Advertisement
Find a Car
Go!

2013 Ford Taurus: First Drive Page 2

Follow Bengt

The 3.5-liter in SE, SEL, and Limited models makes 288 horsepower and 254 pound-feet, and it adds Ford's Ti-VCT (variable camshaft timing) to increase fuel efficiency and help it be more responsive across the rev range. The changes work exactly as advertised; it's not especially strong off the line, but a very sharp throttle calibration and a rather low first gear makes it feel so; the engine feels especially strong in the low to mid revs, exactly where the revs are going to land in a full-throttle upshift—so the Taurus feels quick.

The SHO again gets a 365-horsepower, 3.5-liter V-6, with turbocharging and direct injection, and making a fat 350 pound-feet of torque at just 1,500 rpm (all the way up to 5,000 rpm). Zero-to-60 times for the SHO will be as short as the low-five-second range—so faster than a V-8-powered Chrysler 300C but not quite as quick as an SRT8. Thanks to the wonders of turbo boost, the SHO's rocket-like thrust isn't interrupted by upshifts, and there's seemingly no let-up as you head toward triple digits.

But in the corners, don't expect the SHO, or any of these all of these AWD Taurus models, to drive like a rear-wheel-drive sport sedan; they handle like large, front-wheel-drive cars, with the system only sending power to the rear wheels when there's measurable slip and the need for more grip.

Better steering, braking—and you can feel it

The electric steering rack is now hard-mounted (to the subframe), which helps tremendously with steering feel on and just off center. Now, the system loads nicely, and as we noticed when pushing the Taurus SHO hard on tight corners on mountain roads, you do now feel just a bit of bite and feedback through the wheel. Brakes have been substantially upgraded across the line, and pedal feel is more confident.

An available SHO Performance Package ($995) includes 20-inch premium wheels with summer performance tires, performance brake pads, and special calibrations for the electric power steering system and the stability control. It also orders up a lower 3.16 axle ratio for quicker sprints.

Multi-contour seats are a segment-exclusive feature in the Taurus family this year, and we found that they allow an added measure of adjustability and support.

The Taurus SHO that we drove very enthusiastically over more than a hundred miles averaged 16.5 mpg for that distance (it's rated 17 mpg city, 25 highway), while the Taurus Limited AWD we piloted later had been averaging nearly 20 mpg over an entire day and more than 250 miles of driving.

Ford has also introduced a host of chassis measures that, combined, serve to give the Taurus a more quiet ride with less impact harshness and better isolation from road noise especially.

We'd recommend against the 20-inch wheels which, from our driving experience in a Taurus Limited, seem to negate some of these gains in ride and refinement. With them, the ride is a little more abrupt, with more impact harshness, but they bring no noticeable improvement in handling.

MyFord Touch—the improved one

There's one more very important upgrade in the 2013 Ford Taurus: MyFord Touch, along with a software upgrade that, Ford says, cures a number of hiccups and user issues. Ford says that responsiveness was improved with the update, but we still found the system sluggish at times, requiring a couple of presses before it would react for some tasks. We'll update you after we've had more time with the revision—and at first glance, we really like the improved font size and more intuitive on-screen buttons.

Below MyFord Touch, the center stack now moves to capacitative controls—relying on a touch of the finger rather than a real button. However the hazard switch is a real button, just under the screen.


Advertisement
 
Follow Us

 

Have an opinion?

  • Posting indicates you have read this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
  • Notify me when there are more comments
Comments (7)
  1. "20 mpg over an entire day and more than 250 miles of driving"

    Ford has no bragging rights here that's for sure. I'm beting the the 2.0 Ecoboost won't be much better because of AWD and the mass it has to hawl around. Ask those whom thought the Ecoboost Ford F150 would give them better MPG's than the 5.0 V8. In real life driving they are neck and neck in the MPG dept.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  2. Absolutely ridiculous Ford of North America foists that hideous lump of dung on us while the Australians have their sensational Falcon.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  3. Again, wide center consoles, front buckets. Why not have a front bench and a shifter on the column. All that other jazz just wastes space. My wife's 2012 Charger is roomier and better looking. Also, wish it had a bench/column shift option.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

     
  4. ask yourself this.. how can someone be protected by setting in the center of the front bench seat? in a age of technology, where would you put your Ipod/Cell phone with no Center storage unit? How would you ajust your seat configuration without disrupting your front passengers seating position with a Benchseat?


    Anyway this car just look terible... Wheels look sooooo small for the car
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  5. You guys are all haters. This car is great. Sure it needs a few things like better colors for the interior and really nice chrome wheels for the SHO, and more room for a car that has it, but is not using it, but this car is awesome. The SHO I have gets near 29 mpg with 365 hp and AWD. The technology is great and it looks great. Looks like its on steroids. Need more colors to choose from than the current colors on the exterior. Where is Royal blue or dark blue with dark browns and beiges and tans in the interior? I drove a Limited for a rental before I bought the SHO and it was silver with tan and beige interior, which did not match for me, and ALL the interiors come with a grey dashboard. What? Need more dark brown dashes. B+
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  6. Considering that is only rated at 17 city and 25 hwy, 20 isn't too bad for something that is over 2 tons. I liked the open and roomy cabin on the 500 and have always felt claustrophobic in the Taurus. Ford squandered a lot of room in the redesign.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  7. This review really hits the mark for me. I've been attracted enough to go into Ford showrooms when I've purchased new cars twice in the past 4 years. But I've walked away from Ford dealers twice solely because of legroom (once each time for Taurus, Fusion). I'm no giant: I weigh 180lbs, 6 feet tall, not unlike many others. I find great leg room in Hyundai, BMW, Mercedes. But in Ford, Honda,etc., it's atrocious. These designs are so successfully focused on the front grille and the instrument stack, yet fail cuz the cars feel like sardine cans. I wish it had an option to increase legroom, which matters much more to me than MyFord Touch. Tech bling rapidly ages into so yesterday; solid build, fit & finish, and comfort gets my $$$'s.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

 

Have an opinion? Join the conversation!

Advertisement
Try My Showroom
Save cars, write notes, and comparison shop with hi-res photos.
Add your first car
Advertisement
Take Us With You!
   
Related Used Listings
Browse used listings in your area
Advertisement

More From High Gear Media


 
 
© 2014 The Car Connection. All Rights Reserved. The Car Connection is published by High Gear Media. Stock photography by Homestar, LLC. Send us feedback.