But for a number of reasons, used rental cars aren't the great deals they used to be.
In the past, when few if any certified pre-owned (CPO) programs existed, it was your chance to get a late-model used car that had been properly maintained and, generally, taken good care of. Automakers were building as many vehicles as rental fleets could handle, and then some, and dumping them at a massive discount to renters. But recently, with automakers realizing that strategy isn't good business, and rental companies cutting costs, they're keeping vehicles in the fleet much longer and renting them out more frequently. Today it's not at all uncommon to see a rental car with 30,000 or even 40,000 miles, whereas a decade ago the vast majority of rentals had less than 15,000 miles.
"At this point, unless it's a really good deal, I wouldn't recommend it," says Charlie Vogelheim, executive editor of IntelliChoice. Vogelheim says that, anecdotally, when customers are in a vehicle that's not in as good condition, they're not going to treat it as well. And with many of today's rentals looking quite weary, it's a slippery slope.
Beware of title flags
Also of concern is the branded title flag that rental cars get in some states, which can knock thousands of dollars off the value if you plan to resell the vehicle within a year or two or make the vehicle tougher to sell over the long term. If you're going to keep a vehicle for a long time, rental cars are still a really good deal, according to Vogelheim, but you lose a lot of value right away.

Use the form below to send us a tip, give us feedback, or just say hello.
Have an opinion?Join the conversation!
By autoking Posted: 5/21/2010 3:27pm PDT
By autoviz Posted: 5/21/2010 3:32pm PDT
By Allan Posted: 5/21/2010 3:46pm PDT
By BruceMCar Posted: 5/21/2010 4:23pm PDT
By George Falcon Posted: 5/23/2010 2:01am PDT
By Tonsure Posted: 5/23/2010 6:00am PDT
By Marianne Posted: 5/24/2010 6:55am PDT
By Al Posted: 5/29/2010 8:11pm PDT
While car looked perfect, it had severe drivetrain vibrations over 60mph and neither Lexus nor the dealer were interested. I had second and third inspections and each suggested that the vehicle had been severely rear-ended and the prop-shaft and diff were not aligned properly. It was obvious that the vehicle had not been inspected as described by the Lexus CPO program. I was considering suing the dealer and Lexus for misrepresenting the condition of the vehicle, but I traded it for a new vehicle.
The CPO warranties are worth nothing. I'd rather by a cheaper new car than a CPO used car, and will never buy a used car again unless I personally know its history.
By Kevin Posted: 1/9/2011 12:00pm PST
I know. I'm a cheap skate! ;-D
Have an opinion?Join the conversation!