Advertisement
Find a Car
Go!

Chevrolet Impala Owners File Class-Action Lawsuit


2007 Chevrolet Impala

2007 Chevrolet Impala

In what’s sure to be a nightmare for the GM legal team, a class-action suit has been filed against General Motors involving 2007-2008 Chevrolet Impalas. The suit complains that GM knew about and fixed “rear-end problems” on Impala police versions for those model years, but not for those owned by about 400,000 other drivers.

While it’s much too early to have any clear picture of how this all will turn out, the news is no doubt not going to sit well with anyone who owns one of those model year Impalas.

The suit, as reported in The Detroit News, was brought on behalf of a Pennsylvania woman who wants GM to replace “potentially faulty” rear suspension rods. The Impala owner had purchased her Impala new in 2008 and within 6,000 miles had to have the tires replaced. She said that the GM dealer also did an alignment on the car, but never disclosed the spindle issue.

The suit references a GM service bulletin issued in July 2008 for police versions of the Impala only which instructed GM dealers to replace the rods, align the wheels and replace the rear tires, if necessary. Any police agencies that had already replaced the tires could seek reimbursement for up to a year.

But the story got worse for the Pennsylvania woman. In November 2010, she had to have yet another set of replacement tires, even though her Impala had less than 25,000 miles on the odometer.

There have been various owner complaints filed with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) about the issue, but the NHTSA has never opened a formal investigation into Chevrolet Impala for either the 2007 or 2008 model year.

What should you do if you own one of these vehicles? Depending on whether you’ve burned through an inordinate amount of rear tires in a much-sooner-than-should-be-expected time period, you may wish to look into this class-action suit.

[Detroit News]

_____________________________________________________

Sign up for our free newsletter or follow us on Facebook or Twitter.

Advertisement
 
Follow Us

 

Have an opinion?

  • Posting indicates you have read this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
  • Notify me when there are more comments
Comments (2)
  1. Chevy serviced car never said a word about dangerously warn tires. The rear almost blew on the way to Fla. 17,000 mi. Bought more in Fla.
     
    Post Reply
    +1
    Bad stuff?

  2. Already went through one set of tires;the dealership found problems with rear end, and had to pay repair out of MY pocket. Also had rust removed trunk area dealership paid for repair,but wow a brand new car 2008 rusting already! It just keeps getting better ;I parked the car got out ran inside to pay a bill , then got back into my car went to put into reverse and the shift lever would not into gear .Had to call a tow truck out of pocket to take to dealership to leave there overnight to find out it was nothing more than a broken wire, that I had to pay for again out of pocket. This is b.s. I feel I've bought a lemon ; just what I need now that I'm unemployed!!!!!
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

 

Have an opinion? Join the conversation!

Advertisement
Advertisement
Try My Showroom
Save cars, write notes, and comparison shop with hi-res photos.
Add your first car
Take Us With You!
   
Related Used Listings
Browse used listings in your area
Advertisement

 
© 2014 The Car Connection. All Rights Reserved. The Car Connection is published by High Gear Media. Stock photography by izmo, Inc. Send us feedback.
Advertisement