Advertisement
Find a Car
Go!

Today In Ads: AutoWeek's Gory, Confusing Stand On Distracted Driving

Follow Richard

AutoWeek's 'Russian Roulette' distracted-driving ad

AutoWeek's 'Russian Roulette' distracted-driving ad

Enlarge Photo

Here at TCC and throughout the auto media, distracted driving has been a hot topic. From eating to in-car internet, we've discussed the dangers, the myths, and the results of taking your attention off the road when you're behind the wheel. Our colleagues at AutoWeek recently decided to ditch the chatter and make their point graphically -- very graphically -- with a new print ad that compares texting and driving to a game of Russian roulette. But while the analogy may be accurate, the ad itself is a bloody mess.

To its credit, the spot does grab your attention. The revolver, the cell phone, and the giant blood stain are more than enough to make readers stop in their tracks. Unfortunately, they may not linger very long.

The biggest problem is that the graphic does a terrible job of explaining itself. What's going on here? Did a cell phone explode? Is the handgun defending the phone from armed attackers? Or did the handgun give the cell some payback-as-you-go? When we read the copy below the image, we see that the image is meant to draw a comparison between handguns and cell phones, but without that extra information, it looks kind of like they're buddies making a stand at the Alamo.

For another thing, the ad is too gory and earnest. Sure, our gut reaction to idiots who do stuff like text and drive may be to shake them by the shoulders, to shock them into changing their ways, but in advertising, that approach almost never works. Remember the "This is your brain on drugs" commercial which took a similarly violent tack? How many parodies of that have you seen? (Be honest) Showing readers the impact of something on their own lives is always more effective. For examples, look to anti-smoking campaigns, like the ads featuring Rick Stoddard, who lost his wife at age 46, or the ones that appeal to smokers' vanity? You want young people to stop smoking? Show 'em some photos of Keith Richards and say, "Dude, THIS IS YOU."

And for a third thing, the ad leaves out a very important bit of information. While the piece seems to focus on texting and driving, studies have shown that the simple act of talking on the phone -- whether it's in your hand or not -- is a huge distraction. Unfortunately, like the image above it, the copy is clunky and tries to convey too much at once.

For those of you saying, "Okay, critics, show us how you'd do an ad", we plainly admit: we got nothing. But then, we're not a print publication, either. And we have covered the topic in countless articles here on TCC and elsewhere in the HGM family. We suggest starting with Bengt Halvorson's recent article on the failure of anti-cell phone laws to reduce auto accidents. And buckle up out there.

[AnimalNewYork]

Advertisement
 
Follow Us

 

Have an opinion?

  • Posting indicates you have read this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
  • Notify me when there are more comments
Comments (3)
  1. I like Autoweek's less then superlative ad better then no ad from TCC or others.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  2. High school driver education began back in the 1950s when this became an object of study. Did “gory” PSAs on TV, radio or print work better at restraining dangerous behavior? In every case, the answer is NO – kids are certain the such things happen to other less skilled people.
    It is well established that “shut up and drive” should apply to all distracting activity for the driver. We know that airbags were mandated because they are democratic: The help protect even the people who are too dumb, or “Smart” to buckle the seatbelts. Experience shows these are kids, older people and drunks (KOD).
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  3. We are just keeping up with the KODs. When I began crash scene investigations and crash testing the conventional wisdom was that a 10 mph frontal impact with an unyielding object (the crash barrier) would be fatal for the driver. Today, all car must demonstrate live preserving capability in a test at 35 mph. So, despite the enormous growth in numbers of cars and drivers since then the accident fatality rate remains around 40,000/year..
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

 

Have an opinion? Join the conversation!

Advertisement
Advertisement
Try My Showroom
Save cars, write notes, and comparison shop with hi-res photos.
Add your first car
Take Us With You!
   
Advertisement

 
© 2014 The Car Connection. All Rights Reserved. The Car Connection is published by High Gear Media. Stock photography by izmo, Inc. Send us feedback.