By
Tim Healey
Tim Healey
Contributing Writer
BIO
Tim Healey was formerly an associate editor at Consumer Guide Automotive in Chicago. Before that he worked in the automotive industry as a service...
More
LATEST ARTICLE
Saudi Woman Faces Charges For Driving During Emergency
Residents of the United States likely take their driving privileges for granted. Not so in Saudi...
Read More
- N/ALEADERBOARD RANK
- 639ARTICLES CONTRIBUTED
- 0COMMENTS POSTED
We've already brought you the tale of Madeline Leonard, the mentally-disabled woman who was overcharged by a Canadian Mazda dealership for a 2010 Mazda 6, when in fact she hadn't even intended on buying a new car.
Well, now Mazda of Canada is severing ties with the dealership, Mazda of Orangeville, due to several incidents in which the dealer violated Mazda's business practices.
Effective immediately, Mazda of Canada has terminated the sales and service agreement for Mazda of Orangeville, meaning the company can no longer sell or service cars. The dealer can't even sell parts.
This comes shortly after Mazda of Orangeville was accused of overcharging a mentally-disabled woman by $25,000 when it sold her a 2010 Mazda 6 that had been used as a demonstrator. She had entered the dealership looking to replace the tires on her 2004 Mazda 3, not to buy a new car. Instead, she spent $66,000 (all dollar figures in this post are Canadian) when the car was worth $41,000.
The company said that several violations were found under investigation, and the overcharging incident wasn't the only violation.
Dealership terminations are rare, and Mazda of Canada will buy back all new vehicles on the lot, as well as any parts. Mazda of Orangeville will still be able to sell and service used cars. The dealership could attempt to file a temporary injuction to keep its franchise agreement.
Mazda of Orangeville has promised to reimburse Leonard, but she says she has yet to receive any compensation from the dealer.
[Source: The Star via Jalopnik]
Have an opinion?
blah Posted: 5/18/2010 11:21am PDT
Serdar Posted: 5/18/2010 4:38pm PDT
Anonymous Posted: 5/18/2010 4:43pm PDT
Michael Posted: 5/18/2010 5:22pm PDT
rbryant Posted: 5/18/2010 9:35pm PDT
Chris Posted: 5/18/2010 10:04pm PDT
Confused Posted: 5/19/2010 12:48am PDT
Dom Posted: 5/19/2010 1:22am PDT
Dom Posted: 5/19/2010 1:30am PDT
"We are committed to offering honest, unbiased reviews"
What a joke. Maybe it didn't come off as bias but there is ALLOT information missing.
* Her "disability" is anxiety and depression
* She was only changed an extra 11%~ on the car, the other $26k~ extra was because she had poor credit history,
Mike Posted: 5/19/2010 6:08am PDT
HeyDumDom Posted: 5/21/2010 2:38pm PDT
Anyway, regardless of whether or not she was competent enough to enter into the agreement, if Mazda decided there was more damage done to the brand that the dealership was bringing in, then good for them. I don't know that any law was actually broken here, as much as we all like to hate car dealers.
It is sleazy or not? that depends on whether the dealership played on her disability or anxiety or not. As far as I know, all car buyers look anxious cause they are making a large purchase, but its hard to tell just reading the original article or this short summary.
Dan Posted: 6/27/2010 7:45am PDT
Mazda USA does nothing in response. This is a toxic dealership.
Tem Posted: 4/10/2011 2:17am PDT
Chucks Posted: 4/13/2011 7:02am PDT
Have an opinion?Join the conversation!