Advertisement
Find a Car
Go!

Nissan Frontier Vs. Toyota Tacoma: Compare Trucks

Follow Marty

Nissan Frontier Vs. Toyota Tacoma

Nissan Frontier Vs. Toyota Tacoma

Enlarge Photo

If you like your trucks small, manageable, and maneuverable, you don't have many choices left on the market. The Dodge Dakota and Ford Ranger are now gone—both without successors—and the Chevrolet Colorado is merely carried through this year, on the way to a major transformation next year into a true mid-sizer.

What remains? There's the Toyota Tacoma and Nissan Frontier, as pretty much your only compact(-ish) alternatives to today's full-size, entry-level trucks. Which of these better fits the needs to compact pickup shoppers or those seeking to cover all the versatility bases? Read on.


The winner in The Car Connection's ratings system is the Nissan Frontier. In our head-to-head ratings, it easily outpaces the Tacoma, even though the Toyota was just updated a year ago.

It starts with a win in performance, where the uprated Nissan V-6 is stronger than the Tacoma's, and feels like it. The Frontier also has better (though not great) ride quality, while matching the Tacoma for ultimate towing capacity of 6,500 pounds. While we wouldn't clamor for either available four-cylinder engine, we'd point out that both trucks continue to offer them, for small gains in gas mileage.

The Frontier also has more comfortable trappings for passengers and more interesting ways to tie down cargo. Available in extended or four-door form, it lacks the regular cab offered on the Tacoma, but the Frontier's seats have more support and offer a more natural seating position, at least in front. Of the pair, the Frontier's back bench offers a little more seat comfort.

Both trucks come in short- and long-bed configurations, in rear- or four-wheel drive, though a full-size eight-foot bed is off the menu on both. Nissan antes up a spray-in bedliner and a built-in set of tie-down cleats, making it a great choice for utility buyers. With either truck, an off-road package enables Baja-style trail running that gives these trucks a tuner appeal all their own.

No truck in this class manages truly great safety ratings, but the Frontier is ahead here, too, scoring very well overall; the Tacoma lags both in the IIHS roof strength test (particularly important for rollover-prone pickups) and in federal testing.

Pickups aren't typically the first vehicles that come to mind when we think of luxury features. Yet the Tacoma now offers in-truck app connectivity for Pandora, voice commands, HD radio, and Bluetooth audio streaming—through its Entune connectivity system. On the Frontier, you'll find Bluetooth and nice-sounding audio systems, but it's not quite as technologically forward.

2013 Nissan Frontier 2013 Toyota Tacoma
2013 Nissan Frontier 2013 Toyota Tacoma 2WD Double Cab I4 AT (Natl) Angular Front Exterior View
Meta Rating
7.6 The 2013 Nissan Frontier is the best alternative to a full-size pickup: it's maneuverable, manageable, and a bit more conscious of gas mileage. 6.2 If you don't truly need a full-size truck, the Toyota Tacoma's price and simplicity could make it a viable alternative--but it can get expensive, and its ride and gas mileage will have you reconsidering your motives.
Styling
7The Frontier looks handsome and tough on the outside, although inside the design is showing its age. Read more6The Tacoma's been with us a while; the interior's shaped up with a recent reskin, but there's no drama here. Read more
Performance
7Go with the V-6 in the 2013 Frontier, and you'll be happy with its confident feel and maneuverability. Read more6Acceleration is acceptable with the V-6, but not with the four--and on-road ride and handling are ponderous at best. Read more
Quality
8The cabin look is more rugged than refined, but a good seating position, decent back-seat space (Crew Cab), and good cargo solutions mean it doesn't miss a beat on usability. Read more5Short on headroom, and in need of better seat shaping, the Toyota Tacoma lacks the space and comfort even of its chief rival. Read more
Safety
8The Frontier is one of the few smaller pickups to do well in roof strength; and you can now get a backup camera. Read more6Crash-test scores haven't been that good with the current Toyota Tacoma. Read more
Features
8Hard-working, hardcore off-roading types have plenty of options; meanwhile navigation is now available and more models get Bluetooth. Read more8If you're into rock climbing and rock music, the Tacoma has the features you'll need to rock out. Read more
Green
6V-6 models of the 2013 Nissan Frontier are no longer as thirsty; but even the four-cylinder Frontier isn't all that fuel-efficient. Read more6Gas mileage hasn't changed much--but the Toyota Tacoma's now not much more efficient than some full-sizers. Read more
MSRP
from $17,990 from $17,625
Invoice
from $17,063 from $16,688
Fuel Economy - Combined City and Highway
21 (2012) 22
Front Leg Room (in)
42.4 41.7
Second Leg Room (in)
25.4
Read Full Specs
N/A
Read Full Specs

 
Follow Us

 

Have an opinion?

  • Posting indicates you have read this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
  • Notify me when there are more comments
Comments (4)
  1. We compared the Tacoma and Frontier when we purchased our 2006 model. We decided that both the Tacoma and Frontier were good choices. However, what swayed us to the Tacoma was the rear seat. The rear seat in the Tacoma is great, not only for a truck, but for any compact four-door vehicle. We use it as our "sedan" as well as our truck. The Frontier's rear seat, however, was awful. You claim that it is more comfortable than the Tacoma's, but did you actually try sitting back there? The back rest is almost vertical, and not a place I'd put anyone I like for more than 5-10 minutes. It's out of the question as a place to sit for an extended trip. Why bother having four doors?
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  2. When I was the market to replace my '95 GMC Sonoma I was going to get another GMC until I heard GM was going to put an I-5 in place of the 4.3 V6. I'm glad I did not buy the GM because the I-5 was a POS from the get-go.
    I looked at the Tacoma and Frontier. What swayed me away from the Tacoma was the composite bed and partial 'C' channel frame on the Tacoma. Pickup trucks have a light enough rear end without making them lighter by using a composite bed and 'C' channel frame.
    The Frontier came with the same genes as it's big brother the Titan(full channel frame) so this was in my mind way to build a truck be it full size or midsize. Plus the 4.0 Litre was a bored out 3.5 which has been rated as as one of the better engine out there.
     
    Post Reply
    +2
    Bad stuff?

  3. I have the 11 Tacoma with the 2.7 ltr 4 cyl., auto, prerunner access cab sr5. Well built and reliable is how I rate it after 17,000 miles with fuel mileage at 20-21 mpg every tank. I prefer the look of the Tacoma over the Nissan and I'm sure either one would be a better choice over the Colorado/Canyon sisters.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  4. Check the prices for used units and you will find that the Tacoma holds its value much better than the Frontier and I think it is put together better than the Frontier.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

Advertisement
Get great deals on the 2013 Nissan Frontier!
By clicking above, you agree that your data will be subject to our Car Quotes Privacy Policy
Advertisement
Advertisement

 
© 2013 The Car Connection. All Rights Reserved. The Car Connection is published by High Gear Media. Stock photography by Homestar, LLC. Send us feedback.