If you're considering one of the so-called compact crossover models like the Hyundai Tucson or Nissan Rogue, which make great sedan alternatives and good picks for smaller families, chances are you'll find the array of market choices overwhelming.
Both of these models compete against the Ford Escape, Subaru Forester, Honda CR-V, Mazda CX-5, and Toyota RAV4, as well as the Kia Sportage, which is closely related to the Tucson.
MORE: Read our reviews of the 2017 Hyundai Tucson and the 2017 Nissan Rogue
The Nissan Rogue was last given a full redesign for the 2014 model year, while the Hyundai Tucson was all-new last year. And in their latest iterations, these two models have headed in quite different directions—with the Tucson gaining more upscale styling and a more elegant look and feel in general, while the Rogue focuses just a little more on fitting the most passenger space.
We've scored the Tucson a 7.5 out of 10 on our new ratings scale, while the Rogue suffers from a lower than average safety score. (Read more about how we rate cars.)
While the Tucson is only offered in five-passenger form, the Rogue is available with a third-row seat—for an official capacity of up to seven passengers. Don't get too excited about the Rogue as a true three-row vehicle, because that third row is sized only for kids, in a pinch, but it's a competitive advantage that frazzled parents might appreciate.
Backing up a bit, however, the Tucson has plenty of advantages; and one of those is styling. The look of the new Tucson is definitely premium inside and out, and it makes the previous model—as well as the Rogue, to some degree—look a little too economy-car influenced. There's an elegant simplicity to the Tucson's interior in particular, with top Limited models offering plush leather upholstery; but in the Tucson's well-sculpted sheetmetal it emulates the look of much more expensive vehicles. Focusing over to the Rogue, its profile is definitely a little more homely, and its details more like those of frugal small cars. It's a conservative look, although some might like the smoother (rather than creased) sheetmetal and low, somewhat more carlike dash layout.
Although styling differences between the two might come down to personal tastes, there's a clear winner for performance, and that's the Tucson. The Rogue loses here, by a long shot, due to drivability issues with its continuously variable automatic transmission (CVT), which offers decent acceleration but fails to respond quickly enough for quick bursts of power for passing or gaps in traffic. The engine is also far too present in terms of cabin noise. There's a new hybrid model that raises fuel economy and doesn't change drivability much.
By comparison, the base Hyundai Tucson SE comes with a 164-horsepower, 2.0-liter four-cylinder engine and six-speed automatic transmission—a combination that offers good drivability and refinement that's a cut above. Tucson Eco, Sport, and Limited models step up to a 1.6-liter turbo engine and dual-clutch automatic, but that's actually a step behind in drivability.
Base Tucsons get a 2.0-liter inline-4 with 164 horsepower. Coupled to a 6-speed automatic, this version is rated at 23 mpg city, 30 highway, 26 combined with front-wheel drive. All-wheel drive trims fuel economy to 21/26/23 mpg.
Other versions of the 2017 Tucson come with a turbocharged 1.6-liter inline-4 with 175 hp, coupled to a 7-speed dual-clutch transmission. Sport and Limited versions are rated at 25/30/27 mpg, while the Eco is rated for 26/33/29 mpg. Hyundai attributes most of the difference between those trim levels to wheel and tire sizes.
All-wheel-drive versions of the turbo engine manage 24/28/26 mpg or 25/31/27 mpg in regular and Eco versions, respectively.
Both of these models are tuned for comfort, not edgy handling and fast driving—although they handle well enough for daily-driving tasks. The latest Tucson has improved tremendously in this area, and while the ride is soft and quiet, the steering is now reasonably communicative. Rogue models, on the other hand, have an even softer ride, yet the steering is a little less engaging and there's more road noise entering the cabin.
Both the Rogue and Tucson slot in at the truly compact end of the crossover spectrum. The Nissan fares a bit better with its well-packaged interior and ideal driving position, as well as the new itty-bitty third-row seat. Hyundai has improved the Tucson's seats somewhat, but they still need longer bottom cushions to be truly comfortable. In each of these utes, the cargo area is large enough for a few weekend bags, but you'll want to think twice about bringing along pets, as the upswept styling of both vehicles blocks out rear visibility for pets and drivers alike.
The Rogue used to have the upper hand on safety, but the Tucson has jumped ahead since its recent redesign. The Hyundai has already earned IIHS Top Safety Pick+ status, although it hasn't yet been rated in federal NCAP tests. The Rogue earns four stars in NCAP testing and doesn't manage as high of a rating from the IIHS. A rearview camera is now standard on both models, but it's fair to say that the Tucson's available active-safety kit is a step ahead—especially with automatic emergency braking available.
In features, both of these models pack a lot in for the money; although the Tucson has a slight edge here, too. Equipment is rather basic for the entry versions of both, yet moving up both model lines there are plenty of technology and active-safety upgrades. The top Tucson Limited offers several features—ventilated front seats and heated outboard rear seats are a few—that you won't find in a comparably priced Rogue SL.
Neither the Rogue nor the Tucson will win over race rats with straight-line numbers or g-force figures. While the Rogue might have the advantage to you because of its third row, we think a lot of shoppers will agree that the latest Tucson and its more upscale look and smoother moves will rank a step ahead.