2016 Honda Accord SedanEnlarge Photo
While Honda's Accord and Toyota's Camry have never been all that stylish, the two rivals always have been smart and sensible. The Camry and Accord hit their stride in the 1980s, when they became the epitome of the American mid-size sedan. Since then, both have evolved to keep pace with excellent new family sedans from Ford and Subaru.
Still, styling is a good place to begin to compare them. When the current car was introduced in 2012, the Camry wore a purely evolutionary look--in other words, boring. This year, every metal panel except the roof is new; The front end is striking, it wears LED front running lamps, and the side view is more sweeping. Inside, the inexpensive, cobbled-together look has been erased, with a more handsome look given to the dash and a higher grade of trim. The Accord still looks slightly more exciting and better proportioned on the outside, with more of a premium look inside. Of course, both of these models have been upstaged by vehicles like the Kia Optima and the daring Ford Fusion.
The Camry is downright dull to drive, although it has a more responsive feel in SE versions; on the other hand, the Accord gets the higher score here because of its well-tuned steering and crisp, light driving feel. Both models are very smooth with their base four-cylinder engines, and the new CVT in the Honda doesn't succumb to the undesirable drone and rubber-band feel that CVTs so often do. These are two of the only remaining mid-size models to offer an available V-6, and in both cases it's a smooth, refined, and very strong option. In the Accord especially it gives this Honda more of an Acura feel.
Each also offers a hybrid edition--and with the Honda, there's even an Accord Plug-In Hybrid. At 50 mpg city, 45 highway, it beats the Camry Hybrid's numbers (43/39 mpg) by a long shot, and based on our drives, it has very smooth hybrid integration. Across the rest of the lineup, the Accord outpoints the base Camry (27/36 mpg to 25/35 mpg), and the upscale edition (21/34 mpg, versus 21/30 mpg).
The Accord is the winner in comfort and space, too. The Camry's base front seats are rather flat; SE seats are better. The latest Accord has more support, and most drivers will prefer the Accord EX's trim and materials to those in the Camry LE. In back, both cars have rooflines that preserve headroom; carrying adults in the back seat is fuss-free. With its rather low beltline and a little more side glass, the Accord offers a slightly better view outward for those in back—possibly eliminating the need for Dramamine.
Toyota and Honda have paid more attention to refinement this time around and added extra noise insulation, but thanks to standard Active Noise Control and Active Sound Control on the Honda Accord—which especially help cancel out road noise—the Accord is the clear winner here, too. For ride quality, the Camry is the softer of the two in most of its trims, although the Accord's firmer calibration brings crisper handling response.
We used to consider both of these models to be near equals for safety, as they both have earned 'good' ratings in all the traditional frontal, side, and roof strength categories from the IIHS. But in a group of sedans tested by the IIHS in its new small-overlap frontal test, the Accord was one of a small group to achieve a 'good' rating, while the Camry achieved an 'acceptable' score. The Camry also missed top federal ratings; although it gets a five-star overall rating, its four-star frontal results add up to a vehicle that's not quite in the same echelon as the Honda Accord or Subaru Legacy.
Each of these sedans offers some of the latest accident-avoidance technology, as standard equipment or as an option, in the form of adaptive cruise control, lane-departure and forward-collision warnings. Honda's LaneWatch camera is a nifty touch: it shows the curbside view to the right when the turn signal clicks that way. The Camry offers a more conventional, and we think preferable, blind-spot monitor as well as a rearview camera. On either car, those features are options or bundled into the priciest models, though.
The market has evolved to expect connectivity features even in lower-priced vehicles, and both of these models cater to that expectation, with standard Bluetooth hands-free calling, Bluetooth audio streaming, and a USB port. But Honda has gone well beyond that, also including SMS text capability, Pandora audio streaming, dual-zone climate control, and an eight-inch i-MID display. Provided you're looking at one of the more affordable trims, we think Honda is the winner here, too—but only slightly.
While the Camry doesn't lag far behind the Accord in any one way—well, except styling, perhaps—Honda has produced a more compelling design and driving experience that still hits all the marks for practicality, comfort, and features.
|from $22,970||from N/A|
|from $21,017||from N/A|
|Fuel Economy - Combined City and Highway|
|Front Leg Room (in)|
|Second Leg Room (in)|
|Read Full Specs|