Find a Car

Are State Safety Inspections Of Vehicles Needed?

Vehicle Safety inspections are in the news as Governor Chris Christie of New Jersey attempts to balance the budget. Is the $12 million spent on inspections worth the effort if only six percent of the cars fail? This seems to be at the vortex of the decision making process on this issue. Emissions inspections would have to continue or the Garden State would risk losing federal highway dollars.

The elimination of safety and mechanical inspections is nothing new, 29 other states no longer require them. The Governor’s administration has questioned the effectiveness of state vehicle safety inspections but one recent study (March 2009) conducted in Pennsylvania found that its inspection program reduced fatal crashes and saved lives in that state. The findings went further to say that, “Nationally, vehicle safety inspection programs appear to be a significant factor in lowering fatal crashes.”

The safety portion of the inspection process includes everything from brakes to wiper blades. Is the failure rate a true measure of the program’s effectiveness? My experience tells me that it isn’t because car owners anticipate their need to pass the inspection thus skewing the rejection rate lower. Would the absence of safety inspections change the quality of the vehicles on the road? My answer is that vehicle integrity would undoubtedly suffer as more registrants would push the envelope in an effort to keep their cars on the road.

A driver came in with a flat tire in need of replacement and upon returning to pick the car up asked my opinion of the other tires, one of which was down to the wear bars. I told him that I thought it would not pass inspection, but he insisted on trying to get the car tagged without replacing the tire. Although this does contradict the idea of car owners anticipating the process it does support the notion some motorists will insist on driving cars with marginal equipment.

Mechanical and safety inspections accomplish another goal and that is to set a verifiable standard of what should be on the road and what should not be. I find that it is one thing to suggest that a part needs to be replaced because it has exhausted its useful life and quite another to emphasize that the driver’s safety and the safety of those sharing the road with him is at risk by not addressing the needed repair.

How about your attitude concerning safety inspections, just more aggravation, or an essential way to insure that the car behind you isn’t going to end up sharing your back seat when its brakes fail?

Follow Us

People Who Read This Article Also Read


Have an opinion?

  • Posting indicates you have read this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
  • Notify me when there are more comments
Comment (1)
  1. How can you even think about doing away with the safety inspections? some of the cars and trucks come trough look like they were pulled from the junk yard.
    some fail 2 or 3 times before they are able to be passed. let's think of our children and what would happen to them without these inspections! people are still driving cars and trucks from the 70's and 80's and are in extremely poor condition!! KEEP THE SAFETY INSPECTION!!!!
    Post Reply
    Bad stuff?


Have an opinion? Join the conversation!

Take Us With You!

More From High Gear Media

© 2014 The Car Connection. All Rights Reserved. The Car Connection is published by High Gear Media. Stock photography by Homestar, LLC. Send us feedback.