Advertisement
Find a Car
Go!

Honda Civic Will Get A Speedy Facelift After Bad Reviews

Follow Richard

Over its nearly 40-year run, the Honda Civic has become synonymous with reliability, affordability, and value. In fact, the Civic is so ubiquitous on American streets that it's become nearly invisible.

Then the 2012 Civic rolled out, and people started to notice -- but not in the good way. Today, Honda says it's working to address the 2012 Civic's critics with a makeover, and according to a report in Automotive News, it could come a full year ahead of schedule.

THE PROBLEM

The Honda Civic has never been the most fashion-forward car on the lots, but then again, it hasn't needed to be. The Civic has staked its reputation on conservative, functional design and respectable performance that nearly everyone can afford. And of course, it's benefited from the Honda name, which means "durability" to many shoppers. As a result, it's become the leading compact model in retail sales.

When Honda began planning the 2012 Civic back in 2009, the world's economies were in free-fall -- and this is where the problems began. Honda's CEO, Takanobu Ito, was unable to see past the financial climate of the day, and he brought the Civic's redesign to a screeching halt. The new model's wheelbase got shortened, and its feature set diminished to keep the sticker price down for cost-conscious consumers.

Today, the world's economies are wobbling back toward normalcy. Though family finances aren't what they should be, people are still buying cars, and they want bang for their buck. So when the 2012 Civic rolled out in April, with its bland styling and cheap, plastic dashboard, few people were impressed.

Critics panned the 2012 Civic, with the Wall Street Journal going so far as to call it "a betrayal". (We awarded it a pretty lousy 6.8 out of 10.) Customers gave it a spin, but demand quickly tapered off once they'd sat in it. Poorly written advertising didn't help.

Moral #1: Few people want to drive a cheap-feeling car.

Moral #2: Have an English teacher give your nationwide ad campaign the once-over.

THE SOLUTION

The bad press surrounding the 2012 Civic isn't going unnoticed at Honda HQ. In fact, John Mendel, executive vice president for American Honda, said that the company has heard the Civic's critics and is looking for ways to address their concerns. He went on to say that while the current Civic wouldn't ordinarily see a facelift before 2014, the process has been fast-tracked, and the refreshed model could appear on lots as soon as early 2013.

How Honda will pull that off in such a relatively short timeframe remains to be seen. The company has been working hard to recover from the Tohoku earthquake and tsunami that severely disrupted its activities in Japan back in March and delayed the rollout of the 2012 Civic. Now Honda has shuttered facilities in Thailand due to the country's massive floods, and they may not open again for six months. Combined with the slow recovery of some auto markets, these facts may explain why Honda's shares have slipped 22% since August and why the company has scrapped its current financial forecasts.

SIDE NOTE

It's interesting to compare Honda's response to criticism of the 2012 Civic with its response to attacks on the 2010 Honda Accord Crosstour. When the latter debuted on Facebook in September 2009, Honda fans were outraged, calling it one of the ugliest cars they'd seen. Honda said it was "listening", but its responses didn't prove it. Honda reps tried to explain the new model by saying that the pics on Facebook didn't do it justice, and in the end, the Crosstour isn't for everyone. So there.

Two years later, Honda's tone is decidedly different, and customers should see results. What caused the change? Did Honda finally realize the power of the web and social media? Or is the company taking criticism of the Civic more seriously because it's Honda's bread and butter? Only Ito and his team know for sure, but we'd be surprised if it weren't a little of both.

Advertisement
 
Follow Us

 

Have an opinion?

  • Posting indicates you have read this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
  • Notify me when there are more comments
Comments (9)
  1. We still don't have the new Civic in Australia yet.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

     
  2. I think the new Civic is only for the USA market. that was one of the negative reviews because people are accusing Honda of going the same route as the American car makers used to, the whole bigger is better thing. In fact, this model civic is bigger than some older model Accords!
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  3. Proving once again... there's never enough time to do it right, but always enough time to do it over!
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  4. Ok I understand fast tracking the facelift and refreshing car to address complaints, but how completely idiotic is Honda to tell people that they're doing it NOW when the current car just came out? They're basically shooting themselves in the foot with the current model and going to kill sales on a car that's already having a hard time finding success and praise.

    If Honda's PR had half a brain they'd keep quiet until late 2012 and then leak out the "possibility" of an early refresh. This just reaffirms my belief that Honda is now run by a bunch of complete morons who don't even understand how businesses work.

    There's NO way that these guys running Honda today are the same people who kicked ass in the 80's & 90's. Buncha bean counters now
     
    Post Reply
    +1
    Bad stuff?

     
  5. As the owner of a 2012 EX Coupe I bought in July (a bare week before the Consumer Reports review came out), I'm not happy with Honda at all.
     
    Post Reply
    +1
    Bad stuff?

     
  6. Just curious did somebody have a gun to your head when you bought it? Did you test drive it? Sorry but to get mad over some reviews is silly. Did you like the car before the consumer reports came out? I mean if you're buying a civic to be cool I can understand your concern but you bought the car, obviously you must have liked it. What changed between now and then? I own the car too, the Si model, and I love it. The 8th gen has its pros/cons and so does this model imo. Anyways just wondering why you would buy the car if you're so hung up on consumer reports, I'd imagine you'd wait for them before buying and if that isn't the reason why did you buy the car?
     
    Post Reply
    +1
    Bad stuff?

  7. Kevin Lee,

    Your forthrightness, honesty and accuracy are all appreciated. And if you own a business or work for someone who sells a product or markets a service, please remind me not to be dumb enough to spend money there.

    I know one is born every minute according to PT Barnum, but I prefer not to be intentionally corralled into being one if I can avoid it. Information is the currency of the day, and using it to practice the mushroom theory on me will not make me a happy or repeat customer.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  8. This article should be titled "Honda Does Damage Control On Another Model" :-)
     
    Post Reply
    +1
    Bad stuff?

  9. It took me a while to love the 8th generation, but when I loved it, I loved it for good! The futurist image is a great hit and a smart move from Honda. When the 9th generation came out, I was very disappointed with the form. But I must say that if the 8th generation was a good car to drive, the 9th is a triumph in engineering. I don't own either cars but I rent them a lot.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

 

Have an opinion? Join the conversation!

Advertisement
Advertisement
Try My Showroom
Save cars, write notes, and comparison shop with hi-res photos.
Add your first car
Take Us With You!
   
Related Used Listings
Browse used listings in your area
Advertisement

 
© 2014 The Car Connection. All Rights Reserved. The Car Connection is published by High Gear Media. Stock photography by izmo, Inc. Send us feedback.
Advertisement