2017 Honda CR-VEnlarge Photo
Growing families seem to be choosing compact crossovers more frequently these days than traditional SUVs and minivans. Two fine examples are the Nissan Rogue and Honda CR-V.
Both are fuel-efficient and spacious, and they can be equipped to near-luxury levels of comfort. Plus, they retain much of the appeal of a full-size SUV, without the added heft and rock-scrambling ability—all at prices that are about the same as a mid-size sedan, or maybe even a little less.
The Rogue was recently refreshed, while the CR-V is the recipient of a full redesign for the 2017 model year. We're smitten with the CR-V; while it's not perfect, it fits the needs of families exceptionally well. (Read more about how we rate cars.)
The latest Nissan Rogue offers a racier, uniquely-styled alternative to box-on-box crossovers. Meanwhile, one of our perennial favorites, the Honda CR-V can look a little awkward from some angles, but its jutting front bumper and tall tail lamps hide a terrific utilization of space. Both offer up a blend of safety, practicality and comfort, but when compared head to head, one stands (slightly) above the other.
Nissan’s Rogue, like the larger Nissan Murano, doesn’t look like any other crossover vehicle on the market. Redesigned just last year, the Rogue offers the flexibility and cargo-hauling capability of a small SUV, but drives more like a sedan. In fact, those coming from a small sedan may find the Rogue to be more to their liking than many other compact crossover choices.
The Rogue has a 2.5-liter 4-cylinder engine that delivers 170 horsepower. With its continuously variable automatic transmission (CVT), it delivers reasonable acceleration, taking around 8.0 seconds to run from 0-60 mph. Front-wheel drive is standard, but all-wheel drive is available for those who want it. Added traction comes at a price, though: In addition to raising the sticker price, all-wheel-drive lowers fuel economy by a few miles per gallon.
CR-V LX models utilize a largely carried over 2.4-liter inline-4 engine rated at 184 horsepower and 180 pound-feet of torque. All other trim levels, including the EX, EX-L, and Touring, make use of a more advanced 1.5-liter turbocharged 4-cylinder that checks in with 190 hp and 179 pound-feet, the latter of which is spread across a much wider range of the engine's revolutions. That translates to far quicker acceleration and passing power with from the turbo model than from the standard engine in the LX. Both models make use of a CVT.
Neither of these two models are all that sporty, and it's fair to say that they both prioritize ride over roadholding. The Honda feels perhaps a little more nimble (and tight from wind noise, thanks to double door seals), while the Rogue feels more substantial and damped from road noise (and perhaps slightly sportier) yet it allows a bit more engine noise into the cabin.
Feature for feature
Provided you don't need the convenience of a third row, for carrying kids sometimes—which only the Rogue offers as an option—it's really a tradeoff between these two in interior usability. Although ultimately the CR-V has an advantage when you need to take advantage of every bit of space. The Rogue offer seating that’s neither too high nor too low. The back seat is roomy enough for two adults or three children, and there’s ample cargo room for hauling the trappings of modern life. A low cargo floor also makes loading and removing heavy or bulky items that much easier, adding to the Rogue’s appeal. In the CR-V, cargo space is especially generous with the rear seats in place; and with them folded, the CR-V has a cargo floor that’s over five feet in length. It’s lower than on previous CR-V models as well, which helps loading and unloading heavier objects.