for families on a growth spurt, but which one is the better pick and why?

To date, we've only driven just the most sporty, 240-horsepower version of the new Ford Escape. Still, it's easy to pick out the ways in which the new Escape excels--and the ways in which Honda's crossover carves out an even bigger niche for itself.

It boils down to size and fun. If you're looking for the flexible, utility-driven safety specialist, take the CR-V. It's not rated as highly here, but in several critical categories, we've put it ahead of the Escape. The most important scores for families--quality and comfort--are the ones in which the CR-V shines. It's a little smaller than the new Escape in some critical dimensions, but it delivers more usable interior space thanks to a more upright shape with more efficient packaging. The seats are more plushly upholstered, too--and the flip-fold mechanism that turns the second-row seat from passenger perch to cargo bench is the most clever touch in its class. By comparison, the Escape reads more like a tall station wagon, with the combination of a rather low dash but upright driving position feeling a little more carlike overall.


The CR-V also rules the safety rankings, earning not just a top five-star score from the federal government but also IIHS Top Safety Pick status; the Escape is also a Top Safety Pick but it earns only four stars from the feds. It's not a complete smack--down though, as the Escape offers more advanced safety technology like parking sensors and active park assist.

For families hunting down a new commuting appliance, the CR-V works extremely well. That said, after a day's drive in the athletic, attractive new Escape, we'd give it the enthusiast nod, each and every time. Not only does it look the part of a hot hatchback--the CR-V's hunched-over back has nothing on Ford's rally-ready air intakes and rakish angles--the Escape's turbo thrust, ride and handling hold up to repeated thrashings. The electric power steering at least feels like it's in the game; the ride's very well damped, even taut; the 240-horsepower four's able to hit 60 mph in under 8 seconds, even with only a six-speed automatic running plays underfoot. (A pair of less powerful engines are available, too: a 2.5-liter four with 170 hp, and a turbo 1.6-liter four with 178 hp.)

Fuel economy ends up in Ford's corner: the CR-V's top EPA ratings hit 30 mpg, while the best Escape model is rated at 33 mpg highway.

For those times when running around off-road is part of the plan, the Escape can tow up to 3,500 pounds, and has optional all-wheel drive, just like the CR-V. Its cabin has much firmer seats with much thinner padding, which telegraphs a sportier feel without delivering discomfort. Its back seats fold forward too, though not with the final flourish of fold-forward fancy that Honda's mustered in the CR-V.

As for features, the Escape triumphs, though Honda's made good progress. The CR-V now has standard Bluetooth, and streaming audio and mobile connectivity are reality. The Escape feels in a class above, if you shop by feature lists, with options for leather, a panoramic sunroof, MyFord Touch's voice-command controls, even a hands-free tailgate that opens or closes with the wave of a foot.

In the end, it's a decision between brand-new and carefully updated crossovers. The Escape's a wholly different vehicle that the faux-truck that was not so long ago discontinued. The CR-V on the other hand has changed in no-nonsense, evolutionary ways, keeping it at the top of the class for the mission it has in mind. Our advice: If you're so busy you barely have time to think of the driving itself, get the CR-V; but if you want a little fun sprinkled in, the Escape stays true to its name.

2013 Ford Escape 2013 Honda CR-V
2013 Ford Escape EcoBoost 2.0-liter, Pennsylvania, April 2013 2013 Honda CR-V
Meta Rating
8 After eleven years, a change-up: the 2013 Ford Escape drops the faux-SUV pitch and reels off authentically athletic looks and performance. 7.8 The 2013 Honda CR-V hits all the right marks for cost-conscious families—with its interior layout and safety ratings both best-in-class—although it doesn't feel as sprightly as former CR-V models.
Styling
8With dynamic looks that ditch its past, the 2013 Escape crosses over far from its former SUV-lookalike territory. Read more7There's nothing all that memorable or attention-getting about the CR-V from the outside, but simplicity is an asset inside. Read more
Performance
8Taut handling and quick steering work well with the 240-hp turbo four; the Escape is one of the best-handling crossovers in its class. Read more6The 2013 Honda CR-V is smooth and confidence-inspiring, but it's not at all exciting. Read more
Quality
7The Escape has more interior space than before, but the seats are firmer, and it's still down on volume to the CR-V. Read more8The CR-V has one of the best rear seat-folding arrangements in any vehicle; yet materials and trims are lackluster. Read more
Safety
8With an all-new structure and good safety ratings, plus some new safety technology, the new Escape is a secure pick. Read more9With top safety ratings from both U.S. testing agencies, the 2013 Honda CR-V is one of the most secure vehicles of any kind. Read more
Features
9MyFord Touch is improved; leather, a panoramic sunroof, and Sony sound lift the Escape into the near-luxury leagues. Read more9Connectivity features are offered throughout the lineup, and available entertainment systems are on part with those in luxury vehicles. Read more
Green
8Some Escapes will hit EPA-rated highway mileage in the 30s; we've observed low 20s on the sportiest model. Read more7The 2013 Honda CR-V has some of the highest mileage ratings in its class, but tall gear ratios mean that you're not as likely to see them in real-world driving. Read more
MSRP
from $22,470 from $22,795
Invoice
from $21,178 from $21,413
Fuel Economy - Combined City and Highway
25 26
Front Leg Room (in)
40.400 41.3
Second Leg Room (in)
36.800
Read Full Specs
38.3
Read Full Specs

 
Follow Us

 

Have an opinion?

  • Posting indicates you have read this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
  • Notify me when there are more comments
Comments (19)
  1. You are comparing apples and oranges. Ford is a 2013 and the Honda CRV is a 2012.
    It is my understanding that the 2013 CRV will be quite different than the 2012.
    Is there a review on the 2013 CRV? I understand it is out on the car show circuit.
     
    Post Reply
    0
    Bad stuff?

     
  2. The 2012 CR-V is the restyled, revamped model.
     
    Post Reply
    +1
    Bad stuff?

  3. There’s a picture of both vehicles. Can’t you see that the Honda is also the new model just like the Ford?
     
    Post Reply
    -2
    Bad stuff?

     
  4. It seems to be the 2012 CRV model compared here, and its missing a few relatively important upgrades that are standard on the 2013 CRV model, just look it up on the Honda website
     
    Post Reply
    +1
    Bad stuff?

  5. Good info and comparison. My reservations with the Escape would be how well it would hold up over time and its 3 and 5 year residual numbers. We know the Honda is near perfect in those categories.
     
    Post Reply
    0
    Bad stuff?

  6. I have deep reservations about both models. One for personal reasons as to how Honda of America treats it's customers because of first hand experience on my 2004 Honda Accord transmission failure at 80000 miles and the 2013 Escape because it's a new model which is not tried and tested. KIA/Hyundai and Subaru have my vote at the present time.
     
    Post Reply
    +3
    Bad stuff?

  7. According to your own article, the new Escape beats the CRV in size, handling, power, towing, fuel economy and features… yet you still pick the CRV as the winner?

    Give us a break. I bet the author drives one of those ugly CRVs. Enjoy your flip-sold seats.
     
    Post Reply
    0
    Bad stuff?

     
  8. Maybe you read a different article, Rich, but I gave a few reasons to choose the CR-V instead--but more for the Escape, and we ranked the Escape higher on the numeric scale.
     
    Post Reply
    +1
    Bad stuff?

  9. Ford continues to produce class leading vehicles
     
    Post Reply
    +1
    Bad stuff?

  10. Any ford after five years = Garbage
    Any Honda after 10 years = Still running
    I had a ford scape 2005 I paid $ 18000 financed after 5 years sold $ 2000
     
    Post Reply
    +1
    Bad stuff?

  11. You show the 2012 CRV. I've seen photos of the 2013 CRV & the side view from
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  12. You show the 2012 CRV. I've seen photos of the 2013 CRV. On a side view from the 1st roof pillar on back, the 2013 CRV definitely reminds me of a funeral hearse. It looks great from the front and better than average from the rear and the design might be very utilitarian but, that funeral hearse side view will need a lot of fixing. I like the new Escape but the angle from the front to the rear for the windows should be for better viewing & less cosmetics--more like the Ford Edge. The seats, especially the rear, seem not so great for comfort. Two recalls already? For its size & amenities it seems more than a little pricy. My previous new car had 400,000 miles & the current has 210,000. What are the prospects for a turbo lasting that long?
     
    Post Reply
    +2
    Bad stuff?

  13. What about reliability on either cars? The Escape already has 3 recalls - none yet for the CR-V. Though certain CR-Vs (about 260,000 of them) have been recalled due to a window switch.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  14. You are picking and choosing the Ford options to compare to the CRV in your summary. Apples and oranges. You should pick 2 similar models for the Escape and CRV and compare them. For example you have Ford's performance better than CRV since it has much more horse power. In that particular Escape model the "Green" rating is much lower than the CRV since it gets 20/27MPH at best. I've seen reviews where that Escape engine gets 20MPG average. Yet you pick an entirely different Escape 1.6L engine to say it is more "Green" than the CRV 2.4L engine.

    So you are comparing multiple Ford Escape models to a single CRV model.
     
    Post Reply
    +1
    Bad stuff?

  15. "...the CR-V's hunched-over back ..." Who the hell wants to drive a Hunch-Back looking car? The Honda is Too Clunky and Chunky looking. Hoiw long can a car live on its laurels?
     
    Post Reply
    -1
    Bad stuff?

  16. CRV has that grindy, noisy that needs updating and the Escape has the very modern Ecoboost engine .No contest the Escape is a much better vehicle.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  17. One big question. Which vehicle has a higher resale value? I bet the answer is the Honda CRV
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  18. If you do a lot of interstate driving go for the Escape with that 2.0L EcoBoost. You can get a lot of new safety items like blind spot monitoring and rear camera on the Escape without having to buy Navigation.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  19. I have a 02 Ford Escape which I have had some problems w/. I want the same cargo space - how do the others compare?
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

Advertisement
Get great deals on the 2013 Ford Escape!
By clicking above, you agree that your data will be subject to our Car Quotes Privacy Policy
Advertisement
Advertisement

 
© 2013 The Car Connection. All Rights Reserved. The Car Connection is published by High Gear Media. Stock photography by Homestar, LLC. Send us feedback.