Advertisement
Find a Car
Go!

Toyota Camry Vs. Honda Accord: Compare Cars Page 2

Follow Bengt

The Camry still wins for fuel economy—for now, that is, if you consider that the Camry Hybrid is widely available and has excellent gas-mileage ratings of 43 mpg city, 39 highway. But if you're weighing the mainstream models against each other, the Accord emerges as the more frugal. Honda won't have a Hybrid model until the 2014 model year, when it will also introduce a Plug-In Hybrid model. In the meantime, looking at the rest of the lineup, the Accord earns an excellent 27/36 mpg with its new direct-injection four-cylinder and continuously variable automatic transmission (CVT), while the four-cylinder Camry gets 25/35 at best. V-6 Accords are especially smart and efficient, with ratings of 21/34, while Camry V-6 models stand at 21/30.

If you need to settle what could at this point be close to a tie for some, it's worthwhile to take a longer look at the styling and performance of these two cars. Don't count on either of these models to add excitement or sex appeal. With the Camry's current design purely evolutionary, and Honda proudly touting that it designed the Accord from the inside out, these aren't models designed to catch your eye from a distance. In fact, they're both very likely to blend in with

For 2012, the Toyota Camry was completely redesigned—although the changes were so subtle and evolutionary you might not have even noticed. The 2013 redesign given to the Accord is roughly in the same league—although the Accord does look a slightly more exciting and better proportioned on the outside, with more of a premium look inside. Of course, on the outside, especially, both of these models have been upstaged by the Hyundai Sonata, as well as the daring new Ford Fusion.


As far as performance goes, these are two of the only remaining mid-size models to offer an available V-6, and in both cases it's a smooth, refined, and very strong option. In the Accord especially it gives this Honda more of an Acura feel. Both models are also very smooth with their base four-cylinder engines, and the new CVT in the Honda doesn't succumb to the undesirable drone and rubber-band feel that CVTs so often do. The Camry is downright dull to drive, although it has a more responsive feel in SE versions; on the other hand, the Accord gets the higher score here because of its well-tuned steering and crisp, light driving feel.

While the Camry doesn't lag far behind the Accord in any one way—well, except styling, perhaps—Honda has produced a more compelling design and driving experience that still hits all the marks for practicality, comfort, and features.

 

2013 Toyota Camry 2013 Honda Accord Sedan
2013 Toyota Camry 2013 Honda Accord Sedan 4-door V6 Auto EX-L Angular Front Exterior View
TCC Rating
7.6 The 2013 Toyota Camry is no standout for design, but it's more than ever the sensible pick for those who value comfort, value, and frugality above all else. 8.8 The 2013 Honda Accord is one of America's best, most sensible sedans, even if it hasn't changed radically.
Styling
6A ubiquitous shape and conservative styling make the Camry no standout, but up close it's crisper, neater, and a little more upscale. Read more8The design of the 2013 Honda Accord maximizes interior space, yet it's classy and well-proportioned. Read more
Performance
7The 2013 Toyota Camry won't delight driving enthusiasts, but it handles well enough and accelerates responsively. Read more8A set of new efficiency-minded powertrains proves refined and responsive in the Accord, while handling is crisp and confident. Read more
Quality
9The 2013 Camry is quiet, spacious, and smooth-riding—and the SE is worth the upgrade for its better-bolstered seats. Read more9The 2013 Honda Accord models have cabin appointments that go beyond what typical, budget-minded mid-size buyers might expect. Read more
Safety
8There are more airbags than most cars in this class, and great crash-test results--although at least one 'poor' results keeps it from being a true top pick. Read more10The 2013 Accord has better crash-test ratings than any other affordable mid-size sedan, as well as a robust list of available active-safety features and a new, stronger structure. Read more
Features
8Upper trims of the Camry, like the XLE and SE offer long lists of features, while the base models offer lots of value for the money. Read more9Honda piles on the useful features, even in LX and EX trims, while the EX-L and Touring models get the traditional luxury treatment. Read more
Green
9V-6 versions of the 2013 Camry are no standout, while four-cylinder models are quite fuel-efficient—and the 43-mpg Camry Hybrid might as well be an honorary Prius. Read more7Thanks to a new CVT and direct injection, the 2013 Accord four-cylinder gets up to 36 mpg--but the V-6's 34 mpg highway is even more impressive. Read more
MSRP
from $22,235 from $21,680
Invoice
from $20,345 from $19,849
Fuel Economy - Combined City and Highway
28 28
Front Leg Room (in)
41.6 42.5
Second Leg Room (in)
38.9
Read Full Specs
38.5
Read Full Specs


 
Follow Us

 

Have an opinion?

  • Posting indicates you have read this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
  • Notify me when there are more comments
Comments (9)
  1. While both are pretty nice rides, I would vote for the Fusion. If you are talking value and features- neither of these guys have anything on the Fusion. Toyota has struggled with electronics and sudden acceleration problems while Honda is pretty boring and technologically inferior.. Ford also has the sustainability and green initiative which is far more than T or Honda.
     
    Post Reply
    -1
    Bad stuff?

     
  2. Sorry the Mexican built vehicle is not in the same ball park with either Toyota and Honda, hopefully you get a fusion built North America.
    Accord and Camry has more North American Content, than every Ford product at this time.
     
    Post Reply
    +2
    Bad stuff?

  3. If you have been Rustproofing these two vehicles for the last 25 years, you would understand why the Camry cant be match by the Accord.
    Camry build quality is just too far ahead of the Accord, and this has been that way since the 80's. Today you look at the underside of both vehicles side by side, and you will understand what I am talking about. Unfortunately
    all auto journalist only see the interior bling, and think thats what makes the vehicle. As a rustproofer for the last 25 years. Honda Products dont hold up to Toyota product, different quality construction, and materials.....
     
    Post Reply
    -2
    Bad stuff?

     
  4. Bling aside, drive accord for a couple of yrs then drive camry for a couple of yrs. Your accord may start falling apart but camry usually remains solid. Ask any car guru
     
    Post Reply
    -2
    Bad stuff?

     
  5. really? Accord will fall apart after a few years? Then why did my Camry start falling apart after year 5, but my Accord lasted me 12 years without a single incident, either engine, interior, or the aforementioned "rust"...be a fan of Toyota, but back up your arguments with facts, not personalized non-sense. It's a known fact, Toyota's are designed for engine quality on a budget, cheap interior (they admitted this), and comfortable drive, which is why old people love them. But you ask what someone who actually enjoys driving would prefer driving in either traffic, long road trips, or on any given day between these two cars, most of the votes will go to the Accord. And I have driven both so no bias.
     
    Post Reply
    +1
    Bad stuff?

  6. I will vote for the Fusion. I do not want my car look old fashion next year!
     
    Post Reply
    -2
    Bad stuff?

     
  7. Well, pickboz, Fusions and All Fords aren't exactly styling trend-setters. Ford should have taken styling cues from their once-partners MAZDA if they really wanted cutting edge styling. As for style, Ford can't even compete with GM!
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  8. Whats missing in this report is the fact that , almost everyone cant see the difference in build quality between these two vehicles. they all look at the paper report. You put these two vehicles side by side on a hoist, and start from front to back. You will see why Honda cant compete with Toyota. simple reason is Honda do not have the money to do what Toyota do in there research and development. One of the reasons I dont go to car shows anymore. I dont get caught up in the smoke and mirror, bling, around cars too long.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

     
  9. I'm sorry, but you sound like an absolute Toyota fanboy...here are the facts...Honda is the #1 manufacturer of motors in the world...Toyota is #1 as far as sales # (which are inflated due to fleet/rental car sales), however, interior quality should match exterior quality. I've owned everything from Toyota, Nissan, Honda, Ford, and even Hyundai...Toyota is severely lacking in the handling department, and I would seriously pick a Hyundai over them. With that being said, there's a reason why non-corporate sales figures favor the Accord for performance, driveability, comfort, and quality. That's the facts, not opinion
     
    Post Reply
    +1
    Bad stuff?

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

Advertisement
Get great deals on the 2013 Toyota Camry!
By clicking above, you agree that your data will be subject to our Car Quotes Privacy Policy
Advertisement
Take Us With You!
Advertisement

More From High Gear Media


 
 
© 2013 The Car Connection. All Rights Reserved. The Car Connection is published by High Gear Media. Stock photography by Homestar, LLC. Send us feedback.