Find a Car

V-Vehicle Misses Key Deadline, Forfeits $87 Million From Louisiana

Follow Richard

Teaser for Louisiana's new VVC plant

Teaser for Louisiana's new VVC plant

Enlarge Photo

2011 VVC sketches

2011 VVC sketches

Enlarge Photo

Bad news for startup automaker V-Vehicle: the company has missed a crucial funding deadline, and as a result, it will forfeit $87 million in cash and incentives from the state of Louisiana for V-Vehicle's new plant in Monroe. As per an agreement with the state, V-Vehicle needed to demonstrate that it had amassed a minimum of $350 million in capital by March 1, 2010 in order to win the $87 million package, but to date, it has raised significantly less.

When we checked in on V-Vehicle back in January, the company had secured around $90 million in private financing to build gas-powered cars boasting fuel efficiencies that "dramatically exceed any electric vehicles or any hybrid vehicles". The Department of Energy had also begun reviewing V-Vehicle's application for $320 million in low-interest loans from the DOE's Advanced Technology Vehicles Manufacturing program. (That's the same $25 billion program that has already awarded loans to Ford, Nissan, Tesla, and Fisker.) At the time, V-Vehicle spokesman Joe Fisher said, "[W]e feel confident that we will get a positive decision on our application [from the DOE] before March 1."

Not to get all schadenfreude-y on a Monday morning, but it would appear that Fisher's confidence was misplaced, since it's now March 1, and no decision on V-Vehicle's loan application has been announced by the DOE. To be fair, that announcement could still come today -- the DOE doesn't comment on applications until the agency has decided on them -- but we aren't holding our breath. Making things worse, V-Vehicle's other fundraising efforts seem to have plateaued, since the company still has less than $100 million in the kitty. Add that up, carry the one, and it's clear that V-Vehicle doesn't have the necessary $350 million in capital to win support from the state.

So what does this mean? Well, for starters, the company will have to reimburse Louisiana for the money it has already spent on the V-Vehicle project -- a total of $6.2 million that has been put toward improvements at V-Vehicle's factory site in Ouachita Parish. That cash was part of the state's $87 million support package, which Louisiana agreed to release early as a gesture of good faith. Reimbursing that dough will knock V-Vehicle's capital below the $90 million mark.

But all isnt' lost: if V-Vehicle proves successful in its quest for DOE funds, the state can enter into another agreement with the company to send big bucks  its way. In fact, Louisiana Department of Economic Development Secretary, Stephen Moret, has said that he will ask the Louisiana legislature to do just that if the DOE gives V-Vehicle a thumbs-up. And frankly, if Louisiana still has $87 million lying around after the governor, the senate, and the house finish wrangling over next year's budget and plugging the state's billion-dollar shortfall, V-Vehicle has a reasonable chance of getting it.


Follow Us


Have an opinion?

  • Posting indicates you have read this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
  • Notify me when there are more comments
Comment (1)
  1. Less than 20 car companies (The ATVM people say there were tons of applications but only a handful were car companies) applied for $25 BILLION DOLLARS in taxpayer money managed by a certain smug group of people at DOE in order to get loans to make green cars for Americans. This was not all of DOE that did bad things, just a private cadre of men led by Lachland Seward and Matt Rogers and his McKinsey “Partner” who flew back and forth to their homes in Silicon Valley every weekend on the taxpayer dime.
    There was enough money to help every single one of the car companies that applied. The administrators applied their interpretations of the law in order to benefit the large lobby group-related firms and avoided every one of the “politically unconnected “independent American companies.
    The amount of lobby and influence money spent by each awardee is in direct ratio to the amount of money awarded. Pay-to-play was the process.
    The smaller companies, due to lower overhead, could have dramatically more productive results with the money than the large burdened companies yet the money was given out based on political career advantages for the administrators rather than the technology advantages for Americans.
    The way the ATVM people set it up (Google “Siry says stifles innovation” for more), the smaller applicants were prevented from getting outside investor funding.
    Post Reply
    Bad stuff?


Have an opinion? Join the conversation!

Try My Showroom
Save cars, write notes, and comparison shop with hi-res photos.
Add your first car
Take Us With You!

© 2014 The Car Connection. All Rights Reserved. The Car Connection is published by High Gear Media. Stock photography by izmo, Inc. Send us feedback.