By
John Voelcker
John Voelcker
Senior Editor
BIO
John is Senior Editor for High Gear Media. In addition to news coverage and new car reviews, John creates and oversees all editorial for High Gear's...
More
LATEST ARTICLE
Chevy Volt Vs. Nissan Leaf: Compare Cars
They both deliver smooth, all-electric power. They both plug into the wall to recharge their...
Read More
- #4LEADERBOARD RANK
- 2905ARTICLES CONTRIBUTED
- 1958COMMENTS POSTED
By this point, the Honda Civic compact is an American institution.
The newest generation, all new for 2012, builds on the car's traditional strengths--sporty roadholding, good gas mileage--but faces increasingly stringent competition from new entries like the 2011 Hyundai Elantra.
The 2012 Honda Civic line comprises a four-door sedan with a 1.8-liter gasoline engine, the Civic Si two-door coupe (the hot rod of the line), and three high-gas-mileage models: the Civic Hybrid, the Civic HF model, and the Civic Natural Gas.
In styling, the 2012 Civic is evolutionary rather than radically redesigned. Its front and side profile are instantly recognizable as Honda Civic, though the rear end is new enough that it doesn't instantly read "Civic" unless you see the rest of the car.

2012 Honda Civic launch, New York Auto Show, April 2011
Enlarge Photo
The 2012 Civic's footprint is similar to the previous model, though the new model was adjusted halfway through its design cycle to take a few more inches off its length.
As always, the Civic's strength is its handling. It's still probably the most enjoyable of all compact entries to drive, though other entries are starting to catch up.
The gasoline model's acceleration--we drove a 2012 Civic EX four-door sedan--is lively, but the flat, confident roadholding always positions the car where the driver wants it.
Handling is even tighter and flatter in the Civic Si performance model, but at the cost of significant interior noise under virtually all circumstances.

2012 Honda Civic launch, New York Auto Show, April 2011
Enlarge Photo
The Si's new 2.4-liter engine produces its maximum torque roughly at engine speeds roughly 1,000 rpm lower than its predecessor, but as always, you still have to spin the engine toward its 7000-rpm redline to get the power. Novice Si drivers may find themselves one gear too high for useful acceleration under many different circumstances.
The sedan, which is offered with a five-speed manual transmission or five-speed automatic, is projected to return 39 mpg on the EPA highway cycle. That's close to the 40-mpg Holy Grail for highway mileage, and a 3-mpg improvement on the old Civic.
For maximum gas mileage, though, there's the Civic Hybrid model, now in its third generation. Its EPA ratings are projected to be 44 mpg on both city and highway cycles, and for 2012, it provides more boost from a larger 15-kilowatt (20-hp) electric motor.
It's worth noting that the 2012 Honda Civic Hybrid uses Honda's first-ever lithium-ion battery pack, which takes up relatively little room in the trunk and weighs far less than the older nickel-metal-hydride battery in its predecessor.

2012 Honda Civic launch, New York Auto Show, April 2011
Enlarge Photo
The pre-production hybrid model we drove could still have used a little work to iron out a few rough spots in the integration of regenerative and friction braking. We experienced some stumbles and irregular brake feel switching from acceleration to braking and back.
It does, however, offer the ability to run in electric-only mode under limited circumstances. We saw electric running at speeds as high as 36 mph, but only for very short periods. That's still an improvement on the old Civic Hybrid model, however.
Have an opinion?
almprin06 Posted: 4/20/2011 7:34am PDT
Also, the new Civic is still too low to provide easy ingress\egress for those who are not vertically-challenged. Honda missed the opportunity to add a few inches of roof height to accommodate grown adults seeking an economical sedan.
Regardless, enough shoppers will be pleased with the fuel-economy improvements and Honda's longstanding bullet-proof reliability.
Jennifer Posted: 4/20/2011 8:36am PDT
Jon Posted: 4/20/2011 10:13am PDT
SStachowiak Posted: 4/20/2011 10:18am PDT
dagr382 Posted: 4/20/2011 10:27am PDT
greg Posted: 4/20/2011 11:27am PDT
Matt Posted: 4/20/2011 12:52pm PDT
Mark Behr Posted: 4/20/2011 6:11pm PDT
Jethro Posted: 4/23/2011 10:57am PDT
asdf Posted: 4/23/2011 10:01pm PDT
carguy Posted: 4/26/2011 12:24am PDT
Scuromondo Posted: 4/29/2011 11:48am PDT
But then I compared the hp/torque curves of the two engines: From idle to 6000 rpm, the 2.4L is clearly the winner with gobs more torque and hp. But from 6000 to 7000 rpm, the 2.4L's torque & hp drop so sharply that the performance of both engines looks almost identical. Then from 7000 to 8000 rpm, the old 2.0L's hp continues to peak while the 2.4L is already in the next gear. ...Now I'm not so sure which will be the faster car!
Have an opinion?Join the conversation!