Advertisement
Find a Car
Go!

Driven: 2010 Honda Accord Crosstour

Follow Bengt

2010 Honda Accord Crosstour

The 2010 Honda Crosstour is an unusual beast—so unusual that the first time you see one you'll likely stand back, size it up, and scratch your head a bit, as we saw people do time and time again when we drove one for a week recently.

Then you're probably going to say something along the lines of, "I love it!" or "I don't see the point." Yes, it's that polarizing.

There's also the issue that, yes, the Crosstour's proportions tend to look slightly…goofy, for lack of a better word, at first glance. But with a few walkarounds and the time to let the design settle, it works surprisingly well, and grew on this reviewer even if the purpose didn't. Despite what some other reviewers have said, we think the blunt grille and rather aggressive front-end styling go together quite well with the also very upright tail. And the Crosstour's unusual roofline? You'll warm up to it.

If a few things don't bother you, that is. In back, the roofline not only curves downward but also inward, making it surprisingly confining for headroom (although it's actually okay for six-footers). In the cargo area the low roofline takes its toll on usability; there's not really enough height for a medium-size dog kennel, and at about two and a half feet wide at its narrowest point, between the intrusive strut towers, you'll be hard-pressed to fit a smallish dresser back there. And the rearward visibility is difficult, if you don't use some help from the rear camera system that comes with the optional nav system.

Get behind the wheel, and you'll find that the 2010 Crosstour drives somewhat like the Accord sedan but with a heavier, more deliberate feel that's a step in the opposite direction of the nimble feel we've praised the Accord sedan for in the past. The 271-horsepower, 3.5-liter V-6 moves the Crosstour plenty quick, but you're going to feel that weight in stop-and-go traffic. It steers well and has reasonably good body control on a curvy road, but there's quite a bit more fore-aft motion during hard braking or strong acceleration than we remember from the Accord. The transmission hesitates to downshift when coming out of a corner, yet it holds lower gears for longer than needed during light acceleration. There's no manumatic function in the Crosstour—either in terms of steering-wheel paddles or a separate shift gate—so it's apparent Honda isn't counting on buyers being hotfoots or picking the Crosstour as a substitute for, say, an Acura RDX.

You're also not likely to see mileage figures much better than the Pilot SUV. Over a week and about 120 miles of suburban errand-running, we barely managed 19 mpg in the Crosstour (the EPA rating is 18 mpg city, 27 highway with FWD, 17/25 with AWD). The Toyota Venza is offered with a base 182-horsepower, 2.7-liter four-cylinder engine in addition to a 268-hp V-6, but the Accord Crosstour is only offered in V-6 form.

While it weighs about the same as its primary rival, the Toyota Venza, the 2010 Honda Crosstour is about 300 pounds heavier than a V-6 Accord sedan and an eyebrow-raising 650 pounds heavier than a four-cylinder Accord sedan. The Accord Crosstour is 7.6 inches higher than the Accord sedan and rides a couple of inches higher, though its six inches of official ground clearance are about the same as the sedan's.


 
Follow Us

 

Have an opinion?

  • Posting indicates you have read this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
  • Notify me when there are more comments
Comments (10)
  1. No sorry, not feeling it. To take an Accord and make it that heavy, with much worse gas mileage and much less visibility... all for slightly more room for stuff in the back (as long as it's not tall or wide) just doesn't add up. Add to that Honda's really questionable recent styling direction and you have the makings of a problem, not a success. The front and rear genuinely look as if they were designed by two separate committees. For some reason the look reminds me of a '79 AMC Eagle hatchback... though it could be argued that the Eagle design was better executed.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  2. This proves you can make a good car better!
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  3. I could see this whole package going over a lot better if they'd made it more Outback-like...
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  4. Agree with Edward. They seem to have gone so far to make this Not A Station Wagon that they lost a lot of the utility of a tall upright car-thing. Heavier, worse mileage, no four, and a narrow rear load compartment? Sorry, Honda: #FAIL.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  5. This thing is gonna make history: joining the Pontiac Aztek as another design by committee that ended up looking absolutely awful. If you like it, wait awhile until they languish on the lot for a better deal.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  6. what is the appeal of this site, not great MPG and UGLY!!! no thanks
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  7. I just leased one after returning a Nissan Pathfinder, I love this vehicle. It took going back to the dealership twice just to make sure it was all that I liked and wanted. It's true that it's a little unusual and the critism about it staying in low gears too long is valid as is the narrow trunk space towards the rear which is going to piss me off at some point. Other than that I love everything about this vehicle including the styling, I don't see very many on the road but I expect that to change as soon as people get used to the lines etc. I have 3 small kids, they love it too. It's not a sports utility vehicle in my mind so forget this car if that's what you're looking for.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  8. Just another way to charge more for an Accord and a bad job of it, too. Drove one and too many issues to list here.
    Honda has lost it way and not the same Car Co. of Yesteryear.
    Will skip this one and others till they get back to making more reliable and better design and some appointments to their vehicles.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  9. I leased a Honda Crosstour in November after having four Pilots. I wanted to switch to a car, but I wanted a little more height than the Accord has to offer. Having driven several Accords prior to those aforementioned Pilots, I knew I wanted to ride a little higher than that. The Crosstour is exactly what I was looking for! I am a stay-at-home mom with one daughter who always has friends with her. We live in the city, and I find this perfect for maneuverability in traffic and much easier to maneuver around crowded city parking lots/garages. Sure, it's not an SUV, but I can get everything in it. And it's not a mini-van or station wagon, thank God! No complaints here...just love for the Crosstour!
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

     
  10. Would like to add that mine is the 2012 model V-6 WITH 4WD.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

 

Have an opinion? Join the conversation!

Advertisement
Advertisement
Take Us With You!
   
Advertisement

More From High Gear Media


 
 
© 2014 The Car Connection. All Rights Reserved. The Car Connection is published by High Gear Media. Stock photography by Homestar, LLC. Send us feedback.