Advertisement
Find a Car
Go!

Side Pole Crash-Test Part Of Tougher NHTSA Ratings For 2011

Follow Bengt

Murcielago crashed in the UK

Murcielago crashed in the UK

Enlarge Photo

To put it bluntly, crash-test results in their present state can be frustrating for shoppers. Take a look either at crash-test ratings from the federal government or from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) and you’re bound to be confused by the sheer number of vehicles that have all garnered top ratings.

For some types of vehicles, like compact or mid-size crossover vehicles, it’s become virtually impossible to separate the safest vehicles from the merely safe ones. For several years now, the federal government hasn’t given any crash-test scores below three stars and the IIHS has awarded more ‘good’ scores in its frontal and side impact tests than anything else. For instance, the 2010 Subaru Forester and 2010 Audi Q7 are just a couple of the most recent review updates we’ve posted in which we’ve noted five stars in all frontal and side tests; both vehicles have also achieved top results from the IIHS.

For 2011, that abundance of top scores is bound to change, at least for the federal government’s New Car Assessment Program (NCAP). It will be rehabbed with new injury force limits and new test dummies—with the result likely being fewer four- and five-star scores across the board, and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration calling it the most significant changes since the program began in 1979. Also to be phased in beginning for 2011 is the long-anticipated pole side-impact test

The new pole test—representing a side collision with a thin, solid barrier like a tree or utility pole—simulates one of the deadliest types of accidents. Specifically, the vehicle hits a ten-inch vertical pole at a 75-degree angle, at up to 20 mph, its impact centered at the front of the driver’s door and behind the windshield pillar.

Automakers won’t have to meet the pole-test standards with all their vehicles right away. Under a phased compliance period, 100 percent of 2014 models required to meet them but only 20 percent of 2011 models.

The New York Times reports that the pole test is more complicated because it’s not simply a matter of preventing structural deformation from a wide side barrier; new two-section airbags might be necessary, with a softer upper section to protect the head and chest combined with a firmer lower section to protect the pelvis and hold the occupant in position.

The tradeoff? The new standards might prove to be expensive to meet—especially for those companies planning world cars that now must meet increasingly different crash-test requirements depending on the market.

[New York Times]

Posted in:
Advertisement
 
Follow Us

 

Have an opinion?

  • Posting indicates you have read this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
  • Notify me when there are more comments
Comments (9)
  1. Great, the government has come up with yet another way to force automakers to increase the weight of their vehicles, while simultaneously complaining about their fuel efficiency. Why stop here? Let's cut to the chase and require everyone to drive an M1 Abrams tank covered with strobe lights and gets 45 mpg. You can't make a car like that? Well, you're not being a team player.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  2. Come on, did they have to crash a Murcielago for the test?
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  3. glad to see us finally getting this. You may not hit a pole every day, but a lot of other things (corners, motorcycles, etc) are shaped similarly.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  4. A crash pole test? C'mon-just buy a GM with Onstar and if you hit a pole or someone else broadsides your car, Onstar can sense the extent of your injuries. On the other hand, if you run into poles frequently, I would suggest an eye exam or another mode of transporation.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  5. These kinds of accidents are far more common than you think. Glad they are doing trying to make the vehicle's safer in this respect.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  6. I think that the fact that more cars get top safety marks is a good thing - it shows how much focus there is on safety in recent years.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  7. The IIHS also has tougher ratings this year...only a third of the same cars are top safety picks this year
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  8. hi . how much many crashed murcielago . if you know tell me pleas .
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  9. Just require that all cars be kept waxed and it will just bounce off whatever it hits.. lol
    Or just butter them up
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

 

Have an opinion? Join the conversation!

Advertisement
Advertisement
Try My Showroom
Save cars, write notes, and comparison shop with hi-res photos.
Add your first car
Take Us With You!
   
Advertisement

 
© 2015 The Car Connection. All Rights Reserved. The Car Connection is published by High Gear Media. Stock photography by izmo, Inc. Send us feedback.
Advertisement