Find a Car

Go!

Why New Ford V-6 and V-8 Engines Don't Have Direct Injection


2011 Mustang GT 5.0 engine

2011 Mustang GT 5.0 engine

Enlarge Photo

New 5.0-liter V-8 - 2011 Ford Mustang GT

New 5.0-liter V-8 - 2011 Ford Mustang GT

Enlarge Photo

New 5.0-liter V-8 - 2011 Ford Mustang GT

New 5.0-liter V-8 - 2011 Ford Mustang GT

Enlarge Photo

2011 Ford Mustang GT

2011 Ford Mustang GT

Enlarge Photo

2010 Detroit Auto Show

2010 Detroit Auto Show

Enlarge Photo

2010 Detroit Auto Show

2010 Detroit Auto Show

Enlarge Photo

A couple of years ago, General Motors introduced a new-generation 3.6-liter direct-injection V-6—beating its Detroit rivals, and most other automakers, to market with a DI engine. Between the Los Angeles and Detroit auto shows, Ford has introduced a pair of all-new V-6 and V-8 engines, slated for a wide range of applications and the V-6 making more power and torque than that GM V-6. But neither of the Ford engines employ DI.

So, we asked a powertrain expert at Ford, why is this? The answer, surprisingly, is that while we've been led for years to assume that direct injection is always a step ahead for fuel economy and emissions, in many cases it's not—especially when considering cost and complexity, and how the technology will pair with other innovations.

"When the program started, it [the new Duratec in the Mustang] was a direct-injection engine," said Greg T. Johnson, a powertrain integration manager whose responsibilities include both engines. But according to Johnson, Ford powertrain engineers eventually realized that leaving the DI aspect out of the design allowed charge-cooling advantages—allowing engineers to better optimize intake air temps for fuel economy, power, and emissions.

Typically, direct injection allows better control over knock, enabling a higher compression ratio, which does help optimize combustion. "Yeah, it helped us a little bit with knock, but it wasn't that much for all the cost," said Johnson, referring to all the more expensive parts, such as high-pressure fuel-system components, needed for DI. Ford even brought a DI version of the engine through to the point of running prototypes, "but in the end it didn't make business sense," Johnson summed.

The strategy—instead optimizing the new Ti-VCT system and emphasizing breathing—paid off. Having the extra leeway with breathing allowed both engines to put out more power and torque than rival direct-injection engines, while the variable valvetrain boosts efficiency with low load. The new Ford Duratec 37 produces 305 horsepower and 280 pound-feet, while GM's 3.6-liter direct-injected V-6 makes 280 to 304 hp, and 266 to 273 lb-ft, depending on the application.

The new 5.0-liter V-8 in the 2011 Mustang GT likewise has Ti-VCT and some of the same design attributes, according to Johnson (though with a number of racing oriented enhancements we report on here). It also makes more than many same-size or slightly larger V-8s, at 412 horsepower and 390 pound-feet of torque.

Fuel economy, too, is a strong point, with the V-6 expected to yield up to 30 mpg on the highway in the 2011 Ford Mustang and up to 25 mpg on the highway in the 2011 Lincoln MKX (and anticipated for the 2011 Ford Edge). GM's direct-injected V-6 achieves 18/29, at best, in the 2010 Chevrolet Camaro and up to 17/24 mpg in the (admittedly larger) Buick Enclave.

The new 5.0-liter V-8 is also expected to be quite fuel-efficient, with ratings up to 25 mpg highway in the 2011 Ford Mustang GT.

The 2.0-liter, naturally aspirated four-cylinder engine being introduced for the Ford Focus does have DI. According to Johnson, there are no plans to add direct injection to normally aspirated V-6 or V-8 engines, but we will continue to see direct injection in all EcoBoost engines because they are very knock limited and the extra measure of DI helps.

Undoubtedly, it depends who you ask. But maybe DI isn't the very worthwhile upgrade it's often touted to be.





Posted in:
 
Follow Us

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

  • Posting indicates you have read this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
Comments (6)
  1. I do not know and would like to hear about DI vs non-DI wrt emissions. I suspect that DI is relatively cleaner, but since Ford didn't take bailout money isn't as compelled to use it as GM.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  2. I hope that Ford will pull through and I will be able to get a Mustang one day. They use to update it with some flair every decade or so but now every year brings something exciting and actually useful.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  3. So the Duratec V6 produces 1 more hp and 7 lb-ft more than GM's DI V6. It would interesting to know at what rpm these engines make those power numbers? What does the torque & horsepower curve look like for both engines?
    Making the power isn't a problem it's doing it over a wide and useable rpm range is the key. Years ago I made the mistake of buying a Dodge Ram and even though it had a similar power rating as the GM trucks I have owned it had a very narrow power band. The Ram didn't have much power until 3400 rpm and fell on it's face at 4200 rpm. It really sucked towing on the highway.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  4. As rocket points out, it is the speed vs torque curve that is important. The camaro is almost 400 lbs heavier than the mustang. add 400 lbs to a mustang and then run the fuel economy numbers. Otherwise it is an apples to orange comparison. Also as rocket88 points out, it is the torque and power curve that matters, and in no way a PFI like this new ford engine beats a DI on that.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  5. This is just a snow job by Ford to make you think their way is best. The bottom line is which vehicle, comparing and apple to an apple, performs best. I believe the Direct Injection will win.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  6. Orbitals low pressure air assist direct injection is by far the best at atomizing fuel at around 5-8 microns,check out there FLEX DI it can burn any fuel,the Chinese may be the fist to use it in autos, it is already in outboards[Mercurys Optimax & Tohatso] and scooters
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

Your Friends Like


 
© 2012 The Car Connection. All Rights Reserved. The Car Connection is published by High Gear Media. Stock photography by Homestar, LLC. Send us feedback.
 

Use the form below to send us a tip, give us feedback, or just say hello.

(max 750 characters)