Find a Car

Go!

2011 Ford Shelby GT500 Preview


2011 Ford Shelby GT500

We've known for weeks most of the major outlines of Ford's 2011 upgrades for the Shelby GT500 thanks to a few early leaked documents, but now the official info and photos are out, confirming most of what we knew, and filling in the details. The car gains 10 horsepower as its 9-poundaboost supercharged engine gets an all-aluminum block for a total of 550 horsepower and 510 pound-feet of torque.

Lighter Ford GT-derived engine
Going with the aluminum block helps the Shelby dump a full 102 pounds off the nose, delivering a lighter, more balanced car--though it still weighs in at 3,820 pounds in coupe form and 3,969 pounds as a convertible. That's a hefty coupe, but only about 120 pounds heavier than the M3 Coupe, and the convertible is actually 200 pounds lighter than the E90 M3 Convertible. The Shelby's still a bit nose-heavy, at 56/44 front/rear weight distribution for the Coupe and 55/45 for the Convertible.

Carroll Shelby himself is proud of the weight savings, pointing out that “Cutting weight to improve performance is a tradition among hot rodders,” said Carroll Shelby, founder of Shelby American. “It might not be as sexy as adding more horsepower or bigger brakes, but shaving pounds off of a car is the single smartest move you can make.” Ford says the engine is an evolution on the engine from the Ford GT supercar, with improved structure and new materials processes, including a new nanoparticle coating for the cylinder walls that eliminates the need for the steel sleeves used in many aluminum blocks. The pistons are forged aluminum, though the connecting rods are still forged steel I-beams for strength.

Better economy despite more power
The 2011 Shelby GT500 won't ever be taken for a parsimonious people-mover, but it does improve on its own previous figures by 1 mpg, rating 15 mpg in town and 23 mpg on the highway. In our testing of the 2010 Shelby GT500 Convertible last year, we saw 20-22 mpg on the highway with the top down and an injudicious right foot. The best part of the 1-mpg bump? No more gas guzzler tax.

The fuel economy savings are due to the lighter weight, under-body aerodynamics changes and the addition of electric power-assisted steering, or EPAS. The EPAS system is likely to be looked at askance by enthusiasts concerned with handling and road feel and it'll remain to be seen if it ends up being a legitimate point of criticism, but electric power-steering systems have come a long way lately, so there's hope that it may be communicative. Special attention was paid by the SVT team to help make the system quicker and more precise than the outgoing hydraulic system, though we'll wait until we get our hands on it to render final judgment.

New SVT Performance Package
The new-for-2011 SVT Performance Package offers a more capable track-day car thanks to brand new Goodyear Eagle F1 Supercar G:2 tires co-developed between SVT and Goodyear, plus lighter wheels, a higher rear axle ratio, better shocks and stiffer springs. The SVT Performance Package is available on both coupe and convertible models. It also comes with unique, thinner Shelby top and side stripes, a rear spoiler with Gurney flap and a unique shift knob.

The 2011 Shelby GT500 also rides 11 mm lower in front and 8 mm lower in the rear for improved handling. Slotted brake dust shields help with brake cooling, and a revised pedal box makes dancing the pedals easier. The new GT500 convertible is also 12 percent stiffer than the 2010 model, thanks to the addition of gussets on the V-brace and the addition of a front Z-brace and A-pillar stiffening foam. Ford says the new SVT-pack 2011 GT500 is three seconds faster around a 2.3-mile test track than the 2010 GT500--no small improvement.






 
Follow Us

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

  • Posting indicates you have read this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
Comments (6)
  1. I really like this car, and even better now that it is shedding weight, though I hope that the next version will use a force induction version of the Coyote or even the Bobcat 5 liter V8.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  2. I can't imagine what those modifications may be given that an IRS is pretty much out of the question. Are they moving the battery to the trunk? Putting in a lighter radiator? Maybe it's just a disclosure - like announcing that the modifications have resulted in a near 50/50 weight distribution?
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  3. 102 lbs off the nose is huge! But $50k+ for a Mustang? That's pushing the envelope.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  4. 50k is a lot, but for a car that boasts 550hp, and it's got SHELBY on the butt, it's not nearly pushing the envelope when you consider the competition.
    the Corvette Z06 which costs 74k, and is down 50hp
    the ZR1 has it beat by 80hp but costs over 100k
    the base line Vette which the Shelby eats alive (with about 20 more hp than a standard 2011 GT) and it is 45k. 5k less than the Shelby and guessing 10k more than the GT.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  5. I've got one on order and should be in the garage in October. It's my first mustang, so I'll let you know how it is.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  6. Strange that a 3800 lb car with "550" blown horsepower only runs the quarter mile in 12.5? Am I missing something here? The 2011 Challenger 392, with 470 "real" horsepower, (with no blowers or bolt ons) and weighing 4100 lbs runs the quarter consistently from 12.44-12.8....The Mustangs are ubiquitous...and common.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

Your Friends Like


 
© 2012 The Car Connection. All Rights Reserved. The Car Connection is published by High Gear Media. Stock photography by Homestar, LLC. Send us feedback.
 

Use the form below to send us a tip, give us feedback, or just say hello.

(max 750 characters)