Advertisement
Find a Car
Go!

Looking for the 2012 Ford Ranger? It's the 2011 Ford F-150 Page 2

Follow Marty

2011 Ford F-150

Big is the new small

It's not an exact fit, but along with those smaller vehicles, Ford will use the new V-6 version of the F-150 as a figurative Ranger replacement. The new 3.7-liter V-6 (the one you'll also find in the 2011 Ford Mustang) thoroughly outscores the Ranger's V-6, with fuel economy estimated at better than 15/20 mpg and 300 horsepower on tap, compared to the Ranger's best showings of 15/20 mpg and 207 hp. A V-6 Ranger XLT costs just over $19,000--while a base 2010 F-150 runs just $22,060, though it's missing some power features the smaller V-6 Ranger XLT offers as standard.

The new F-150, in fact, makes perfect sense to most compact truck buyers except for a few user cases: the four-cylinder diehards who'd otherwise buy a used truck, the truck-agnostic types who might just as soon buy a compact coupe as a style statement; or worst of all for Ford's accounting department, the fleet buyers who opt only for the low-to-no profit base Ranger with the four-cylinder, the five-speed manual, the regular cab and almost no options. That's the classic "bug truck" you see at auction, where it's often recirculated through the new-car industry's lower digestive tract, otherwise known as the auction.   

Truck buyers who still want four-cylinder pickups are still in luck, sort of. The Toyota Tacoma and Nissan Frontier still offer four-cylinders, at a base price of about $15,500 and $17,500, respectively. But those who really want compact-truck size and park-ability are out of luck. Of all the automakers to show concept compact pickups--remember the Dodge M-80 and the Toyota A-Bat?--none have pulled the trigger and committed to build new unibody-based trucklets. If a business case unfolds for a true compact pickup, Ford needs only to look at its swelling fleet of small cars--Focus, Fiesta, C-Max, Escape and Transit Connect--for a flexible architecture that could add a truck derivative.

Instead of a 2012 Ford Ranger, truck drivers get an F-150 instead--and Ford gets a year to explain how sometimes bigger is better, even if it's less well-equipped.


Advertisement
 
Follow Us

 

Have an opinion?

  • Posting indicates you have read this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
  • Notify me when there are more comments
Comments (14)
  1. It's a mistake to let the Ranger name die. Instead, use the new Focus or C-Masx or whatever platform (whichever fits better) and develop a thoroughly modern front-wheel drive Ranger with the newer 4-cylinder, and a turbo option that appeals to the young crowd, with all the Sync and high-tech toys the under 30 crowd want. It would be a HUGE hit. Offer an all-wheel drive version eventually - maybe with a V6 or just keep the turbo-4 as the top of the line version. So what if it costs as much as a base F-150, it would draw a different buyer profile entirely. The fact that no one else is willing to do it is reason to do it - be a LEADER, not a follower Ford!
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  2. If the auto companies spent half as much of their standard pickup advertising on compact pickups, sales would probably be several times higher than now. When is the last time anyone saw a TV ad for a Ranger or Dakota?
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  3. If you're gonna kill the Ranger, at least give us a last shot at a decent one, say a 3.7 litre version to close it out?
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  4. How about dropping a pickup bed onto the Transit Connect?
     
    Post Reply
    +1
    Bad stuff?

  5. Ford may not make alot of money on the sales side but they make a ton of money on the parts and service side.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  6. I think this Kuzak guy drew numbers out of a hat and made his own decision on how he feels. #1 reason you dont sell many Rangers is you dont market the Ranger hardly at all. Imagine what would happen if you marketed Rangers like Steve Jobs does with Ipads and Iphones, imagine what would happen if you actually updated it some. Ford some do not have garages to fit a F150 in, Ranger is the right size truck. Perhaps you should think again Kuzak and Fields!
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  7. Whoever decided to kill the Ranger should be given their walking papers. Rangers don't sell now because they are horribly outdated, particularly the powertrains and suspension. Due to this they don't even bother to market them. I don't know how an F150 with a small engine is a Ranger replacement? It's oversized and underpowered. I would rather have a smaller vehicle I can park downtown and in my garage, and I need the utility of a 4x4 truck. Ford does not have anything else in their lineup that will fit the bill. Looks like it is going to be Tacoma for me. :(
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  8. Never thought about even tring to garage my F150 but hey Ford listen up.. I have 2 car garage and a baby on the way.... My F150 is paid for and not fitting my needs.. a smaller 4 door pickup with a 5.5 bed would fill my needs, that fits into the garage.. Diesel backed up with a stick.. seats 5 in a pinch... sounds great to me.. hope VW is listining.. Toyota and Nissan seem to have over looked the market too.. Some one needs to put a nice small truck out there and see what happens.. with some marketing and gas mileage. Be fun to see what happens
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  9. Really dumb move on Ford's part to drop the Ranger. The F-150 is NOT and never will be considered by most Ranger buyers. Too big. Too much. Too thirsty.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  10. I agree that its nothing less then a mistake by ford. They have issues pushing the "bigger is better" idea. I use my trusty Ranger in the bush, where a bigger truck could not even dream of going. I dont know where they are doing their research, but I know lots of Ranger owners that would kill for the European diesel and crew cab option. Sad to say, from how its looking, my next truck will be a Frontier.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  11. I will never ever by a full size truck in my life. They are way too big. Ford if you want the truck to sell. Bring the new Australian F-100 to North America, give us that new 3.7Lv6, make a turbocharged 4 cyl gas and 4 cyl turbo diesel. Then it will sell.
    I just hope Nissan and Toyota won't kill their small trucks like Ford and GM are doing.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  12. After 40 years of customer loyalty, Ford is telling me that they no longer need my business. I have had six Rangers and a Sport Trac over the years and now they think that they can make me buy a F-150. WRONG! Thanks for nothing, Ford.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  13. The mid-sized truck market is the most overlooked and neglected segment of consumers. Maybe $4.00 per gallon gasoline will cause some manufactureres to rethink their big-is-best strategy. I would jump on a Ranger like this... 4X4...diesel... 6 speed... here's betting someone will recognize the demand in the USA
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  14. So the Ranger will be sold in about 180 countries just not Canada or the U.S. Countries like Belize, Congo, Madagascar, Syria, Egypt, Chad, Chili, Belarus, all foreign countries to where Ford started and we can't get no Ranger here. I think somebody at Ford should have a real long look in the mirror> I'm sure Henry is rolling in his grave over this dumbest of asses decision. F..k I hate Ford now.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

 

Have an opinion? Join the conversation!

Advertisement
Advertisement
Try My Showroom
Save cars, write notes, and comparison shop with hi-res photos.
Add your first car
Take Us With You!
   
Related Used Listings
Browse used listings in your area
Advertisement

 
© 2014 The Car Connection. All Rights Reserved. The Car Connection is published by High Gear Media. Stock photography by izmo, Inc. Send us feedback.